Skip to main content

Validating Simulated Networks: Some Lessons Learned

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XIV (MABS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8235))

Abstract

Checking the network generated by a simulation against network data from the system being simulated holds out the promise of a fairly-strong validation. However, this poses some challenges. The nature of this task and its attended challenges are here discussed, and the outlines of a method for doing this sketched. This is illustrated using a synthetic and target network, applying increasingly detailed methods to elucidate the structure of these networks and hence make a tougher and more revealing comparison. We end with a discussion of the prospects and further challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A companion paper by the authors has been published as part of the proceedings of the 2013 European Social Simulation Association Conference (ESSA 2013); see Abbas et al. [1].

  2. 2.

    Excluding links from a node to itself and multiple links between pairs of nodes.

  3. 3.

    Since \( 2^{25 \times 24 \div 2} > 10^{80} \) (which is an estimate of the number of atoms in the universe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe).

  4. 4.

    See [19] for arguments against the Keep It Simple, Stupid (KISS) modelling approach.

  5. 5.

    There is already a growing interest in this regard, see e.g., [1, 3, 5, 10, 17, 20].

References

  1. Abbas, S.M.A., Alam, S.J., Edmonds, B.: Towards validating social network simulations. In: Bogumił, K., Koloch, G. (eds.) Advances in Social Simulation – Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Social Simulation Association. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 229, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbas, S.M.A.: Homophily, popularity and randomness: modelling growth of online social network. In: 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2013), pp. 135–142 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alam, S.J., Edmonds, B., Meyer, R.: Identifying structural changes in networks generated from agent-based social simulation models. In: Ghose, A., Governatori, G., Sadananda, R. (eds.) PRIMA 2007. LNCS, vol. 5044, pp. 298–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edmonds, B.: The use of models - making MABS more informative. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1979, pp. 15–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holzhauer, S., Krebs, F., Ernst, A.: Considering baseline homophily when generating spatial social networks for agent-based modelling. Comput. Math. Organ. Theor. 19, 128–150 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Papadopoulos, F., et al.: Popularity versus similarity in growing networks. Nature 489, 537–540 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Newman, M.E.J.: Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Traud, A.L., Kelsic, E.D., Mucha, P.J., Porter, M.A.: Comparing community structure to characteristics in online collegiate social networks. SIAM Rev. 53, 526–543 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Roth, C., Gargiulo, F., Bringe, A., Hamberger, K.: Random alliance networks. Soc. Netw. 35, 394–405 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kossinets, G., Watts, D.J.: Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science 311, 88–90 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Geller, A., Harrison, J.F., Revelle, M.: Growing social structure: an empirical multiagent excursion into kinship in rural North-West Frontier Province. Struct. Dyn. eJ. Anthropol. Relat. Sci. 5, 1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alam, S.J., Meyer, R.: Comparing two sexual mixing schemes for modelling the spread of HIV/AIDS. In: Simulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena, pp. 65–76 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geller, A., Moss, S.: Growing Qawm: an evidence-driven declarative model of Afghan power structures. Adv. Complex Syst. 11, 321–335 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krackhardt, D., Stern, R.N.: Informal networks and organizational crises : an experimental simulation. Soc. Psychol. 51, 123–140 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.: Collective dynamics of ‘small world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Legendi, R.O., Gulyas, L.: Agent-based dynamic network models: validation on empirical data. In: Bogumił, K., Koloch, G. (eds.) Advances in Social Simulation – Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Social Simulation Association. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 229, pp. 49–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moss, S., Edmonds, B.: Sociology and simulation: statistical and qualitative cross-validation. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 1095–1131 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Edmonds, B., Moss, S.: From KISS to KIDS – An ‘Anti-simplistic’ Modelling Approach. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Amblard, F., Quattrociocchi, W.: Social networks and spatial distribution. In: Edmonds, B., Meyer, R. (eds.) Simulating Social Complexity, pp. 401–430, Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grimm, V., Polhill, G., Touza, J.: Documenting social simulation models: the ODD protocol as a standard. In: Edmonds, B., Meyer, R. (eds.) Simulating Social Complexity, pp. 117–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to H. Van Dyke Parunak, the reviewers of this paper and the participants of the MABS 2013 workshop and the ESSA 2013 conference for their feedback and comments. This research was partially supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, grant number EP/H02171X/1 and also by the Economic and Social Research Council Secondary Data Analysis Initiative, grant number ES/K004549/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shah Jamal Alam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alam, S.J., Ali Abbas, S.M., Edmonds, B. (2014). Validating Simulated Networks: Some Lessons Learned. In: Alam, S., Parunak, H. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XIV. MABS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8235. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54783-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54783-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54782-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54783-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics