Skip to main content

Fuzzy Description Logics for Component Selection in Software Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9509))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the Future Internet era, the way software will be produced and used will more and more depend on the new challenges deriving from the virtually infinite number of software services that can be composed to build new applications. The integration and composition of existing software, components and services is now gaining a crucial role in the software modeling and production and encompasses several aspects ranging from theoretical issues like modeling and analysis, to practical and implementation ones like run-time management and integration. In the wide set of issues concerning software composition, in this position paper we propose a formalization via a Fuzzy Description Logic for modeling architectural aspects of a software system.

The formalism models architectural patterns and non-functional requirements about quality attributes where both the relationships among patterns and the set non-functional requirements are modelled together with their mutual interactions. The declarative approach proposed here would make possible to formally represent and maintain the above mentioned knowledge by keeping the flexibility and fuzziness of modeling thanks to the use of fuzzy concepts as high, low, fair, etc. We also identify the need for a reasoning task able to exploit the fuzzy nature of the adopted logic to retrieve a ranked list of set of patterns covering given user requirements represented in terms of NFRs and families of patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this case we do not have a high maintainability as the system adapts its configuration to context (or requirements) variations. At the same time the maintainability is not low as it has its own internal logic.

References

  1. Ameller, D., Franch, X., Cabot, J.: Dealing with non-functional requirements in model-driven development. In: 2010 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 189–198. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baresi, L., Caporuscio, M., Ghezzi, C., Guinea, S.: Model-driven management of services. In: 2010 IEEE 8th European Conference on Web Services (ECOWS), pp. 147–154. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botella, P., Burgues, X., Franch, X., Huerta, M., Salazar, G.: Modeling non-functional requirements. In: Proceedings of Jornadas de Ingenieria de Requisitos Aplicada JIRA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buschmann, F., Henney, K., Schmidt, D.C.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A Pattern Language for Distributed Computing, vol. 4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buschmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P., Stal, M.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caporuscio, M., Mirandola, R., Trubiani, C.: Qos-based feedback for service compositions. In: Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures, pp. 37–42. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chung, L., do Prado Leite, J.C.S.: On non-functional requirements in software engineering. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 363–379. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Egyed, A., Grunbacher, P.: Identifying requirements conflicts and cooperation: how quality attributes and automated traceability can help. IEEE Softw. 21(6), 50–58 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Franch, X.: Systematic formulation of non-functional characteristics of software. In: 1998 Third International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 174–181. IEEE (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Pearson Education, Massachusetts (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glinz, M.: On non-functional requirements. In: 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2007, pp. 21–26. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harrison, N.B., Avgeriou, P.: How do architecture patterns and tactics interact? a model and annotation. J. Syst. Softw. 83(10), 1735–1758 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Issarny, V., Georgantas, N., Hachem, S., Zarras, A., Vassiliadist, P., Autili, M., Gerosa, M.A., Hamida, A.B.: Service-oriented middleware for the future internet: state of the art and research directions. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 2(1), 23–45 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jansen, A., Bosch, J.: Software architecture as a set of architectural design decisions. In: 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA 2005, pp. 109–120. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, K., Calinescu, R.: Efficient re-resolution of smt specifications for evolving software architectures. In: Proceedings of the 10th International ACM Sigsoft Conference on Quality of Software Architectures, pp. 93–102. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, F.-L., Horkoff, J., Mylopoulos, J., Liu, L., Borgida, A.: Non-functional requirements revisited. In: iStar, pp. 109–114. Citeseer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maiden, N., Lockerbie, J., Zachos, K., Bertolino, A., De Angelis, G., Lonetti, F.: A requirements-led approach for specifying qos-aware service choreographies: an experience report. In: Weerd, I., Salinesi, C. (eds.) REFSQ 2014. LNCS, vol. 8396, pp. 239–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mairiza, D., Zowghi, D., Nurmuliani, N.: Managing conflicts among non-functional requirements (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mikkonen, T.: Formalizing design patterns. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 115–124. IEEE Computer Society (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Nixon, B.: Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: a process-oriented approach. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 18(6), 483–497 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Straccia, U.: Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 14, 137–166 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Straccia, U.: A fuzzy description logic for the semantic web. In: Sanchez, E., (ed.) Capturing Intelligence: Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web, Chapter 4, pp. 73–90. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Straccia, U.: Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Semantic Web Languages. CRC Studies in Informatics Series. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taibi, T., Ngo, D.C.L.: Formal specification of design patterns - a balanced approach. J. Object Tech. 2(4), 127–140 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tichy, W.F.: A catalogue of general-purpose software design patterns. In: Proceedings on Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, TOOLS 23, pp. 330–339. IEEE (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tofan, D., Galster, M., Avgeriou, P., Schuitema, W.: Past and future of software architectural decisions-a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Tech. 56(8), 850–872 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu, L., Ziv, H., Richardson, D., Liu, Z.: Towards modeling non-functional requirements in software architecture. In: Early Aspects (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Mongiello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Noia, T., Mongiello, M., Straccia, U. (2015). Fuzzy Description Logics for Component Selection in Software Design. In: Bianculli, D., Calinescu, R., Rumpe, B. (eds) Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9509. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49224-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49224-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49223-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49224-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics