Skip to main content

Classifying Papers from Different Computer Science Conferences

  • Conference paper
Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8346))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper analyzes what stylistic characteristics differentiate different styles of writing, and specifically types of different A-level computer science articles. To do so, we compared various full papers using stylistic feature sets and a supervised machine learning method. We report on the success of this approach in identifying papers from the last 6 years of the following three conferences: SIGIR, ACL, and AAMAS. This approach achieves high accuracy results of 95.86%, 97.04%, 93.22%, and 92.14% for the following four classification experiments: (1) SIGIR / ACL, (2) SIGIR / AAMAS, (3) ACL / AAMAS, and (4) SIGIR / ACL / AAMAS, respectively. The Part of Speech (PoS) and the Orthographic sets were superior to all others and have been found as key components in different types of writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, I., Koutsias, J., Chandrinos, K., Paliouras, G., Spyropoulos, C.D.: An Evaluation of Naive Bayesian Anti-spam Filtering. CoRR, cs.CL/0006013 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Argamon, S., Shimoni, A.R.: Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing 17, 401–412 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Avneri, G.: Style-based Text Categorization: What Newspaper am I Reading? In: AAAI Workshop on Learning for Text (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Pennebaker, J.W., Schler, J.: Mining the Blogosphere: Age, Gender and the Varieties of Self-expression. First Monday 12(9) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J.: Classification and Regression Trees. In: Monterey, C.A. (ed.) Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software (1984) ISBN 978-0-412-04841-8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diederich, J., Kindermann, J., Leopold, E., Paass, G.: Authorship Attribution with support vector machines. Applied Intelligence 19(1-2), 109–123 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dikli, S.: An Overview of Automated Scoring of Essays. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 5(1), 1–35 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Egghe, L.: Untangling Herdan’s Law and Heaps’ Law: Mathematical and Informetric Arguments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(5), 702–709 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Foltz, P.W.: Latent Semantic Analysis for Text-based Research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 28(2), 197–202 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. HaCohen-Kerner, Y., Beck, H., Yehudai, E., Mughaz, D.: Stylistic Feature Sets as Classifiers of Documents According to their Historical Period and Ethnic Origin. Applied Artificial Intelligence 24(9), 847–862 (2010a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. HaCohen-Kerner, Y., Beck, H., Yehudai, E., Rosenstein, M., Mughaz, D.: Cuisine: Classification using Stylistic Feature Sets and/or Name-Based Feature Sets. JASIST 61(8), 1644–1657 (2010b)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA Data Mining Software: an Update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hota, S.R., Argamon, S., Chung, R.: Gender in Shakespeare: Automatic Stylistics Gender Character Classification using Syntactic, Lexical and Lemma Features. In: Digital Humanties and Computer Science (DHCS) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karlgren, J., Cutting, D.: Recognizing Text Genres with Simple Metrics using Discriminant Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1071–1075 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koppel, M., Argamon, S., Shimoni, A.R.: Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender. Lit. Linguist Computing 17(4), 401–412 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S.: Computational Methods in Authorship Attribution. JASIST 60(1), 9–26 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S.: Authorship Attribution in the Wild. Language Resources and Evaluation 45(1), 83–94 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lemaire, B., Dessus, P.: A System to Assess the Semantic Content of Student Essays. Educational Computing Research 24(3), 305–306 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lim, C., Lee, K., Kim, G.: Multiple Sets of Features for Automatic Genre Classification of Web Documents. Information Processing Management 41(5), 1263–1276 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luyckx, K.: Scalability Issues in Authorship Attribution. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universiteit Antwerpen. University Press, Brussels (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meretakis, D., Wüthrich, B.: Extending Naive Bayes Classifiers using Long Itemsets. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 165–174. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Novak, J., Raghavan, P., Tomkins, A.: Anti-aliasing on the Web. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp. 30–39. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Seeing Stars: Exploiting Class Relationships for Sentiment Categorization with Respect to Rating Scales. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 115–124. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up?: Sentiment Classification using Machine Learning Techniques. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2002), vol. 10, pp. 79–86 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Porter, M.: An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. Program 14(3), 130–137 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenfeld, A., Zuckerman, I., Azaria, A., Kraus, S.: Combining Psychological Models with Machine Learning to Better Predict People’s Decisions. Synthese 189, 81–93 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rokach, L., Maimon, O.: Data Mining with Decision Trees: Theory and Applications. World Scientific Pub. Co. Inc. (2008) ISBN 978-9812771711

    Google Scholar 

  28. Snyder, B., Barzilay, R.: Multiple Aspect Ranking using the Good Grief Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL, pp. 300–307 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stamatatos, E., Kokkinakis, G., Fakotakis, N.: Automatic Text Categorization in Terms of Genre and Author. Comput. Linguist. 26(4), 471–495 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N., Kokkinakis, G.: Computer-based Authorship Attribution without Lexical Measures. Computers and the Humanities 35(2), 193–214 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stamatatos, E.: Authorship Attribution based on Feature Set Subspacing Ensembles. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 15(5), 823–838 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stamatatos, E.: Author identification: Using Text Sampling to Handle the Class Imbalance Problem. Inf. Process. Manage. 44(2), 790–799 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stamatatos, E.: A Survey of Modern Authorship Attribution Methods. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology 60(3), 538–556 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C.D., Singer, Y.: Feature-rich Part-of-speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology (NAACL 2003), vol. 1, pp. 173–180. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tweedie, F.J., Baayen, R.H.: How Variable a Constant Be? Measures of Lexical Richness in Perspective. Computers and the Humanities 32(5), 323–352 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd Edition. Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems. Morgan Kaufmann (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yuan, Y., Shaw, M.J.: Induction of Fuzzy Decision Trees. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 69, 125–139 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Yule, U.: On Sentence Length as a Statistical Characteristic of Style in Prose with Application to Two Cases of Disputed Authorship. Biometrika 30, 363–390 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, L., Zhu, J., Yao, T.: An Evaluation of Statistical Spam Filtering Techniques. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing (TALIP) 3(4), 243–269 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

HaCohen-Kerner, Y., Rosenfeld, A., Tzidkani, M., Cohen, D.N. (2013). Classifying Papers from Different Computer Science Conferences. In: Motoda, H., Wu, Z., Cao, L., Zaiane, O., Yao, M., Wang, W. (eds) Advanced Data Mining and Applications. ADMA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8346. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53914-5_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53914-5_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53913-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53914-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics