Skip to main content

Being Aware of Assumptions

  • Conference paper
  • 49 Accesses

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((2252,volume 287))

Abstract

We present a nonmonotonic logic, SWMC (after Shapiro, Wand, Martins and Cravo) intended to support belief revision systems. SWMC allows the use of default rules and exceptions to default rules. SWMC associates each derived wff with the hypotheses, and assumptions underlying its derivation, and can thus be used to support belief revision systems. SWMC distinguishes three kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from a set of hypotheses: sound conclusions, plausible conclusions, and conceivable conclusions.

This work was partially supported by Junta Nacional de Investigaçáo Científica e Tecnológica (JNICT), under Grant 87–107.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brewka G., “Cumulative Default Logic: In Defense of Nonmonotonic Inference Rules”, Proc. DRUMS (ESPRIT Basic Research Action 3085), Workshop RP1, Marseille, France, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravo M.R. and Martins J.P., “Defaults and Belief Revision: A Syntactical Approach”, Technical Report GIA 90/02, Lisbon, Portugal: Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, 1990a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravo M.R. and Martins J.P., “A Semantics for SWMC”, Technical Report GIA 90/03, Lisbon, Portugal: Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, 1990b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker U., “A Correct Non-Monotonic ATMS”, Proc. IJCAI-89, pp.1049–1054, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins J.P. and Shapiro S.C., “Reasoning in Multiple Belief Spaces”, Proc. IJCAI-83, pp.370–373, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins J.P. and Shapiro S.C., “A Model for Belief Revision”, Artificial Intelligence 35, pp.25–79, 1988.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Poole D., “A Logical Framework for Default Reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence 36, No. 1, pp.27–47, 1988.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter R., “A Logic for Default Reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence 13, No. 1–2, pp.81–132, 1980.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cravo, M.R., Martins, J.P. (1991). Being Aware of Assumptions. In: Kaindl, H. (eds) 7. Österreichische Artificial-Intelligence-Tagung / Seventh Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 287. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46752-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46752-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54567-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46752-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics