Abstract
We focus on the evolution of interfirm innovation networks which are composed of and driven by heterogeneous actors that follow a number of well-defined cooperation partner selection strategies. For this purpose, we simulate micro level firm behaviour which shapes the macro level network patterns. In order to analyse the micro-macro link we build an agent-based simulation model (ABSM) which allows us to test causal relationships between firm strategies and the emerging network structures. With this model we analyse the structural consequences of homophily, reputation and cohesion mechanisms in a situation of information scarcity. We start with a simple model which is in a next step extended by adding a market mechanism which links the knowledge base of a firm with the reward a firm receives and with the incentives to cooperate. We show that (a) a transitive closure mechanism combined with a tendency for preferential attachment produces networks that show both, small world characteristics as well as a power law degree distribution; (b) diversity in the selection of cooperation partners is an important determinant of innovative performance if we consider an evolving network.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Small world networks are characterized by a small average shortest path length and a relatively high level of clustering (Watts and Strogatz 1998).
- 2.
According to this scheme, the first character specifies the number of mutual dyads, the second character gives the number of asymmetric dyads, the third character displays the number of null-dyads, and the last character gives a further characterization of how the ties are directed to each other within these specific isomorphism classes by using the characters “D” (for down), “U” (for up), “T” (for transitive) and “C” (for cyclic). For further details, see Wasserman and Faust (1994).
References
Aghion P, Griffith R (2005) Competition and growth: reconciling theory and evidence, Zeuthen lectures. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Ahrweiler P, Pyka A, Gilbert N (2004) Simulating knowledge dynamics in innovation networks (SKIN). In: Leombruni R, Richiardi M (eds) The agent-based computational approach. World Scientific Press, Singapore
Ahuja G (2000) The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strat Manag J 21(3):317–343
Arthur WB (1999) Complexity and the economy. Science 284(5411):107–109
Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512
Barabasi AL, Albert R (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47–97
Bloch H, Finch JH (2009) Firms and industries in evolutionary economics: lessons from Marshall, Young, Steindl and Penrose. J Evol Econ 20(1):139–162
Cowan R, Jonard N (2004) Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. J Econ Dynam Contr 28(8):1557–1575
Davis JA (1970) Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. Am Sociol Rev 35(5):843–851
Dopfer K (2005) The evolutionary foundations of economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dosi G (1988) Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J Econ Lit 26(3):1120–1171
Gay B, Dousset B (2005) Innovation and network structural dynamics: study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry. Res Pol 34(10):1457–1475
Geroski P (1995) Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability. In: Stoneman P (ed) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell, Oxford
Gerybadze A (2004) Technologie-und Innovationsmanagement: Strategie, Organisation und Implementierung. Vahlen, München
Gilbert N (1997) A simulation of the structure of academic science. Socio Res Online 2(2):3, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/3.html
Gilbert N, Pyka A, Ahrweiler P (2001) Innovation networks – a simulation approach. J Artif Soc Soc Simulat 4(3):1–13
Gilbert N, Ahrweiler P, Pyka A (2007) Learning in innovation networks: some simulation experiments. Phys A 378(1):100–109
Giuliani E (2010) Network dynamics in regional clusters: the perspective of an emerging economy. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1014
Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: a formal theory and empirical test. Am J Sociol 107(5):1143–1178
Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91:481–510
Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strat Manag J 19(4):293–317
Gulati R (2007) Managing network resources: alliances, affiliations and other relational assets. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hagedoorn J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res Pol 31(4):477–492
Hanusch H, Pyka A (2007) Elgar companion to neo-Schumpeterian economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Hodgson GM, Samuels WJ, Tool MR (1994) The Elgar companion to institutional and evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar, Aldershot
Holland JH (1996) Hidden order: how adaptation builds complexity. Basic Books, New York
Holland PW, Leinhardt S (1971) Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comp Group Stud 2(2):107–124
Holland PW, Leinhardt S (1977) A dynamic model for social networks. J Math Sociol 1:5–20
Kenis P, Oerlemans LAG (2008) The social network perspective: understanding the structure of cooperation. In: Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Ring PS (eds) The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin, New York
Lazega E, Mounier L, Snijders T, Tubaro P (2012) Norms, status and the dynamics of advice networks: a case study. Soc Networks 34(3):323–332
Loasby BJ (2001) Time, knowledge and evolutionary dynamics: why connections matter. J Evol Econ 11(4):393–412
Malerba F (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res Pol 31(2):247–264
Malerba F, Vonortas NS (2009) Innovation networks in industry. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics: an introductory volume. Macmillan, London
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 27:415–444
Morone P, Taylor R (2004) Small world dynamics and the process of knowledge diffusion: the case of the metropolitan area of greater Santiago De Chile. J Artif Soc Soc Simulat 7(2):1–28
Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Orsenigo L, Pammolli F, Riccaboni M (2001) Technological change and network dynamics, Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry. Res Pol 30(3):485–508
Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Podolny JM (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Adm Sci Q 39(3):458–483
Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm Sci Q 41(1):116–145
Powell WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Am J Sociol 110(4):1132–1205
Price DS (1976) A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J Am Soc Inf Sci 27(5):292–306
Pyka A (1999) Der kollektive Innovationsprozeß eine theoretische Analyse informeller Netzwerke und absorptiver Fähigkeiten. Duncker und Humblot, Berlin
Pyka A, Fagiolo G (2005) Agent-based modelling: a methodology for neo-Schumpeterian economics. In: Hanusch H, Pyka A (eds) The Elgar companion on neo-Schumpeterian economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Pyka A, Gilbert N, Ahrweiler P (2007) Simulating knowledge-generation and distribution processes in innovation collaborations and networks. Cybern Syst 38(7):667–693
Sankar CS, Boulton WR, Davidson NW, Snyder CA, Ussery RW (1995) Building a world-class alliance: the universal card: TSYS case. Acad Manag Exec 9(2):20–29
Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Manag Sci 53(7):1113–1126
Schumpeter JA (1911) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker und Humblot, Leipzig
Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q 42(1):35–67
Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organ Sci 8(2):109–125
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442
Winter SG (1988) On coase, competence, and the corporation. J Law Econ Organ 4(1):163–180
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Müller, M., Buchmann, T., Kudic, M. (2014). Micro Strategies and Macro Patterns in the Evolution of Innovation Networks: An Agent-Based Simulation Approach. In: Gilbert, N., Ahrweiler, P., Pyka, A. (eds) Simulating Knowledge Dynamics in Innovation Networks. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43508-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43508-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43507-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43508-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)