Abstract
It has been observed that conventionally implicated content interacts with at-issue content in a number of different ways. This paper focuses on the existence of anaphoric links between content of these two types, something disallowed by the system of Potts (2005), the original locus of work on these issues. The problem of characterizing this interaction has been considered by a number of authors. This paper proposes a new system for understanding it in the framework of Dependent Type Semantics. It is shown that the resulting system provides a good characterization of how “cross-dimensional” anaphoric links can be supported from a proof-theoretic perspective.
Our sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers of LENLS11 who gave us insightful comments. Elin McCready and Daisuke Bekki are partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 25370441) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture. Daisuke Bekki is partially supported by JST, CREST.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We should specify some features of S both on the predicate side and the rule side, in order to prevent this rule to apply to other kinds of phrases of category \(S\backslash NP \), such as verb phrases, which is a routine task we will not perform here.
- 2.
There is a possible problem with attributing the property (1c) to CIs. Gutzmann [9, 10] argues that sentences such as (1) is a possible counter-example for (1c) in the sense that fucking in (1) serves to intensify the degree to which Jerry has the property of being an asshole, which is CI content that is induced by asshole; thus, the adjective works to strengthen not-at-issue content in cases of this kind.
The current version of DTS, however, predicts that the target of the modification performed by fucking does not include the CI content of asshole, just as in the case of (20). We believe this issue relates to the sort of variance in what counts as “at-issue” discussed by Hom [12, 13], and, as such, exhibits a level of complexity that requires a more detailed look at the pragmatics of these constructions (cf. Amaral et al. [1]). This difficult project is beyond the scope of the present paper.
References
Amaral, P., Roberts, C., Smith, E.: Review of ‘the logic of conventional implicatures’ by Christopher Potts. Linguist. Philos. 30, 707–749 (2008)
Asher, N., Pogodalla, S.: SDRT and continuation semantics. In: Onoda, T., Bekki, D., McCready, E. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6797, pp. 3–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Barker, C., Bernardi, R., Shan, C.: Principles of interdemensional meaning interaction. In: Li, N., Lutz, D. (eds.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20, pp. 109–127. eLanguage (2011)
Barker, C., Shan, C.C.: Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding. Semantics and Pragmatics 1(1), 1–46 (2008)
Bekki, D.: Representing anaphora with dependent types. In: Asher, N., Soloviev, S. (eds.) LACL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8535, pp. 14–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Coquand, T., Huet, G.: The calculus of constructions. Inf. Comput. 76(2–3), 95–120 (1988)
Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, London (1975)
de Groote, P.: Towards a montagovian account of dynamics. In: Gibson, M., Howell, J. (eds.) 16th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT16), pp. 148–155. CLC Publications, University of Tokyo (2006)
Gutzmann, D.: Expressive modifiers & mixed expressives. In: Bonami, O., Cabredo Hofherr, P. (eds.) Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, pp. 143–165 (2011)
Gutzmann, D.: Use-Conditional Meaning: studies in multidimensional semantics. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Frankfurt (2012)
Heim, I., Kratzer, A.: Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford (1998). No. 13 in Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics
Hom, C.: The semantics of racial epithets. J. Philos. 105, 416–440 (2008)
Hom, C.: A puzzle about pejoratives. Philos. Stud. 159(3), 383–405 (2010)
Krahmer, E., Piwek, P.: Presupposition projection as proof construction. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R. (eds.) Computing Meanings: Current Issues in Computational Semantics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999). Studies in Linguistics Philosophy Series
Löh, A., McBride, C., Swierstra, W.: A tutorial implementation of a dependently typed lambda calculus. Fundamenta Informaticae - Dependently Typed Program. 102(2), 177–207 (2010)
Martin-Löf, P.: Intuitionistic type theory. In: sambin, G. (ed.) vol. 17. Bibliopolis, Naples (1984)
Montague, R.: The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary english. In: Hintikka, J., Moravcsic, J., Suppes, P. (eds.) Approaches to Natural Language, pp. 221–242. Reidel, Dordrecht (1973)
Nouwen, R.: On appositives and dynamic binding. Res. Lang. Comput. 5, 87–102 (2007)
Potts, C.: The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)
Ranta, A.: Type-Theoretical Grammar. Oxford University Press, New York (1994)
Roberts, C.: Information structure: towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In: OSUWPL, Papers in Semantics, vol. 49. The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics (1996)
van der Sandt, R.: Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. J. Seman. 9, 333–377 (1992)
Simons, M., Tonhauser, J., Beaver, D., Roberts, C.: What projects and why. In: Proceedings of SALT 20, pp. 309–327. CLC Publications (2011)
Sundholm, G.: Proof theory and meaning. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. III, pp. 471–506. Kluwer, Reidel, Dordrecht (1986)
Wang, L., Reese, B., McCready, E.: The projection problem of nominal appositives. Snippets 11, 13–14 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bekki, D., McCready, E. (2015). CI via DTS. In: Murata, T., Mineshima, K., Bekki, D. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9067. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48118-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48119-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)