Skip to main content

Comparison of Post-Hoc Normalization Approaches for CT-based Lung Emphysema Index Quantification

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Abstract

CT-based lung emphysema quantification is sensitive to the kernel used for image reconstruction. In this paper, we present and evaluate three methods for normalization of CT images reconstructed with different kernels to homogenize image sharpness and pixel noise. For 56 subjects, chest CT images reconstructed with a soft kernel (B20f) and a medium sharp kernel (B50f) were acquired. Normalization of the B50f images was performed using a Laplacian frequency decomposition, an edge-preserving frequency decomposition, and a heuristic filter-based method. To compare the normalization methods, emphysema indices (EIs) were computed from the normalized images and compared to the baseline EIs computed from the B20f images. Further, volume overlaps of the detected emphysema regions were computed. Average differences in EI between kernels decreased for all normalization methods. Laplacian and edge-preserving frequency normalization show a similar agreement with the baseline EI, however, emphysema regions detected after Laplacian frequency normalization show degraded volume overlaps likely caused by haloing artifacts in the normalized images. Overall, edge-preserving frequency decomposition shows the best normalization performance yet high computational demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Siafakas N, Vermeire P, Pride Na, et al. Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Eur Respir J. 1995;8(8):1398–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ley-Zaporozhan J, Ley S, Kauczor HU., Morphological and functional imaging in COPD with CT and MRI: present and future. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:510–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Madani A, Zanen J, De Maertelaer V, et al. Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multi–detector row CT? comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry 1. Radiology. 2006;238(3):1036–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartel ST, Bierhals AJ, Pilgram TK, et al. Equating quantitative emphysema measurements on different CT reconstructions. Med Phys. 2011;38(8):4894–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaller S, Wildberger JE, Raupach R, et al. Spatial domain filtering for fast modification of the tradeoff between image sharpness and pixel noise in computed tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2003;22(7):846–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohkubo M, Wada S, Kayugawa A, et al. Image filtering as an alternative to the application of a different reconstruction kernel in CT imaging: feasibility study in lung cancer screening. Med Phys. 2011;38(7):3915–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallardo-Estrella L, Lynch DA, Prokop M, et al. Normalizing computed tomography data reconstructed with different filter kernels: effect on emphysema quantification. Eur Radiol. 2015; p. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weickert J. Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing. Teubner Stuttgart; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ehrhardt, J., Jacob, F., Handels, H., Frydrychowicz, A. (2016). Comparison of Post-Hoc Normalization Approaches for CT-based Lung Emphysema Index Quantification. In: Tolxdorff, T., Deserno, T., Handels, H., Meinzer, HP. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2016. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49465-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics