Skip to main content

Situation Theory, Situated Information, and Situated Agents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCCI,volume 8790))

Abstract

Situation Theory is mathematical modelling of concepts such as information, information units, situations, states, events, context, agents, and agent perspectives. We introduce major type-theoretical objects of Situation Theory, which model situated, partial, and parametric information. The system of situated objects is defined by mutual recursion. The main contribution to Situation Theory in this article is the distinction between situated propositions, as contents of statements and intentions, and situated factuality of the verified propositions. We use this distinction to define complex, propositional types. Another contribution is that we define complex, restricted parameters by using propositional types. The article demonstrates potential applications of the introduced complex, situation-theoretical objects. Among the many applications of Situation Theory are developments of intelligent language processing and user-computer interfaces, by integrations of human and computer languages. We focus on modelling major objects that have potentials in such applications, e.g., contexts, situated agents, and usage of names to designate objects depending on agents and information available to agents.

I am grateful to anonymous readers for valuable inspirations and suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The set-theoretical meta-theory of Situation theory, including representation of \(\mathcal {A}_{ REL }\), is not the subject of this article.

  2. 2.

    In what follows, we shall follow a practice of naming the argument role of the object that is read, by the “misspelled” notations \(\textit{read-ed}\) and \(\textit{readed}\).

  3. 3.

    Another option, “intermediate” between the above two, is to accept a relatively small set of common, abstract roles, which are similar to those used by traditional grammarians, and reintroduced in linguistics by the so-called \(\varTheta \)-theory of the Government and Binding Theory (GBT).

  4. 4.

    Note that \(\xi _{i}\) may fill more than one argument role in \(\varTheta \).

  5. 5.

    Note that \(\xi _{i}\) may fill more than one argument role in \(\rho \).

  6. 6.

    Note that \(\xi \) may fill more than one argument role in \(\varTheta (\xi )\).

  7. 7.

    Such reference expressions include many noun phrases (NPs) in human languages, e.g., names, pronounce, and definite descriptions.

  8. 8.

    In order to keep the article into its major topic, we present the denotation function \({{\mathrm{\mathsf {den}}}}\) without diverging to more theoretical technicalities, which are subjects to other ongoing and future work.

References

  1. Aczel, P.: Non-well-founded Sets. CSLI Lecture Notes, vol. 14. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barwise, J.: Scenes and other situations. J. Philos. 78, 369–397 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barwise, J., Etchemendy, J.: The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barwise, J., Moss, L.: Vicious Circles: On the Mathematics of Non-Wellfounded Phenomena. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Barwise, J., Perry, J.: Situations and Attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge (1983). republished as [6]

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barwise, J., Perry, J.: Situations and Attitudes. The Hume Series. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bjørner, D.: Domain science & engineering: a foundation for computation for humanity. In: Computation for Humanity: Information Technology to Advance Society, pp. 157–175 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Copestake, A., Flickinger, D., Pollard, C., Sag, I.: Minimal recursion semantics: an introduction. Res. Lang. Comput. 3, 281–332 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Devlin, K.: Situation theory and situation semantics. In: Gabbay, D., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 7, pp. 601–664. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ginzburg, J., Sag, I.A.: Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Loukanova, R.: Russellian and strawsonian definite descriptions in situation semantics. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2001. LNCS, vol. 2004, pp. 69–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Loukanova, R.: Generalized quantification in situation semantics. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2002. LNCS, vol. 2276, pp. 46–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Loukanova, R.: Quantification and intensionality in situation semantics. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2002. LNCS, vol. 2276, pp. 32–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Loukanova, R.: Computational syntax-semantics interface. In: Bel-Enguix, G., Jiménez-López, M.D. (eds.) Language as a Complex System: Interdisciplinary Approaches, pp. 111–150. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Loukanova, R.: From Montague’s rules of quantification to minimal recursion semantics and the language of acyclic recursion. In: Bel-Enguix, G., Dahl, V., Jiménez-López, M.D. (eds.) Biology, Computation and Linguistics – New Interdisciplinary Paradigms, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 200–214. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loukanova, R.: Semantics with the language of acyclic recursion in constraint-based grammar. In: Bel-Enguix, G., Jiménez-López, M.D. (eds.) Bio-Inspired Models for Natural and Formal Languages, pp. 103–134. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loukanova, R.: Situated propositions with constraints and restricted parameters. In: Blache, P., Christiansen, H., Dahl, V., Villadsen, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Constraints and Language Processing. Computer Science Research Reports, vol. 134, pp. 44–55, October 2011

    Google Scholar 

  18. Loukanova, R.: Syntax-semantics interface for lexical inflection with the language of acyclic recursion. In: Bel-Enguix, G., Dahl, V., Jiménez-López, M.D. (eds.) Biology, Computation and Linguistics - New Interdisciplinary Paradigms, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 228, pp. 215–236. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Loukanova, R.: Semantic information with type theory of acyclic recursion. In: Huang, R., Ghorbani, A.A., Pasi, G., Yamaguchi, T., Yen, N.Y., Jin, B. (eds.) AMT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7669, pp. 387–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Moschovakis, Y.N.: Sense and denotation as algorithm and value. In: Oikkonen, J., Vaananen, J. (eds.) Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 2, pp. 210–249. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moschovakis, Y.N.: A logical calculus of meaning and synonymy. Linguist. Philos. 29, 27–89 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pollard, C., Sag, I.A.: Information-Based Syntax and Semantics, Part I. CSLI Lecture Notes, vol. 13. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pollard, C., Sag, I.A.: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ranta, A.: Grammatical framework: a type-theoretical grammar formalism. J. Funct. Program. 14(2), 145–189 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Ranta, A.: Grammatical Framework: Programming with Multilingual Grammars. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Seligman, J., Moss, L.S.: Situation Theory. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 239–307. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thomason, R.H. (ed.): Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press, New Haven (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van Lambalgen, M., Hamm, F.: The Proper Treatment of Events. Explorations in Semantics. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roussanka Loukanova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loukanova, R. (2014). Situation Theory, Situated Information, and Situated Agents. In: Nguyen, N., Kowalczyk, R., Fred, A., Joaquim, F. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XVII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8790. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44994-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44994-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44993-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44994-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics