Abstract
As processors gain in complexity and heterogeneity, compilers are asked to perform program transformations of ever-increasing complexity to effectively map an input program to the target hardware. It is critical to develop methods and tools to automatically assert the correctness of programs generated by such modern optimizing compilers.
We present a framework to verify if two programs (one possibly being a transformed variant of the other) are semantically equivalent. We focus on scientific kernels and a state-of-the-art polyhedral compiler implemented in ROSE. We check the correctness of a set of polyhedral transformations by combining the computation of a state transition graph with a rewrite system to transform floating point computations and array update operations of one program such that we can match them as terms with those of the other program. We demonstrate our approach on a collection of benchmarks from the PolyBench/C suite.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pouchet, L.N.: PolyOpt/C 0.2.0: A Polyhedral Compiler for ROSE (2012), http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~pouchet/software/polyopt/
Bondhugula, U., Hartono, A., Ramanujam, J., Sadayappan, P.: A practical automatic polyhedral program optimization system. In: ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (June 2008)
Kong, M., Veras, R., Stock, K., Franchetti, F., Pouchet, L.N., Sadayappan, P.: When polyhedral transformations meet simd code generation. In: PLDI (June 2013)
Holewinski, J., Pouchet, L.N., Sadayappan, P.: High-performance code generation for stencil computations on gpu architectures. In: ICS (June 2012)
Pouchet, L.N., Zhang, P., Sadayappan, P., Cong, J.: Polyhedral-based data reuse optimization for configurable computing. In: FPGA (February 2013)
Pouchet, L.N.: PoCC 1.2: The Polyhedral Compiler Collection (2012), http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~pouchet/software/pocc/
Leroy, X.: The Compcert C compiler (2014), http://compcert.inria.fr/compcert-C.html
Verdoolaege, S., Janssens, G., Bruynooghe, M.: Equivalence checking of static affine programs using widening to handle recurrences. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) 34(3), 11 (2012)
Feautrier, P.: Some efficient solutions to the affine scheduling problem, part II: Multidimensional time. Intl. J. of Parallel Programming 21(6), 389–420 (1992)
Irigoin, F., Triolet, R.: Supernode partitioning. In: ACM SIGPLAN Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 319–329 (1988)
Bastoul, C.: Code generation in the polyhedral model is easier than you think. In: IEEE Intl. Conf. on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT 2004), Juan-les-Pins, France, pp. 7–16 (September 2004)
Pouchet, L.N., Bondhugula, U., Bastoul, C., Cohen, A., Ramanujam, J., Sadayappan, P., Vasilache, N.: Loop transformations: Convexity, pruning and optimization. In: POPL, pp. 549–562 (January 2011)
Girbal, S., Vasilache, N., Bastoul, C., Cohen, A., Parello, D., Sigler, M., Temam, O.: Semi-automatic composition of loop transformations. Intl. J. of Parallel Programming 34(3), 261–317 (2006)
Pouchet, L.N.: PolyBench/C 3.2 (2012), http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~pouchet/software/polybench/
Allen, J., Kennedy, K.: Optimizing Compilers for Modern Architectures. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (2002)
Cytron, R., Ferrante, J., Rosen, B.K., Wegman, M.N., Zadeck, F.K.: Efficiently computing static single assignment form and the control dependence graph. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 13(4), 451–490 (1991)
Steffen (Organizer), B.: RERS Challenge: Rigorous Examination of Reactive Systems (2010, 2012, 2013, 2014), http://www.rers-challenge.org
Quinlan, D., Liao, C., Matzke, R., Schordan, M., Panas, T., Vuduc, R., Yi, Q.: ROSE Web Page (2014), http://www.rosecompiler.org
Karfa, C., Banerjee, K., Sarkar, D., Mandal, C.: Verification of loop and arithmetic transformations of array-intensive behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 32(11), 1787–1800 (2013)
Klein, G.: A framework for formal verification of compiler optimizations. In: Kaufmann, M., Paulson, L. (eds.) ITP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6172, pp. 371–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Kalvala, S., Warburton, R., Lacey, D.: Program transformations using temporal logic side conditions. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) 31(4), 14 (2009)
Paulson, L.C.: Isabelle Page, https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/hvg/Isabelle
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schordan, M., Lin, PH., Quinlan, D., Pouchet, LN. (2014). Verification of Polyhedral Optimizations with Constant Loop Bounds in Finite State Space Computations. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Specialized Techniques and Applications. ISoLA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45231-8_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45231-8_41
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45230-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45231-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)