Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ist Cobol Unsterblich?

  • Chapter
Book cover Programmiersprachen

Part of the book series: Informatik - Fachberichte ((INFORMATIK,volume 12))

  • 34 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Praktische Programmierung ist noch immer zu mehr als 50% COBOL-Programmierung, es folgen PL/1, Assembler und FORTRAN. Neuere Sprachen werden so gut wie nicht verwendet, allenfalls PASCAL beginnt in Anwenderkreisen langsam bekannt zu werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. G. Atkinson, “The non-desirability of structured programming in user languages”, Sigplan Notices 12 (July 1977), S. 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Denert, “Specification and design of dialogue systems with state diagrams”. Int. Comp. Symposium (ICS), Liege (5.-7. April 1977), S. 417.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J.B. Holton, “Are the new programming techniques being used?”. Datamation 23 (July 1977), S. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  4. “Der Bedarf an interaktiven Programmiersystemen”, Infratest Wirtschaftsforschung, München (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.A. Jackson, “Principles of program design”, A.P.I.C. Studies in Data Processing 12, Academic Press, London (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B.W. Kernighan, P.J.Plauger, “The elements of programming style”, Mc Graw-Hill, New York (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Nassi, B. Shneidermann, “Flow chart techniques for structured programming”, Sigplan Notices 8 (1973), S. 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Naur, “Programming languages, natural languages, and mathematics”, CACM 18 (1975), S. 676.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. D.T. Ross, “Homilies for humble standards”, CACM 19 (1976), S. 595.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.T. Ross, “Structured analysis (SA): a language for communicating ideas”, IEEE Trans. Software Eng. SE-3 (Jan. 1977), S. 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SOFTLAB GmbH., Deutschland

    Peter Schnupp

Authors
  1. Peter Schnupp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl A für Informatik der TU Carola Wilhelmina, Gaußstraße 12, Postfach 33 29, 3300 Braunschweig, Deutschland

    Klaus Alber

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schnupp, P. (1978). Ist Cobol Unsterblich?. In: Alber, K. (eds) Programmiersprachen. Informatik - Fachberichte, vol 12. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87956-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87956-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-08680-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-87956-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation