Skip to main content

Network Cost-Sharing without Anonymity

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8768))

Abstract

We consider network cost-sharing games with non-anonymous cost functions, where the cost of each edge is a submodular function of its users, and this cost is shared using the Shapley value. The goal of this paper is to identify well-motivated equilibrium refinements that admit good worst-case approximation bounds. Our primary results are tight bounds on the cost of strong Nash equilibria and potential function minimizers in network cost-sharing games with non-anonymous cost functions, parameterized by the set \(\mathcal{C}\) of allowable submodular cost functions. These two worst-case bounds coincide for every set \(\mathcal{C}\), and equal the summability parameter introduced in [31] to characterize efficiency loss in a family of cost-sharing mechanisms. Thus, a single parameter simultaneously governs the worst-case inefficiency of network cost-sharing games (in two incomparable senses) and cost-sharing mechanisms. This parameter is always at most the kth Harmonic number \(\mathcal{H}_k \approx \ln k\), where k is the number of players, and is constant for many function classes of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E., Wexler, T., Roughgarden, T.: The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. SIAM Journal on Computing 38(4), 1602–1623 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Tardos, E., Wexler, T.: Near-optimal network design with selfish agents. Theory of Computing 4(1), 77–109 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Asadpour, A., Saberi, A.: On the inefficiency ratio of stable equilibria in congestion games. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 545–552. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Aumann, R.J.: Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games 4, 287–324 (1959)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachrach, Y., Syrgkanis, V., Tardos, E., Vojnovic, M.: Strong price of anarchy and coalitional dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.2537 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bilò, V., Bove, R.: Bounds on the price of stability of undirected network design games with three players. Journal of Interconnection Networks 12, 1–17 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilò, V., Caragiannis, I., Fanelli, A., Monaco, G.: Improved lower bounds on the price of stability of undirected network design games. In: Kontogiannis, S., Koutsoupias, E., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) SAGT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6386, pp. 90–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Blume, L.E.: The statistical mechanics of strategic interaction. Games and Economic Behavior 5(3), 387–424 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Charikar, M., Karloff, H., Mathieu, C., Naor, J., Saks, M.: Online multicast with egalitarian cost sharing. In: Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, pp. 70–76. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chekuri, C., Chuzhoy, J., Lewin-Eytan, L., Naor, J., Orda, A.: Non-cooperative multicast and facility location games. IEEE Selected Areas in Communications 25(6), 1193–1206 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, H., Roughgarden, T.: Network design with weighted players. Theory of Computing Systems 45(2), 302–324 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, H., Roughgarden, T., Valiant, G.: Designing network protocols for good equilibria. SIAM Journal on Computing 39(5), 1799–1832 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, R., Chen, Y.: The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. American Economic Review 101(6), 2562–2589 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chien, S., Sinclair, A.: Strong and pareto price of anarchy in congestion games. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds.) ICALP 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5555, pp. 279–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Christodoulou, G., Chung, C., Ligett, K., Pyrga, E., van Stee, R.: On the price of stability for undirected network design. In: Bampis, E., Jansen, K. (eds.) WAOA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5893, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Christodoulou, G., Koutsoupias, E.: On the price of anarchy and stability of correlated equilibria of linear congestion games. In: ESA, pp. 59–70 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Epstein, A., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games. Games and Economic Behavior 67(1), 51–68 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiat, A., Kaplan, H., Levy, M., Olonetsky, S., Shabo, R.: On the price of stability for designing undirected networks with fair cost allocations. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 608–618. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Gopalakrishnan, R., Marden, J.R., Wierman, A.: Potential games are necessary to ensure pure Nash equilibria in cost sharing games. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 563–564. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hart, S., Mas-Colell, A.: Potential, value, and consistency. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 589–614 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holzman, R., Law-Yone, N.: Strong equilibrium in congestion games. Games and economic behavior 21(1), 85–101 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson, M.O.: Social and Economic Networks. Princeton (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jain, K., Mahdian, M.: Cost sharing. Algorithmic Game Theory, pp. 385–410 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kalai, E., Samet, D.: On weighted Shapley values. International Journal of Game Theory 16(3), 205–222 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Kawase, Y., Makino, K.: Nash equilibria with minimum potential in undirected broadcast games. Theoretical Computer Science (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kollias, K., Roughgarden, T.: Restoring pure equilibria to weighted congestion games. In: Aceto, L., Henzinger, M., Sgall, J. (eds.) ICALP 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6756, pp. 539–551. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, J.: An upper bound on the price of stability for undirected Shapley network design games. Information Processing Letters 109(15), 876–878 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Monderer, D., Shapley, L.S.: Potential games. Games and Economic Behavior 14(1), 124–143 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Moreno, D., Wooders, J.: Coalition-proof equilibrium. Games and Economic Behavior 17(1), 80–112 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Moulin, H.: Incremental cost sharing: Characterization by coalition strategy-proofness. Social Choice and Welfare 16(2), 279–320 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: Quantifying inefficiency in cost-sharing mechanisms. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 56(4), 23 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Rozenfeld, O., Tennenholtz, M.: Strong and correlated strong equilibria in monotone congestion games. In: Spirakis, P.G., Mavronicolas, M., Kontogiannis, S.C. (eds.) WINE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4286, pp. 74–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Shapley, L.S.: Additive and Non-Additive Set Functions. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics, Princeton University (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Slade, M.E.: What does an oligopoly maximize? Journal of Industrial Economics 42, 45–61 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Syrgkanis, V.: The complexity of equilibria in cost sharing games. In: Saberi, A. (ed.) WINE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6484, pp. 366–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Tardos, É., Wexler, T.: Network formation games and the potential function method. In: Algorithmic Game Theory, ch. 19, pp. 487–516. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. von Falkenhausen, P., Harks, T.: Optimal cost sharing for resource selection games. Mathematics of Operations Research 38(1), 184–208 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roughgarden, T., Schrijvers, O. (2014). Network Cost-Sharing without Anonymity. In: Lavi, R. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8768. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44802-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44803-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics