Skip to main content

ModelBuilder — an Automated General-to-specific Modelling Tool

  • Conference paper
Book cover Compstat

Abstract

The general-to-specific methodology (also known as the London School of Economics, LSE, methodology) is one of the most widely used methods of econometric model construction. Recently, specification search algorithms that automate some stages of the general-to-specific methodology have been proposed. In this paper we present an enhanced specification search algorithm. Extensions include cointegration analysis and automated construction of Error Correction Models. Although, specification search algo-rithms were originally developed to analyse how well does the LSE modelling approach work in controlled conditions, they are also a valuable tool for empirical research. As an empirical example, an automated construction of a demand function for narrow money in Austria is presented. Results are similar to those obtained in a more traditional way - a stable money demand function is found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, E. et al. (1999), Lapack Users’ Guide, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D.A. and Pantula, S.G. (1987), Determining the Order of Differencing in Autoregressive Processes. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 5 455–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, N.R. (1998), Empirical modeling of money demand, Empirical Economics, 23 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, N.R. and MacKinnon, J.G. (1999), Distribution of Error Correction Tests for Cointegration, International Finance Discussion Paper 655, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallasi, M. et al. (forthcoming), GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual. Network Theory Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B.E. (1999), Discussion of “Data mining reconsidered”. Econometrics Journal, 2 26–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayo, B. (2000), The Demand for Money in Austria. Empirical Economics, 25 581–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D.F. (1995), On the Interactions of Unit Roots and Exogeneity, Econometric Reviews, 4 383–419.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D.F. and Krolzig, H.-M. (1999), Improving on “Data mining reconsidered” by K.D. Hoover and S.J. Perez, Econometric Journal, 2 202–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K.D. and Perez, S.J. (1999), Data mining reconsidered: Encompassing and the general-to-specific approach to specification search. Econometrics Journal, 2 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka, R. and Gentleman, R. (1996), R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990), Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration - With Applications to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52 169–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig, H.-M. and Hendry, D.F. (2000), Computer automation of generalto-specific model selection procedures. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25 831–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig, H.-M. (2001), General-to-Specific Reductions of Vector Autoregressive Processes, Friedmann, R., L. Knueppel and H. Luetkepohl (eds.), Econometric Studies - A Festschrift in Honour of Joachim Frohn, Muenster: LIT Verlag, 129–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocaml. The Objective Caml Language. http://www.ocaml.org/.

  • Said, S.E and Dickey, D.A. (1985), Testing for unit root in autoregressive moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika, 71 599–608.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. (1978), Estimating the dimension of a model, Annals of Statistics, 6 461–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, C.R., Petitet A. and Dongarra, J.J., Automated Empirical Optimization of Software and the ATLAS Project, available at http://mathatlas.sourceforge.net/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kurcewicz, M. (2002). ModelBuilder — an Automated General-to-specific Modelling Tool. In: Härdle, W., Rönz, B. (eds) Compstat. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57489-4_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57489-4_71

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1517-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57489-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics