Skip to main content

Inferenzen bei Ungewißheit in Expertensystemen

Ein kognitionspsychologischer Beitrag

  • Conference paper
Book cover GWAI-89 13th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((2252,volume 216))

Zusammenfassung

Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Problem der Kompatibilität menschlicher Inferenz bei Ungewißheit mit modellgegebener Inferenz nach verschiedenen Ungewißheitsmodellen wird dargestellt. Inkompatibilitäten können einerseits auf kognitive “biases”, andererseits auf kontingente und folglich modifizierbare Modellannahmen zurückgehen. Implikationen für den Einsatz in Expertensystemen werden angesprochen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Baldwin, J. F. (1986): Support logic programming. In: A. Jones, A. Kaufmann, H.-J. Zimmermann (eds.): Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications, NATO ASI Series, Dordrecht, D. Reidel, pp. 133–170.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1987): Properties of measures of information in evidence and possibility theories. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 24, 2, pp. 161–182.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, W. (1982): Conservatism in human information processing. In: Kahneman, Slovic, Tversky (eds.): Judgment under uncertainty, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 359–369.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman, I.R. & Nguyen, H.T. (1985): Uncertainty Models for Knowledge-based Systems; Amsterdam, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (eds., 1982 ): Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scholz, R. W. (1986): Cognitive Strategies in stochastic Thinking. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spies, M. (1989): Syllogistic inference under uncertainty—An empirical contribution to uncertainty modelling in knowledge-based systems with fuzzy quantifiers and support logic. München, Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spies, M. (1989a): A model of imprecise quantification that accounts for human biases. Proc. 3rd IPSA World Conference, U Washington, Seattle, WA, August, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zadeh, L.A. (1983): A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comp. & Maths, with Applic. 9, pp. 149–184.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Zadeh, L.A. (1985): Syllogistic reasoning in fuzzy logic and its application to usuality and reasoning with dispositions, Institute of Cognitive Studies Report 34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Spies, M. (1989). Inferenzen bei Ungewißheit in Expertensystemen. In: Metzing, D. (eds) GWAI-89 13th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 216. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75100-4_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75100-4_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51743-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75100-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics