Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8001))

Abstract

This paper considers the question of the influence of a coalition of vertices, seeking to gain control (or majority) in local neighborhoods in a graph. A vertex v is said to be controlled by the coalition M if the majority of its neighbors are from M. Let Ruled(G,M) denote the set of vertices controlled by M in G. Previous studies focused on constructions allowing small coalitions to control many vertices, and provided tight bounds for the maximum possible size of Ruled(G,M) (as a function of |M|). This paper introduces the dual problem, concerning the existence and construction of graphs immune to the influence of small coalitions, i.e., graphs G for which Ruled(G,M) is small (relative to |M| again) for every coalition M. Upper and lower bounds are derived on the extent to which such immunity can be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alon, N., Spencer, J.H.: The Probabilistic Method. John Wiley & Sons, NY (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, E.: Dynamic Monopolies of Constant Size. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 83, 191–200 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bermond, J.-C., Bond, J., Peleg, D., Perennes, S.: Tight bounds on the size of 2-monopolies. In: Proc. 3rd Colloq. on Structural Information & Communication Complexity, pp. 170–179 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bermond, J.-C., Peleg, D.: The Power of Small Coalitions in Graphs. In: Proc. 2nd Colloq. on Structural Information & Communication Complexity, pp. 173–184 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bollobás, B.: Random Graphs. Academic Press (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bracha, G.: An o(logn) expected rounds randomized Byzantine generals algorithm. J. ACM 34, 910–920 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dwork, C., Peleg, D., Pippenger, N., Upfal, E.: Fault tolerance in networks of bounded degree. SIAM J. Computing 17, 975–988 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Flocchini, P., Geurts, F., Santoro, N.: Optimal irreversible dynamos in chordal rings. Discrete Applied Mathematics 113, 23–42 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Flocchini, P., Kralovic, R., Ruzicka, P., Roncato, A., Santoro, N.: On time versus size for monotone dynamic monopolies in regular topologies. J. Discrete Algorithms 1, 129–150 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Flocchini, P., Lodi, E., Luccio, F., Pagli, L., Santoro, N.: Dynamic monopolies in tori. Discrete Applied Mathematics 137, 197–212 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Molina, H., Barbara, D.: How to assign votes in a distributed system. J. ACM 32, 841–860 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gifford, D.K.: Weighted voting for replicated data. In: Proc. 7th Symp. Oper. Sys. Princip., pp. 150–159 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goles, E., Olivos, J.: Periodic behaviour of generalized threshold functions. Discrete Mathematics 30, 187–189 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall, M.: Combinatorial Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hassin, Y., Peleg, D.: Extremal Bounds for Proabilistic Polling in Graphs. In: Proc. 7th Colloq. on Structural Information & Communication Complexity, pp. 167–180 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hassin, Y., Peleg, D.: Distributed probabilistic polling and applications to proportionate agreement. Information and Computation 171, 248–268 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Jalote, P., Rangarajan, S., Tripathi, S.K.: Capacity of voting systems. Technical Report UMIACS-TR-91-118, University of Maryland (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kahale, N.: Eigenvalues and expansion of regular graphs. J. ACM 42, 1091–1106 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kutten, S., Peleg, D.: Fault-local distributed mending. J. of Algorithms 30, 144–165 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kutten, S., Peleg, D.: Tight fault-locality. SIAM J. on Computing 30, 247–268 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamport, L., Shostak, R., Pease, M.: The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Programming Languages and Systems 4, 382–401 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Linial, N., Peleg, D., Rabinovich, Y., Saks, M.: Sphere packing and local majorities in graphs. In: Proc. 2nd ISTCS, pp. 141–149. IEEE (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luccio, F., Pagli, L., Santoro, N.: Network decontamination in Presence of Local Immunity. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 18, 457–474 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Moran, G.: On the period-two-property of the majority operator in infinite graphs. Trans. American Math. Society 347, 1649–1667 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Moran, G.: Parametrization for stationary patterns of the r-majority operators on 0-1 sequences. Discrete Mathematics 132, 175–195 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Moran, G.: The r-majority vote action on 0-1 sequences. Discrete Mathematics 132, 145–174 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Peleg, D.: Local Majorities, Coalitions and Monopolies in Graphs: A Review. Theoretical Computer Science 282, 231–257 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Peleg, D.: Size Bounds for Dynamic Monopolies. Discrete Applied Mathematics 86, 263–273 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Poljak, S., Sura, M.: On periodical behaviour in societies with symmetric influences. Combinatorica 3, 119–121 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Poljak, S., Turzik, D.: On an application of convexity to discrete systems. Discrete Applied Mathematics 13, 27–32 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Sipser, M., Spielman, D.: Expander codes. In: 35th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 566–576 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spasojevic, M., Berman, P.: Voting as the optimal static pessimistic scheme for managing replicated data. IEEE Trans. Parallel & Distr. Systems 5, 64–73 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peleg, D. (2014). Immunity against Local Influence. In: Dershowitz, N., Nissan, E. (eds) Language, Culture, Computation. Computing - Theory and Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8001. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45321-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45321-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45320-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45321-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics