Skip to main content

Bayesian Integration of Uncertain and Conflicting Evidence

  • Conference paper
GWAI-89 13th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((2252,volume 216))

Abstract

Often numeric values assigned to the probability of some fact or rule axe only vague estimates. Using Bayesian analysis the probabilities themselves may be treated as random quantities whose accuracy can be described by a second order probability measure. For the probabilities of consequences a posterior distribution may be derived, which reflects the uncertainty of the input probabilities. The algorithm discussed in this paper is based on an approximate sample representation of the basic probabilities. This sample is continuously modified by a stochastic simulation procedure, the Metropolis algorithm, and the sequence of successive samples yields the desired posterior distribution. The procedure is able to pool inconsistent probabilities according to their reliability and is applicable to general inference networks with arbitrary structure including loops and cycles. The properties of the approach axe demonstrated by some numerical experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berger, J.O. (1980): Statistical Decision Theory, Springer Verlag, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, P. (1985): In Defense of Probability, IJCAI 85, p. 1002–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, P. (1988): An inquiry to computer understanding, Computational Intelligence Vol. 4, p. 58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey, N.C. (1986): Inductive inference and the representation of Uncertainty, in Kanal, L.N., Lemmer J.F. (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, pp. 393–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Genest, C., Zidek, J.V. (1986): Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography, Statistical Science, Vol. 1, pp. 114–148

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J.A. (1983) Bayes Theory, Springer, New York Hogarth, R.M. (1987): Judgement and Choice, 2nd edition, Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalos, M.H., Whitlock, P.A. (1986): Monte Carlo Methods, Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen, S.L., Spiegelhalter, D.J. (1988): Local Computations with Probabilities on Graphical Structures and their Application to Expert Systems, J. Royal Statistical Soc., Ser. B, Vol. 50, pp. 157–224

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D.V., Tversky, A., Brown, R.V. (1979): On the reconciliation of probability assessments, Journal of the Royal Statistical Soc., Ser. A., Vol. 142, pp. 146–180

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, D., Romeo, F., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (1986): Convergence and finite time behaviour of simulated annealing, Adv. Appl. Probability Vol. 18, p. 747–771

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N.J. (1986): Probabilistic Logic, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 28, 71–87

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Paass, G. (1986): Consistent Evaluation of Uncertain Reasoning Systems, in Proc. 6th Int. Workshop on Expert Systems and their Applications, Avignon, pp. 73 - 94

    Google Scholar 

  • Paass, G. (1988): Probabilistic Logic, in Smets, P., Mamdani, A., Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.) Nonstandard Logics for Automated Reasoning, Academic Press, London, pp. 213–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1985): How to do with probabilities what people say you can’t, Proc. 2nd Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Applications, IEEE CS Press, North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1986): Fusion, Propagation, and Structuring in Belief Networks, Artificial Intelligence Vol. 31, pp. 241–288

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1987): Evidential Reasoning using stochastic simulation of Causal Models, Artificial Intelligence Vol. 32, pp. 245–257

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J.R. (1983): INFERNO, A Cautious Approach to Uncertain Reasoning, Computer J., Vol. 26, pp. 255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paaß, G. (1989). Bayesian Integration of Uncertain and Conflicting Evidence. In: Metzing, D. (eds) GWAI-89 13th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 216. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75100-4_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75100-4_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51743-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75100-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics