Skip to main content

Event Prediction in Pharyngeal High-Resolution Manometry

  • Conference paper

Abstract

A prolonged phase of increased pressure in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) after swallowing might result in globus sensation. Therefore, it is important to evaluate restitution times of the UES in order to distinguish physiologic from impaired swallow associated activities. Estimating the event \(t^{\star }\) where the UES has returned to its resting pressure after swallowing can be accomplished by predicting if swallowing activities are present or not. While the problem, whether a certain swallow is pathologic or not, is approached in Mielens (J Speech Lang Hear Res 55:892–902, 2012), the analysis conducted in this paper advances the understanding of normal pharyngoesophageal activities.

From the machine learning perspective, the problem is treated as binary sequence labeling, aiming to find a sample \(t^{\star }\) within the sequence obeying a certain characteristic: We strive for a best approximation of label transition which can be understood as a dissection of the sequence into individual parts. Whereas common models for sequence labeling are based on graphical models (Nguyen and Guo, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, New York, pp. 681–688, 2007), we approach the problem using a logistic regression as classifier, integrate sequential features by means of FFT-coefficients and a Laplacian regularizer in order to encourage a smooth classification due to the monotonicity of target labels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altun, Y., Tsochantaridis, I., & Hoffmann, T. (2003). Hidden Markov support vector machines. International Conference on Machine Learning, 3, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. (2002). Discriminative training methods for hidden markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In EMNLP (Vol. 10, pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. R., & Bredenoord, A. J. (2008). Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: Moving from research into clinical practice. Gut, 75, 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joachims, T., Finley, T., & Chun-Nam, Y. (2009). Cutting-plane training of structured SVMs. Machine Learning Journal, 72(1), 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungheim, M., Miller, S., & Ptok, M. (2013). Methodologische Aspekte zur Hochauflösungsmanometrie des Pharynx und des oberen Ösophagussphinkters. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol, 92, 158–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., & Pereira, F. (2001). Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 282–289).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S., Jungheim, M., & Ptok, M. (2012). High-resolution manometry of the upper esophageal sphincter. HNO, 60(4), 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mielens, J. D., Hoffman, M. R., Ciucci, M. R., McCulloch, T. M., & Jiang, J. J. (2012). Application of classification models to pharyngeal high-resultion manometry. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 892–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N., & Guo, Y. (2007). Comparison of sequence labeling algorithms and extensions. In Z. Ghahramani (Ed.), Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 681–688). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashar, B., Guestrin, C., & Koller, D. (2003). Max-margin Markov networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsochantaridis, I., Joachims, T., Hofmann, T., & Altun, Y. (2005). Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6, 1453–1484.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Schilling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schilling, N., Busche, A., Miller, S., Jungheim, M., Ptok, M., Schmidt-Thieme, L. (2015). Event Prediction in Pharyngeal High-Resolution Manometry. In: Lausen, B., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M. (eds) Data Science, Learning by Latent Structures, and Knowledge Discovery. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44983-7_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics