Skip to main content

Intention Estimation and Recommendation System Based on Attention Sharing

  • Conference paper
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8226))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In human-agent interactions, attention sharing plays a key role in understanding other’s intention without explicit verbal explanation. Deep learning algorithms are recently used to model these interactions in a complex real world environment. In this paper we propose a deep learning based intention estimation and recommendation system by understanding humans attention based on their gestures. Action-object affordances are modeled using stacked auto-encoder, which represents the relationships between actions and objects. Intention estimation and object recommendation system according to human intention is implemented based on an affordance model. Experimental result demonstrates meaningful intention estimation and recommendation performance in the real-world scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duncan, J.: Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 113, 501–517 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Treisman, A.M.: Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review 76 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ban, S.-W., Jang, Y.-M., Lee, M.: Affective saliency map considering psychological distance. Neurocomputing 74, 1916–1925 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kozima, H.: Attention-sharing and behavior-sharing in human-robot communication. In: IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moore, C.E., Dunham. P.J.: Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson, J.J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kjellström, H., Romero, J., Kragić, D.: Visual object-action recognition: Inferring object affordances from human demonstration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 115, 81–90 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Montesano, L., et al.: Learning Object Affordances: From Sensory-Motor Coordination to Imitation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 24, 15–26 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu, C., Cheng, Q., Sheng, W.: Human intention recognition in smart assisted living systems using a hierarchical hidden Markov model. In: IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, pp. 253–258 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schrempf, O.C., Hanebeck, U.D.: A generic model for estimating user-intentions in human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, vol. 5 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kelley, R., Wigand, L., Hamilton, B., Browne, K., Nicolescu, M., Nicolescu, M.: Deep networks for predicting human intent with respect to objects. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 171–172 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang, B., Jang, Y.-M., Mallipeddi, R., Lee, M.: Probabilistic human intention modeling for cognitive augmentation. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 2580–2584 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rish, I.: An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. In: IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Empirical Methods in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 41–46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shotton, J., Sharp, T., Kipman, A., Fitzgibbon, A., Finocchio, M., Blake, A., Cook, M., Moore, R.: Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images. Communications of the ACM 56, 116–124 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Lajoie, I., Bengio, Y., Manzagol, P.A.: Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 9999, 3371–3408 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hinton, G.E., Osindero, S., Teh, Y.-W.: A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation 18, 1527–1554 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hinton, G.E., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786), 504–507 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, S., Jung, J., Kavuri, S., Lee, M. (2013). Intention Estimation and Recommendation System Based on Attention Sharing. In: Lee, M., Hirose, A., Hou, ZG., Kil, R.M. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8226. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-42054-2_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-42054-2_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-42053-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-42054-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics