Skip to main content

An Empirical Test of Type-Indeterminacy in the Prisoner’s Dilemma

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8369))

Abstract

In this paper, we test the type indeterminacy hypothesis by analyzing an experiment that examines the stability of preferences in a Prisoner Dilemma with respect to decisions made in a context that is both payoff and informationally unrelated to that Prisoner Dilemma. More precisely we carried out an experiment in which participants were permitted to make promises to cooperate to agents they saw, followed by playing a Prisoner’s Dilemma game with another, independent agent. It was found that, after making a promise to the first agent, participants exhibited higher rates of cooperation with other agents. We show that a classical model does not account for this effect, while a type indeterminacy model which uses elements of the formalism of quantum mechanics is able to capture the observed effects reasonably well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As we show, with indeterminacy of the inner state, behavior (the action chosen in a decision situation, see below) shapes the state of preferences/attitude by force of a state transition process. Indeterminacy means intrinsic uncertainty about individual identity such that the individual may not know his own attitudes, preferences and beliefs. And as in self-perception theory, it is by observing his own action that he infers (learns) his state (of beliefs and preferences).

  2. 2.

    In Danilov and Lambert-Mogiliansky 2008, we investigate the axioms behind the Hilbert space model of QM and the implied state transition process to find that they have a natural interpretation in social sciences [13].

  3. 3.

    An example of a screen participants would see can be found in the online supplementary material at www.msu.edu/~kvampete/resources.html

References

  1. Lambert Mogiliansky, A., Zamir, S., Zwirn, H.: Type indeterminacy: a model of the KT (Kahneman–Tversky)-man. J. Math. Psychol. 53(5), 349–361 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Busemeyer, J., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: TI-games I: an exploration of type indeterminacy in strategic decision-making. PSE Working Papers 2009-07, PSE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aerts, D., Brokert, J., Gabora, L.: A case for applying an abstracted quantum formalism to cognition. New Ideas Psychol. 29(2), 136–146 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Busemeyer, J.R., Bruza, P.D.: Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Haven, E., Khrennikov, A.: Quantum Social Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Franco, R.: The conjunction fallacy and interference effects. J. Math. Psychol. 53(5), 415–422 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Trueblood, J.S., Busemeyer, J.R.: A quantum probability account of order effects in inference. Cogn. Sci. 35(8), 1518–1552 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Busemeyer, J.R., Matthew, M., Wang, Z.: An information processing explanation of the disjunction effect. In: Sun, R., Miyake, N. (eds.) The 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society and the 5th International Conference of Cognitive Science, pp. 131–135 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bem, D.J.: Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 6, pp. 1–62. Academic Press, (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bem, D.J.: Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychol. Rev. 74(3), 183–200 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Busemeyer, J.R.: Quantum type indeterminacy in dynamic decision-making: self-control through identity management. Games 3(2), 97–118 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Poundstone, W.: Prisoner’s Dilemma. Random House Digital Inc, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Danilov, V.I., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: Measurable systems and behavioral sciences. Math. Soc. Sci. 55(3), 315–340 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Matthew, M.R., Busemeyer, J.R.: The disjunction effect on a sliding scale (Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raftery, A.E.: Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol. Methodol. 25, 111–163 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter D. Kvam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kvam, P.D., Busemeyer, J.R., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A. (2014). An Empirical Test of Type-Indeterminacy in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. In: Atmanspacher, H., Haven, E., Kitto, K., Raine, D. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8369. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54943-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54943-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54942-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54943-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics