Skip to main content

Basic Statistics of SIFT Features for Texture Analysis

  • Conference paper
Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2016

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of two methods using Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) for texture analysis, in order to classify malaria parasites versus leukocytes in thick blood smears. In the first approach, the texture is represented by basic statistics of SIFT features like the mean value and standard deviation. The second technique is a vector-quantization approach called bag of visual words, which uses k-means clustering for creating one feature vector per image. Here, the number of clusters is the crucial variable, which is analyzed in this contribution. Furthermore, we compare two different ways to choose the SIFT keypoints. The default SIFT keypoint detector is performed, or a dense grid of equally distributed points in the image determines the location of the keypoints. The results show that grid keypoints yield the best performance and classification in general is possible with both methods using SIFT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lowe DG. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis. 2004;60(2):91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang J, Jiang YG, Hauptmann AG, et al.; ACM. Evaluating bag-of-visual-words representations in scene classification. Proc Int Workshop Multimedia Inf Retr. 2007; p. 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sivic J, Zisserman A; IEEE. Video Google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. Proc IEEE Ninth Int Conf Comput Vis. 2003; p. 1470–77.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Gemert JC, Veenman CJ, Smeulders AW, et al. Visual word ambiguity. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2010;32(7):1271–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ensafi S, Lu S, Kassim AA, et al.; IEEE. Automatic cad system for hep-2 cell image classification. Proc IEEE 22nd Int Conf Pattern Recognit(ICPR). 2014; p. 3321–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lazebnik S, Schmid C, Ponce J;IEEE. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2006;2:2169–78.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Y, Jin R, Zhou ZH. Understanding bag-of-words model: a statistical framework. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2010;1(1–4):43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2011;2:27:1–27:27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saeys Y, Inza I, Larra˜naga P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(19):2507–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Erpenbeck, D. et al. (2016). Basic Statistics of SIFT Features for Texture Analysis. In: Tolxdorff, T., Deserno, T., Handels, H., Meinzer, HP. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2016. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49465-3_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics