Skip to main content

Performance and Cost Comparison of Mirroring- and Parity-Based Reliability Schemes for Video Servers

  • Conference paper
Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS)

Part of the book series: Informatik Aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Abstract

In order to provide a reliable service, a video server must be able to reconstruct lost information during disk failure. We focus in this paper on reliability schemes that add redundancy within the server. We study two redundancy-based alternatives: mirroring-based schemes and parity-based schemes. We analyze in this paper these two alternatives and propose their adequate data layouts. We then compare them in terms of the server performance (throughput) and the costs of a single stream. Our results show that mirroring-based reliability is more cost effective than parity-based reliability. We obtain the, at first glance, surprising result that a server that uses mirroring, which doubles the storage requirement, has lower per stream costs than a server that uses parity-based reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. A. Tobagi, J. Pang, R. Baird, and M. Gang, “Streaming raid(tm) — a disk array management system for video files,“ in Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, (Anaheim, CA), August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Tewari, D. M. Dias, W. Kish, and H. Vin, “Design and performance tradeoffs in clustered video servers,“ in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS’96), (Hiroshima), pp. 144–150, June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Ozden et al., “Disk striping in video server environments,“ in Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Multimedia Systems, (Hiroshima, Japan), pp. 580–589, jun 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Gafsi and E. W. Biersack, “Data striping and reliablity aspects in distributed video servers,“ To appear in Cluster Computing: Networks, Software Tools, and Applications, November 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. W. Biersack and J. Gafsi, “Combined raid 5 and mirroring for cost-optimal fault-tolerant video servers,“ Subm. to IEEE Transactions on MM, Sept 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. A. Patterson, G. Gibson, and R. H. Katz, “A Case for Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Disks (RAID),“ in Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), (Chicago, IL), pp. 109–116, June 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Holland, G. Gibson, and D. Siewiorek, “Architectures and algorithms for online failure recovery in redundant disk arrays,“ Journal of Distributed and Parallel Databases, vol. 2, July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Bitton and J. Gray, “Disk shadowing,“ in Proc. of the 14th int. conference on VLDB, L. A., Aug. 1988, pp. 331–338, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Mourad, “Doubly-striped disk mirroring: Reliable storage for video servers,“ Multimedia, Tools and Applications, vol. 2, pp. 253–272, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Bolosky et al., “The tiger video fileserver,“ in 6th Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, (Zushi, Japan), Apr. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. N. Doganata and A. N. Tantawi, “Making a cost-effective video server,“ IEEE Multimedia, vol. 1, pp. 22–30, Winter 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. M. Chen, E. K. Lee, G. A. Gibson, R. H. Katz, and D. A. Patterson, “Raid: High-performance, reliable secondary storage,“ ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 26, pp. 145–185, June 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. K. Lee, Performance Modeling and Analysis of Disk Arrays. PhD thesis, University of California at Berkley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. M. Chen, E. K. Lee, G. A. Gibson, R. H. Katz, and D. A. Patterson, “Raid: High-performance, reliable secondary storage,“ ACM Computing Surveys, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Holland, G. Gibson, and D. Siewiorek, “Architectures and algorithms for online failure recovery in redundant disk arrays,“ Journal of Distributed and Parallel Databases, vol. 2, July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Gafsi and E. W. Biersack, “Performance and reliability trade-offs for replicated video ser vers,“ Subm. to the Parallel and Distributed Computing and Practices Journal, Sept 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gafsi, J., Biersack, E.W. (1999). Performance and Cost Comparison of Mirroring- and Parity-Based Reliability Schemes for Video Servers. In: Steinmetz, R. (eds) Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS). Informatik Aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60111-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60111-8_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65597-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60111-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics