Abstract
Emerging organisational alternatives to hierarchy and extreme division of labour are changing the landscape of the organisational culture and practice. Most concepts march far away from the taylor-fordist tradition and have one element in common: they are the result of focusing on processes rather than on functional responsibilities [3,4,12,13]. These processes are either primary processes or operational processes, i.e., material, informational and relational/communicative business processes [11,12,13], or the change processes, i.e., continuous improvement and redesign processes.
All processes are always challenged by the dramatic changes within the general setting (competition, new technologies, new public regulations, etc.) as well as by local breakdowns (accidents, disturbances, variances, etc.). In all cases real persons in the organisation have the duty to detect, avoid and absorb changes and breakdowns and to re-design or reassess the process and the way to deal with change and breakdowns. Re-design and control of a process is possible only if people have enough knowledge of the process. People working in processes have to have the process in their mind to guarantee the achievement of its goals.
Management structures and process innovation (process management structures) are becoming important. Process owners, project team, continuous improvement teams, quality teams and others are examples of these tendencies. Meaningful business process are often run by new patterns of macrostructure like project structures, divisional structures, brand organisations, matrix organisations, etc.
The developments from Tayloristic work organisations towards process-oriented structures will be shown as they are presently being demanded and tested. The scope of the paper is to motivate the analysis and design of business processes as co-operative workflows in the language/action perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agostini, A.; De Michelis, G.; Grasso, M.A.; Patriarca, S. (1993). Reengineering a Business Process with an Innovative Workflow Management Systems: A Case Study. In Kaplan, S. (ed.). Conference on Organizational Computing Systems. ACM, New York: 154–165
Bignoli, C.; De Michelis, G.; Tinini, R. (1991). UTUCS: A Support for Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication. In Gorling K.; Sattler C. (eds.). International Workshop on CSCW. Informatik: Informationen–Report, No 4/91, Institut fair Informatik und Rechentechnik, 9–11 April, Berlin: 74–84
Butera, F.; Schael, T. (1997). The Renaissance of Socio-technical System Design. In Mambrey; Paetau, M.; Prinz, W.; Wulf, V. (eds). Self-Organisation: A Challenge to CSCW. Springer: forthcoming
Butera, F.; Schael, T. (1997b). The convergence toward an new socio-technical system approach. Elsevier Science Publishers, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI `97, San Francisco, August 24–29
Celano, S.; Lombardi, G.; Schael, T. (1997). Reti d’impegni e coordinamento elettronico.: Un caso di reengineering. In Sistemi & Impresa, n°5, Giugno `97: 33–40
De Cindio, F.; De Michelis, G.; Simone, C. (1988). Computer-Based Tools in the Language-Action Perspective. In Speth, R. (ed.). EUTECO 88: Research in Networks and Distributed Applications. North Holland, Amsterdam: 243–258
Denning, P.J.; Medina-Mora, R. (1994). Case Study: George Mason University. In White, T.E.; Fischer, L. (eds.). New Tools for New Times: The Workflow Paradigm. Future Strategies Inc., Alameda, California: 235–251
Di Stefano, F.; Schael, T.; Viviani, D.; Zeller, B. (1995). Business process reengineering nelle aziende di servizi - alcuni casi italiani. National conference on ‘Lavoro e Organizzazione nel Mondo dei Cambiamenti’, AISL - Associazione Italiana di Studio del Lavoro, Bologna, 15–16 June
Flores, G.; Bitar, J.; Vieira, L.; Kirschner, M. (1996). Cemex: Shifting Attitudes Between Staff and Customers. In Lloyd, P.; Whitehead, R. (eds). Transforming Organisations Through Groupware. Springer, London
Marshak, R.T. (1993). Young & Rubicam improves productivity with workflow. Workgroup Computing Report. Patricia Seybold Group, Boston, Massachusetts, 16–5: 12–20
Medina-Mora, R.; Winograd, T.; Flores, R.; Flores, C.F. (1992). The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology. In Turner, J.; Kraut, R. (eds). Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 31 October-4 November, Toronto, Canada: 281–288
Schael, T. (1996). Workflow Management Systems for Process Organisations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1096, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
Schael, T. (1997). Théorie et practique du workflow - Des processus mEtier renouvelÈs. Springer, Paris/Heidelberg
Schael, T.; Zenié, A. (1996). Analyzing and redesigning a remote sensing business process for rapid estimates of agriculture in Europe. Information Technology & People, Volume 9, Issue 1, MCB University Press: 19–41
Winograd, T. (1987). A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. Human-Computer Interaction, 3–1 (1987/88): 3–30
Winograd, T.; Flores, C.F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schael, T. (1997). Cooperative Processes and Workflow Management for Enterprise Integration. In: Kosanke, K., Nell, J.G. (eds) Enterprise Engineering and Integration. Research Reports Esprit. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60889-6_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60889-6_53
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63402-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60889-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive