Skip to main content

Analyzing Learning Flows in Digital Learning Ecosystems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1187 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8390))

Abstract

This paper envisages emerging trends and methods in learning analytics for post-LMS era, where learning increasingly takes place in distributed, user-defined digital learning ecosystems. Inspired by the recent developments on uptake framework and Experience API, we propose learning flow as the main unit of analysis while studying learning-related interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Laanpere, M., Põldoja, H., Normak, P.: Designing Dippler – a next-generation TEL system. In: Ley, T., Ruohonen, M., Laanpere, M., Tatnall, A. (eds.) OST 2012. IFIP AICT, vol. 395, pp. 91–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Suthers, D.D., Rosen, D.: A unified framework for multi-level analysis of distributed learning. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Banff, Alberta, pp. 64–74. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R.: Learning in a networked world: new roles and responsibilities. In: Gibson, C. (ed.) Distance Learners in Higher Education, pp. 97–112. Atwood Publishing, Madison (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, T.: Getting the mix right again: an updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 4(2), 111–124 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 2(2–3), 87–105 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tang, T., McCalla, G.: Smart recommendation for an evolving elearning system: architecture and experiment. Int. J. E-Learn. 4(1) (2005). ISSN 1537-2456. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garrison, R.D.: Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: interaction is not enough. Am. J. Distance Educ. 19(3), 133–148 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zaiane, O.: Building a recommender agent for e-learning systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 55–59 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tang, T., McCalla, G.: Smart recommendation for an evolving elearning system: architecture and experiment. Int. J. E-Learn. 4(1), 105–129 (2005). ISSN 1537-2456

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muirhead, B.: Enhancing social interaction in computer-mediated distance education. Educ. Technol. Soc. 3(4) (2000). ISSN 1436-4522

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dawson, S., Bakharia, A., Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E.: ‘Seeing’ networks: visualising and evaluating student learning networks (2011). http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/CG9_994_Lockyer_Report_2011.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2013

  12. ExperienceAPI Specification. http://tincanapi.wikispaces.com/file/view/Experience+API+Release+v0.95.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2013

  13. Reyna, J.: Digital teaching and learning ecosystem (DTLE): a theoretical approach for online learning environments. In: Williams, G., Statham, P., Brown, N., Cleland, B. (eds.) Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings of Ascilite 2011, pp. 1083–1088. University of Tasmania, Hobart (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Odling-Smee, F.J., Laland, K.N., Feldman, M.W.: Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Young, M.F.: An ecological psychology of instructional design: learning and thinking by perceiving-acting systems. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, E.D.: In support of a functional definition of interaction. Am. J. Distance Educ. 8(2), 6–26 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson, T.: Modes of interaction in distance education: recent developments and research questions. In: Moore, M. (ed.) Handbook of Distance Education, pp. 129–144. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, M.G.: Three types of interaction. Am. J. Distance Educ. 3(2), 1–6 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laanpere, M., Pata, K., Normak, P., Põldoja, H.: Pedagogy-driven design of digital learning ecosystems: the case study of dippler. In: Klamma, R., Specht, M., Leung, H. (eds.) Advances in Web-Based Learning, pp. 307–317. Springer LNCS, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Graf, S., Ives, C., Rahman, N., Ferri, A.: AAT: a tool for accessing and analysing students’ behaviour data in learning systems. In: LAK 2011 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 174–179 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Liddo, A.; Buckingham Shum, S.; Quinto, I.; Bachler, M., Cannavacciuolo, L.: Discourse-centric learning analytics. In: LAK 2011: 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Banff, Alberta. ACM Press: New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leony, D., Pardo, A, Valentín L., Castro, D.S., Kloos, C. D.: GLASS: a learning analytics visualization tool. In: Buckingham Shum, S., Gasevic, D., Ferguson, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 162–163. ACM Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ferguson, R., Buckingham Shum, S.: Social learning analytics: five approaches. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 29 April–May, Vancouver, BC. ACM Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lehman, B., Cade, W., Olney, A.: Off topic conversation in expert tutoring: waste of time or learning opportunity. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 11–13 June 2010, Pittsburgh PA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krüger, A., Merceron, A., Wolf, B.: A data model to ease analysis and mining of educational data. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 11–13 June 2010, Pittsburgh PA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partly funded by the targeted research grant No. 0130159s08 issued by the Ministry of Education and Research of the Republic of Estonia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mart Laanpere .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eradze, M., Pata, K., Laanpere, M. (2015). Analyzing Learning Flows in Digital Learning Ecosystems. In: Chiu, D., et al. Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2013 Workshops. ICWL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8390. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46315-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46315-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46314-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46315-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics