Skip to main content

On the Expressivity of First-Order Modal Logic with “Actually”

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9394))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many authors have noted that a number of English modal sentences cannot be formalized into standard first-order modal logic. Some widely discussed examples include “There could have been things other than there actually are” and “Everyone who’s actually rich could have been poor.” In response, many authors have introduced an “actually” operator @ into the language of first-order modal logic. It is occasionally noted that some of the example sentences still cannot be formalized with @ if one allows only actualist quantifiers, and embedded versions of these example sentences cannot be formalized even with possibilist quantifiers and @. The typical justification for these claims is to observe that none of the most plausible candidate formalizations succeed. In this paper, we prove these inexpressibility results by using a modular notion of bisimulation for first-order modal logic with “actually” and other operators. In doing so, we will explain in what ways these results do or do not generalize to more expressive modal languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Benthem, J.F.A.K.: Tense Logic and Standard Logic. Logique et Analyse 80, 395–437 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. van Benthem, J.F.A.K.: Frame Correspondences in Modal Predicate Logic. In: Proofs, Categories and Computations: Essays in Honor of Grigori Mints, pp. 1–14. College Publications, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bricker, P.: Quantified Modal Logic and the Plural De Re. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 372–394 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cresswell, M.J.: Entities and Indicies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Crossley, J.N., Humberstone, I.L.: The Logic of “Actually”. Reports on Mathematical Logic 8, 11–29 (1977)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Davies, M., Humberstone, L.: Two Notions of Necessity. Philosophical Studies 38, 1–30 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fara, M., Williamson, T.: Counterparts and actuality. Mind 114, 1–30 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fine, K.: Model theory for modal logic - Part III Existence and predication. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 293–307 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Garson, J.W.: Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 3, pp. 267–323. Springer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hazen, A.P.: Expressive Completeness in Modal Language. Journal of Philosophical Logic 5(1), 25–46 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hazen, A.P.: Actuality and Quantification. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31(4), 498–508 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hodes, H.T.: Some Theorems on the Expressive Limitations of Modal Languages. Journal of Philosophical Logic 13(1), 13–26 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hodes, H.T.: Axioms of Actuality. Journal of Philosophical Logic 13(1), 27–34 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kocurek, A.W.: The Problem of Cross-world Predication (2015) (Manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis, D.K.: Counterfactuals and Comparative Possibility. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 418–446 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sider, T.: Logic for Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sturm, H., Wolter, F.: First-Order Expressivity for S5-Models: Modal vs. Two-Sorted Languages. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 571–591 (July 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wehmeier, K.F.: World Travelling and Mood Swings. In: Löwe, B., Malzkorn, W., Räsch, T. (eds.) Foundations of the Formal Sciences II (pp, pp. 257–260 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yanovich, I.: Expressive Power of “Now” and “Then” Operators. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 24, 65–93 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander W. Kocurek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kocurek, A.W. (2015). On the Expressivity of First-Order Modal Logic with “Actually”. In: van der Hoek, W., Holliday, W., Wang, Wf. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48560-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48561-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics