Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Note on Reliability-Based Preference Dynamics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9394))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper continues a line of work that studies individual preference upgrades in order to model situations akin to a process of public deliberation in collective decision making. It proposes a general upgrade policy, presenting its semantic definition and a corresponding modality for describing its effects as well as a complete axiom system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dietrich, F., List, C.: Where do preferences come from? International Journal of Game Theory 42(3), 613–637 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dryzek, J.S., List, C.: Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science 33, 1–28 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghosh, S., Velázquez-Quesada, F.R.: Agreeing to agree: Reaching unanimity via preference dynamics based on reliable agents. In: Bordini, R., Elkind, E., Weiss, G., Yolum, P. (eds.) AAMAS 2015, pp. 1491–1499 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burgess, J.P.: Basic tense logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. II, pp. 89–133. Reidel (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldblatt, R.: Logics of Time and Computation, 2nd edn. CSLI Lecture Notes, no. 7. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gargov, G., Passy, S.: A note on boolean modal logic. In: Petkov, P.P. (ed.) Mathematical Logic, pp. 299–309. Springer US (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harel, D., Kozen, D., Tiuryn, J.: Dynamic Logic. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Rott, H.: Shifting priorities: Simple representations for 27 iterated theory change operators. In: Lagerlund, H., Lindström, S., Sliwinski, R. (eds.) Modality Matters: Twenty-Five Essays in Honour of Krister Segerberg. Uppsala Philosophical Studies, no. 53, pp. 359–384. University of Uppsala, Upsala (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Benthem, J.: Dynamic logic for belief revision. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17(2), 129–155 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese Library, no. 337. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Benthem, J.: Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction. Cambridge University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Benthem, J., Liu, F.: Dynamic logic of preference upgrade. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17(2), 157–182 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Grüne-Yanoff, T., Hansson, S.O.: Preference Change. Theory and Decision Library, vol. 42. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Eijck, J., Wang, Y.: Propositional dynamic logic as a logic of belief revision. In: Hodges, W., de Queiroz, R. (eds.) WoLLIC 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5110, pp. 136–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2008), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69937-8_13

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baltag, A., Smets, S.: A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision. In: Bonanno, G., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT 7). Texts in Logic and Games, vol. 3, pp. 13–60. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ghosh, S., de Jongh, D.: Comparing strengths of beliefs explicitly. Logic Journal of the IGPL 21(3), 488–514 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Y., Cao, Q.: On axiomatizations of public announcement logic. Synthese 190(18), 103–134 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. van Benthem, J., van Eijck, J., Kooi, B.: Logics of communication and change. Information and Computation 204(11), 1620–1662 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements and common knowledge and private suspicions. In: Gilboa, I. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK 1998), Evanston, IL, USA, July 22-24, pp. 43–56. Morgan Kaufmann (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Statistical Institute, Chennai, India

    Sujata Ghosh

  2. Grupo de Lógica, Lenguaje e Información, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain

    Fernando R. Velázquez-Quesada

Authors
  1. Sujata Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando R. Velázquez-Quesada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujata Ghosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Comp Sci, Univ of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

    Wiebe van der Hoek

  2. Department of Philosophy, Group in Logic & the Methodology of Sci. University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

    Wesley H. Holliday

  3. Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Wen-fang Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ghosh, S., Velázquez-Quesada, F.R. (2015). A Note on Reliability-Based Preference Dynamics. In: van der Hoek, W., Holliday, W., Wang, Wf. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48560-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48561-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation