Skip to main content

Testing Solution Quality in Stochastic Programs

  • Conference paper
Book cover Operations Research Proceedings 2002

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings 2002 ((ORP,volume 2002))

  • 434 Accesses

Abstract

We describe a statistical procedure for testing the quality of a feasible candidate solut ion for an important class of stochastic programs. Quality is defined via the so-called optimality gap and th e procedure’s output is a confidence interval on this gap. We review a multiple-replications procedure for constructing the confidence interval. Then, we present a result that allows the procedure to be computationally simplified to a single-replication procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Bertocchi, J. Dupacova, and V. Moriggia. Sensitivity of bond portfolio’s behavior with respect to random movements in yield curve: A simulation study. Annals of Operations Research, 99:267–286, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Dupacova. On non-normal asymptotic behavior of optimal solutions for stochastic programming problems and on related problems of mathematical statistics. Kybemetika, 27:38–52, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Dupacova and R.J.-B. Wets. Asymptotic behavior of statistical estimators and of optimal solutions of stochastic optimization problems. The Annals of Stat istics, 16:1517–1549, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.L. Higle and S. Sen. Statistical verification of optimality conditions for stochastic programs with recourse. Annals of Opemtions Research, 30:215–240, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.L. Higle and S. Sen. Stochastic decomposition: an algorithm for two-stage linear programs with recourse. Mathematics of Operations Research, 16:650669, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.L. Higle and S. Sen. Statistical approximations for stochastic linear programming problems. Annals of Operations Research, 85:173–192, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A.S. Kenyon and D.P. Morton. Stochastic vehicle routing with random travel times. Transportation Science, 2001. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.J. King and RT. Rockafellar. Asymptotic theory for solutions in statistical estimation and stochastic programming. Mathematics of Operations Research, 18:148–162, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A.J. Kleywegt, A. Shapiro, and T. Homem-de-Mello. The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. Stochastic Programming E-Print Series, 1999. http://www.dochost.rz.hu-berlin.dehu-berlin.de/spepsj

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.J. King and R.J.-B. Wets. Epi-consistency of convex stochastic programs. Stochastics, 34:83–91, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.K. Mak, D.P. Morton, and R.K. Wood. Monte Carlo bounding techniques for determining solution quality in stochastic programs. Operations Research Letters, 24:47–56, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D.P. Morton and RK. Wood. On a stochastic knapsack problem and generalizations. In D.L. Woodruff, editor, Advances in Computational and Stochastic Optimization, Logic Programming, and Heuristic Search: Interfaces in Computer Science and Operations Research, pages 149--168. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. V.I. Norkin, G.Ch. Pflug, and A. Ruszczyriski. A branch and bound method for stochastic global optimization. Mathematical Programming, 83:425–450, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Popova and D. Morton. Adaptive stochastic manpower scheduling. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pages 661–668, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.M. Robinson. Analysis of sample-path optimization. Mathematics of Operations Research, 21:513–528, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Shapiro and T. Hornem-de-Mello. A simulation-based approach to two-stage stochastic programming with recourse. Mathematical Programming, 81:301–325, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Shapiro. Asymptotic properties of statistical estimators in stochastic programming. The Annals of Statistics, 17:841–858, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Shapiro. Stochastic programming by Monte Carlo simulation methods. Stochastic Programming E-Print Series, 2001.http://www.dochost.rz.hu-berlin.de/spepsj

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Verweij, S. Ahmed, A. Kleywegt, G. Nemhauser, and A. Shapiro. The sample average approximation method applied to stochastic vehicle routing problems: a computational study. (Working paper), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D.W. Watkins, Jr., D.P. Morton, and D.C. McKinney. Monte Carlo techniques for estimating solution quality in stochastic groundwater management models. In Proceedings of the XII International Conference on Computational Methods in Wat er Resources, Crete, pages 67–74, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Zakeri. Metaneos project: Verify optimization solver.http://www.unix.mcs.anl.gov/metaneosj/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morton, D.P. (2003). Testing Solution Quality in Stochastic Programs. In: Leopold-Wildburger, U., Rendl, F., Wäscher, G. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2002. Operations Research Proceedings 2002, vol 2002. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55537-4_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55537-4_64

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00387-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55537-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics