Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook on Business Process Management 1 pp 251–278Cite as

Lifecycle Management of Business Process Variants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

This chapter deals with advanced concepts for the configuration and management of business process variants. Typically, for a particular business process, different variants exist. Each of them constitutes an adjustment of a master process (e.g., a reference process) to specific requirements building the process context. Contemporary Business Process Management tools do not adequately support the modeling and management of such process variants. Either the variants have to be specified in separate process models or they are expressed in terms of conditional branches within the same process model. Both methods can result in high model redundancies, which make model adaptations a time-consuming and error-prone task. In this chapter, we discuss advanced concepts of our Provop approach, which provides a flexible and powerful solution for managing business process variants along their lifecycle. Such variant support will foster more systematic process configuration as well as process maintenance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    If only single elements are affected by a particular change operation, their process element IDs may be used alternatively.

  2. 2.

    Note that this example indicates that we need more advanced change support that considers the special semantics of adjustment points. Generally, the user should be able to define whether adjustment points may be deleted when applying certain change operations or shall be kept in the intermediate model. In the latter case, the deleted activities and nodes respectively are replaced by silent activities without associated actions. Generally, silent activities and adjustment points are removed after application of all selected options.

  3. 3.

    For a formal semantics of respective change patterns, we refer to (Rinderle-Ma et al. 2008).

  4. 4.

    Note that every change operation supported by Provop requires specific considerations here.

References

  • Ayora C, Torres V, Reichert M, Weber B, Pelechano V (2012) Towards run-time flexibility for process families: open issues and research challenges. In: Proceedings BPM’12 workshops, LNBIP, vol 132, Tallinn, pp 477–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayora C, Torres V, Weber B, Reichert M, Pelechano V (2013a) Change patterns for process families. Technical report PROS-TR-2013-06, University of Valencia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayora C, Torres V, Weber B, Reichert M, Pelechano V (2013b) Enhancing modeling and change support for process families through change patterns. In: Proceedings 14th international working conference on business process modeling, development, and support (BPMDS’13), LNBIP, vol 147, Valencia, pp 246–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann F, Bass L (2001) Managing variability in software architectures. In: Proceedings of symposium on software reusability, ACM, New York, pp 126–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer J, Buhl W, Giese C, Lehner T, Ocampo A, Puhlmann F, Richter E, Schnieders A, Weiland J, Weske M (2005) PESOA – process family engineering – modeling variant-rich processes. TR 18/2005, Hasso-Plattner-Institute, Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker M, Geyer L, Gilbert A, Becker K (2001) Comprehensive variability modeling to facilitate efficient variability treatment. In: Proceedings of 4th international workshop of product family engineering (PFE’01), LNCS, vol 2290, Bilbao, pp 294–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Lis L, Pfeiffer D, Räckers M (2007) A process modeling language for the public sector – the PICTURE approach. In: Wybrane Problemy Elektronicznej Gospodarki. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, pp 271–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk F (2009) Configurable process models. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk F, van der Aalst WMP, Jansen-Vullers MH, la Rosa M (2007) Configurable workflow models. Int J Cooper Inform Syst 17(2):177–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk F, Wagemakers T, Jansen-Vullers M, van der Aalst W, La Rosa M (2009) Configurable process models: experiences from a municipality case study. In: Proceedings CAiSE’09, LNCS, vol 5565, Amsterdam, pp 486–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerbach A (2010) Management of process variants. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ulm

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerbach A, Bauer T, Reichert M (2008a) Modellierung und Darstellung von Prozessvarianten in Provop. In: Proceedings Modellierung’08 (in German), LNI P-127, Berlin, pp 41–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerbach A, Bauer T, Reichert M (2008b) Context-based configuration of process variants. In: Proceedings 3rd international workshop on context-aware business process management (TCoB’08), Barcelona, pp 31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerbach A, Bauer T, Reichert M (2008c) Managing process variants in the process life cycle. In: Proceedings of 10th international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS’08), Barcelona, pp 154–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerbach A, Bauer T, Reichert M (2008d) Issues in modeling process variants with provop. In: Proceedings of BPM’08 workshops, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerbach A, Bauer T, Reichert M (2008e) Anforderungen an die Modellierung und Ausführung von Prozessvarianten. Datenbank Spektrum 24:48–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerbach A, Bauer T, Reichert M (2009) Guaranteeing soundness of configurable process variants in Provop. In: Proceedings 11th IEEE conference on commerce and enterprise computing (CEC’09), IEEE Computer Society, Vienna, pp 98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Halmans G, Pohl K (2003) Communicating the variability of a software-product family to customers. Softw Syst Model 2(1):15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Wen Y (2012) Design and management of flexible process variants using templates and rules. Int J Comput Ind 63(2):112–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künzle V, Reichert M (2012) Striving for object-aware process support: how existing approaches fit together. In: Proceedings 1st international symposium on data-driven process discovery and analysis (SIMPDA’11), LNBIP, vol 116, Campione d’Italia, pp 169–188

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa M, Lux J, Seidel S, Dumas M, ter Hofstede AHM (2007) Questionnaire-driven configuration of reference process models. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on advanced information systems engineering, LNCS, vol 4495, Trondheim, pp 424–438

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa M, Dumas M, ter Hofstede AHM, Mendling J, Gottschalk F (2008) Beyond control-flow: extending business process configuration to roles and objects. In: Proceedings of ER’08, Barcelona, Spain, pp 199–215

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa M, Dumas M, Uba R, Dijkman RM (2010) Merging business process models. In: Proceedings OTM conferences (1). LNCS, vol 6426, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, pp 96–113

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa M, Dumas M, ter Hofstede AHM, Mendling J (2011) Configurable multi-perspective business process models. Inf Syst 36(2):313–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz R, Reichert M (2007) IT support for healthcare processes – premises, challenges, perspectives. Data Knowl Engl 61(1):39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Reichert M, Wombacher A (2008a) Mining process variants: goals and issues. In: IEEE 5th international conference on services computing (SCC’08), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp 573–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Reichert M, Wombacher A (2008b) Discovering reference process models by mining process variants. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on web services (ICWS’08), IEEE Computer Society, Beijing, pp 45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Reichert M, Wombacher A (2011) Mining business process variants: challenges, scenarios, algorithms. Data Knowl Eng 70(5):409–434, Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann N, Wolf K (2011) Compact representations and efficient algorithms for operating guidelines. Fundam Inform 108(1–2):43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohrmann M, Reichert M (2012) Modeling business objectives for business process management. In: Proceedings S-BPM ONE 2012 scientific research, LNBIP, vol 104, Springer, Vienna, pp 106–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu R, Sadiq S (2006) On managing process variants as an information resource. Technical report no. 464, University of Queensland, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller D, Herbst J, Hammori M, Reichert M (2006) IT support for release management processes in the automotive industry. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on business process management (BPM’06), LNCS, vol 4102, Vienna, pp 368–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutschler B, Reichert N, Bumiller J (2008) Unleashing the effectiveness of process-oriented information systems: problem analysis, critical success factors and implications. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyberm C 38(3):280–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhlmann F, Schnieders A, Weiland J, Weske M (2005) PESOA – variability mechanisms for process models. Hasso-Plattner-Institute, Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert M (2012a) Process and data: two sides of the same coin. In: Proceedings 20th international conference on cooperative information systems (CoopIS’12), OTM 2012, Part I, LNCS, vol 7565, Rome, pp 2–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert M (2012b) Visualizing large business process models: challenges, techniques, applications. In: Proceedings BPM’12 workshops, LNBIP, vol 132, Tallinn, pp 725–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert M, Weber B (2012) Enabling flexibility in process-aware information systems: challenges, methods, technologies. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert M, Kolb J, Bobrik R, Bauer T (2012) Enabling personalized visualization of large business processes through parameterizable views. In: Proceedings 27th ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC’12), ACM, Trento, pp 1653–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinderle-Ma S, Reichert M, Weber B (2008) On the formal semantics of change patterns in process-aware information systems. In: Proceedings 27th international conference on conceptual modeling (ER’08), LNCS, vol 5231, Barcelona, pp 279–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann M, van der Aalst W (2007) A configurable reference modeling language. Inform Syst 32:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDS Scheer (2008) ARIS platform method 7.1. Technical Handbook, IDS Scheer GmbH, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres V, Zugal S, Weber B, Reichert M, Ayora C, Pelechano V (2012) A qualitative comparison of approaches supporting business process variability. In: Proceedings BPM’12 workshops, LNBIP, vol 132, Tallinn, pp 560–572

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst W, Basten T (2002) Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change. Theor Comput Sci 270(1–2):125–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst W, Dumas M, Gottschalk F, ter Hofstede AHM, La Rosa M, Mendling J (2008) Correctness-preserving configuration of business process models. In: Proceedings of fundamental approaches to software engineering, LNCS, vol 4961, Budapest, pp 46–61

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst W, Dumas M, Gottschalk F, ter Hofstede AHM, La Rosa M, Mendling J (2010a) Preserving correctness during business process model configuration. Formal Asp Comput 22(3–4):459–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst W, Lohmann N, La Rosa M, Xu J (2010b) Correctness ensuring process configuration: an approach based on partner synthesis. In: Proceedings BPM’10 conference, LNCS, vol 6336, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp 95–111

    Google Scholar 

  • VDA (2005) Engineering change management (ECM) – Part 1: engineering change request (ECR) Version 1.1, Recommendation 4965 T1

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke J (2007) Design principles for reference modelling – reusing information models by means of aggregation, specialization, instantiation, and analogy. In: Fettke P, Loos P (eds) Reference modelling for business systems analysis. Idea Group, Hershey, pp 47–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber B, Reichert M (2008) Refactoring process models in large process re-positories. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE’08), LNCS, vol 5074, Montpellier, pp 124–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber B, Reichert M, Rinderle S, Wild W (2006) Towards a framework for the agile mining of business processes. In: Proceedings of BPM’05 workshop, LNCS, vol 3812, Nancy, France, pp 191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber B, Rinderle S, Reichert M (2007) Change patterns and change support features in process- aware information systems. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE’07), LNCS, vol 4495, Trondheim, pp 574–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber B, Rinderle S, Reichert M (2008) Change patterns and change support features – enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data Knowl Eng 66(3):438–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber B, Reichert M, Wild W, Rinderle-Ma S (2009) Providing integrated life-cycle support in process-aware information systems. Int J Cooper Inform Syst (IJCIS) 18(1):115–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber B, Reichert M, Mendling J, Reijers H (2011) Refactoring large process model repositories. Comput Ind 62(5):467–486, Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyner GM, Lee J (2003) Defining specialization for process models. In: Malone TW, Crowston K, Herman GA (eds) Organizing business knowledge – the MIT process handbook. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 131–174

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Databases and Information Systems, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

    Manfred Reichert

  2. Daimler TSS GmbH, Ulm, Germany

    Alena Hallerbach

  3. Department for Information Management, Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany

    Thomas Bauer

Authors
  1. Manfred Reichert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alena Hallerbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Reichert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Systems, University of Liechtenstein, Vaduz, Liechtenstein

    Jan vom Brocke

  2. School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Michael Rosemann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reichert, M., Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T. (2015). Lifecycle Management of Business Process Variants. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds) Handbook on Business Process Management 1. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation