Skip to main content

Relational Matching — Problems, Techniques, and Applications

  • Conference paper
Book cover Mustererkennung 1984

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((INFORMATIK,volume 87))

Abstract

A relational description is a set of relations that can be used to represent an object model or to describe the features, properties, and interrelationships extracted from an image. Given two such relational descriptions, the relational distance between them tells us how similar are two models (for grouping purposes) or how well a part of an image matches a particular model (for identification purposes). Furthermore, once two descriptions have been judged similar enough by their relational distance, the mapping derived from the matching process can be used to determine symbolic differences between them that may aid in the process of image analysis. In this paper we will define all of the above concepts and then discuss some matching procedures — both in general and for some specific matching problems we are encountering in an industrial inspection task. We will also discuss the complex models being used for this task and the problem of organizing object models in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrow, Ambler, and Burstall, “Some Techniques for Recognizing Structures in Pictures”, in Frontiers of Pattern Recognition, Ed. S. Watanabe, New York, Academic Press, 1972, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, R.A., “Symbolic Reasoning Among Three-Dimensional Models and Two-Dimensional Images”, Artificial Intelligence, Special Vol. on Computer Vision, AI 17, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, J.K. and T.S. Huang, “Image Recognition by Matching Relational Structures”, Proceedings of IEEE Pattern Recognition and Image Processing, 1981, pp. 542–547.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, L.S., “Shape Matching Using Relaxation Techniques”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. PAMI-1, No. 1, January 1979, pp. 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feustel, C.D. and L.G. Shapiro, “The Nearest Neighbor Problem in an Abstract Metric Space”, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 1, No. 2, December 1982, pp. 125–128.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Freuder, E.C. , “Synthesizing Constraint Expression”, CACM, Vol. 21, No. 11, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gaschnig, J., “A General Backtrack Algorithm that Eliminates Most Redundant Tests”, Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haralick, R.M. and G. Elliot, “Increasing Tree Search Efficiency for Constraint Satisfaction Problems”, Proceeding of the 6th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haralick, R.M. and L.G. Shapiro, “The Consistent Labeling Problem: Part I”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. PAMI-1, No. 2, April 1979, pp. 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mackworth, A. , “Consistency in Network of Relations”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 8, 1977, pp. 99–118.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Marr, D. and H.K. Nishihara, Spatial Disposition of Axes in a Generalized Cylinder Representation of Objects that do not Encompass the Viewer, MIT AI Lab, Memo. No. 341, December 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Montanari, U., “Networks of Constraints: Fundamental Properties and Applications to Picture Processing”, Information Sciences, Vol. 7, 1974, pp. 95–132.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mulgaonkar, P.G., Shapiro, L.G. and R.M. Haralick, Identification of Man-Made Objects Using Geometric and Relational Constraints, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Department of Computer Science, September 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nevatia, R. and T.O. Binford, “Description and Recognition of Curved Objects”, Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1977, pp. 77–90.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenfeld, A., Hummel, R.A. and S.W. Zucker, “Scene Labeling by Relaxation Operations”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol CMS-6, No. 6, June 1976, pp. 420–433.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanfelieu, Alberto and K.S. Fu, “A Distance Measure Between Attributed Relational Graphs for Pattern Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-13, No. 3, May/June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schneier, M., “A Compact Relational Structure Representation”, in Workshop on the Representation of Three-Dimensional Objects, R. Bajcy, Director, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, May 1–2, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shapiro, L.G., J.D. Moriarty, P.G. Mulgaonkar, and R. M. Haralick, “A Generalized Blob Model for Three-Dimensional Object Representation”, IEEE Workshop on Picture Data Description and Management, Asilomar, CA, August 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro, L.G., “A Structural Model of Shape”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. PAMI-2, No. 2, March 1980, pp. 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shapiro, L.G. and R.M. Haralick, “Structural Descriptions and Inexact Matching”, to appear in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shapiro, L.G., J.D. Moriarty, R.M. Haralick, and P.G. Mulgaonkar, Matching Three-Dimensional Objects Using a Relational Paradigm, TR-CS80014R, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, December 1980, Revised January 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro, L.G. and R.M. Haralick, “Organization of Relational Models for Scene Analysis”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. PAMI-4, No. 6, November 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shapiro, L.G. and R.M. Haralick, “Decomposition of TwoDimensional Shapes by Graph-Theoretic Clustering”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-1, No. 1, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro, L.G. and R.M. Haralick, “A Hierarchical Relational Model for Automated Inspection Tasks”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics, Atlanta, 1984, pp. 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ullman, J.R., “An Algorithm for Subgraph Homomorphisms”, JACM, Vol. 23, January 1976, pp. 31–42.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Waltz, D., “Understanding Line Drawings of Scenes with Shadows”, in The Psychology of Computer Vision, ed. P. Winston, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975, pp. 19–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shapiro, L.G. (1984). Relational Matching — Problems, Techniques, and Applications. In: Kropatsch, W. (eds) Mustererkennung 1984. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 87. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02390-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02390-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-13859-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02390-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics