Abstract
Often numeric values assigned to the probability of some fact or rule axe only vague estimates. Using Bayesian analysis the probabilities themselves may be treated as random quantities whose accuracy can be described by a second order probability measure. For the probabilities of consequences a posterior distribution may be derived, which reflects the uncertainty of the input probabilities. The algorithm discussed in this paper is based on an approximate sample representation of the basic probabilities. This sample is continuously modified by a stochastic simulation procedure, the Metropolis algorithm, and the sequence of successive samples yields the desired posterior distribution. The procedure is able to pool inconsistent probabilities according to their reliability and is applicable to general inference networks with arbitrary structure including loops and cycles. The properties of the approach axe demonstrated by some numerical experiments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berger, J.O. (1980): Statistical Decision Theory, Springer Verlag, New York
Cheeseman, P. (1985): In Defense of Probability, IJCAI 85, p. 1002–1009
Cheeseman, P. (1988): An inquiry to computer understanding, Computational Intelligence Vol. 4, p. 58–66
Dalkey, N.C. (1986): Inductive inference and the representation of Uncertainty, in Kanal, L.N., Lemmer J.F. (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, pp. 393–397
Genest, C., Zidek, J.V. (1986): Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography, Statistical Science, Vol. 1, pp. 114–148
Hartigan, J.A. (1983) Bayes Theory, Springer, New York Hogarth, R.M. (1987): Judgement and Choice, 2nd edition, Wiley, Chichester
Kalos, M.H., Whitlock, P.A. (1986): Monte Carlo Methods, Wiley, New York
Lauritzen, S.L., Spiegelhalter, D.J. (1988): Local Computations with Probabilities on Graphical Structures and their Application to Expert Systems, J. Royal Statistical Soc., Ser. B, Vol. 50, pp. 157–224
Lindley, D.V., Tversky, A., Brown, R.V. (1979): On the reconciliation of probability assessments, Journal of the Royal Statistical Soc., Ser. A., Vol. 142, pp. 146–180
Mitra, D., Romeo, F., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (1986): Convergence and finite time behaviour of simulated annealing, Adv. Appl. Probability Vol. 18, p. 747–771
Nilsson, N.J. (1986): Probabilistic Logic, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 28, 71–87
Paass, G. (1986): Consistent Evaluation of Uncertain Reasoning Systems, in Proc. 6th Int. Workshop on Expert Systems and their Applications, Avignon, pp. 73 - 94
Paass, G. (1988): Probabilistic Logic, in Smets, P., Mamdani, A., Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.) Nonstandard Logics for Automated Reasoning, Academic Press, London, pp. 213–252
Pearl, J. (1985): How to do with probabilities what people say you can’t, Proc. 2nd Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Applications, IEEE CS Press, North Holland
Pearl, J. (1986): Fusion, Propagation, and Structuring in Belief Networks, Artificial Intelligence Vol. 31, pp. 241–288
Pearl, J. (1987): Evidential Reasoning using stochastic simulation of Causal Models, Artificial Intelligence Vol. 32, pp. 245–257
Quinlan, J.R. (1983): INFERNO, A Cautious Approach to Uncertain Reasoning, Computer J., Vol. 26, pp. 255–269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Paaß, G. (1989). Bayesian Integration of Uncertain and Conflicting Evidence. In: Metzing, D. (eds) GWAI-89 13th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 216. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75100-4_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75100-4_47
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51743-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75100-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive