Skip to main content

Designing Profit Shares in Matching and Coalition Formation Games

  • Conference paper
Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8289))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Matching and coalition formation are fundamental problems in a variety of scenarios where agents join efforts to perform tasks, such as, e.g., in scientific publishing. To allocate credit or profit stemming from a joint project, different communities use different crediting schemes in practice. A natural and widely used approach to profit distribution is equal sharing, where every member receives the same credit for a joint work. This scheme captures a natural egalitarian fairness condition when each member of a coalition is critical for success. Unfortunately, when coalitions are formed by rational agents, equal sharing can lead to high inefficiency of the resulting stable states.

In this paper, we study the impact of changing profit sharing schemes in order to obtain good stable states in matching and coalition formation games. We generalize equal sharing to sharing schemes where for each coalition each player is guaranteed to receive at least an α-share. This way the coalition formation can stabilize on more efficient outcomes. In particular, we show a direct trade-off between efficiency and equal treatment. If k denotes the size of the largest possible coalition, we prove an asymptotically tight bound of k 2 α on prices of anarchy and stability. This result extends to polynomial-time algorithms to compute good sharing schemes. Further, we show improved results for a novel class of matching problems that covers many well-studied cases, including two-sided matching and instances with integrality gap 1.

Supported by DFG Cluster of Excellence MMCI and grant Ho 3831/3-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackermann, H., Goldberg, P., Mirrokni, V., Röglin, H., Vöcking, B.: Uncoordinated two-sided matching markets. SIAM J. Comput. 40(1), 92–106 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Akkaya, K., Guneydas, I., Bicak, A.: Autonomous actor positioning in wireless sensor and actor networks using stable matching. Intl. J. Parallel, Emergent and Distrib. Syst. 25(6), 439–464 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Anshelevich, E., Bhardwaj, O., Hoefer, M.: Friendship and stable matching. In: Bodlaender, H.L., Italiano, G.F. (eds.) ESA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8125, pp. 49–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Anshelevich, E., Das, S., Naamad, Y.: Anarchy, stability, and utopia: Creating better matchings. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 26(1), 120–140 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anshelevich, E., Hoefer, M.: Contribution games in networks. Algorithmica 63(1-2), 51–90 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Augustine, J., Chen, N., Elkind, E., Fanelli, A., Gravin, N., Shiryaev, D.: Dynamics of profit-sharing games. In: Proc. 22nd Intl. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), pp. 37–42 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biró, P., Kern, W., Paulusma, D.: Computing solutions for matching games. Int. J. Game Theory 41(1), 75–90 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blum, Y., Roth, A., Rothblum, U.: Vacancy chains and equilibration in senior-level labor markets. J. Econom. Theory 76, 362–411 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Branzei, S., Larson, K.: Coalitional affinity games and the stability gap. In: Proc. 21st Intl. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), pp. 79–84 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cechlárova, K.: Stable partition problem. In: Encyclopedia of Algorithms (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, H.-L., Roughgarden, T., Valiant, G.: Designing network protocols for good equilibria. SIAM J. Comput. 39(5), 1799–1832 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, N., Lu, P., Zhang, H.: Computing the nucleolus of matching, cover and clique games. In: Proc. 26th Conf. Artificial Intelligence, AAAI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deng, X., Ibaraki, T., Nagamochi, H.: Algorithmic aspects of the core of combinatorial optimization games. Math. Oper. Res. 24(3), 751–766 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gairing, M., Savani, R.: Computing stable outcomes in hedonic games. In: Kontogiannis, S., Koutsoupias, E., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) SAGT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6386, pp. 174–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Gusfield, D., Irving, R.: The Stable Marriage Problem: Structure and Algorithms. MIT Press (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hajduková, J.: Coalition formation games: A survey. Intl. Game Theory Rev. 8(4), 613–641 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoefer, M.: Local matching dynamics in social networks. Inf. Comput. 222, 20–35 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoefer, M., Wagner, L.: Locally stable marriage with strict preferences. In: Fomin, F.V., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds.) ICALP 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7966, pp. 620–631. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kern, W., Paulusma, D.: Matching games: The least core and the nucleolus. Math. Oper. Res. 28(2), 294–308 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kleinberg, J., Oren, S.: Mechanisms for (mis)allocating scientific credit. In: Proc. 43rd Symp. Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 529–538 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Balanced outcomes in social exchange networks. In: Proc. 40th Symp. Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 295–304 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Manlove, D.: Algorithmics of Matching Under Preferences. World Scientific (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sung, S.-C., Dimitrov, D.: Computational complexity in additive hedonic games. Europ. J. Oper. Res. 203(3), 635–639 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. von Falkenhausen, P., Harks, T.: Optimal cost sharing for resource selection games. Math. Oper. Res. 38(1), 184–208 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoefer, M., Wagner, L. (2013). Designing Profit Shares in Matching and Coalition Formation Games. In: Chen, Y., Immorlica, N. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8289. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45046-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45046-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45045-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45046-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics