Abstract
Breast density differs from almost entirely fatty to extremely dense tissue composition. In mammography screenings, physicians are often supported by computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems (CAD) whose detection rate is affected by the density of the breast. An automatic pre-assessment of breast density would enable a specific analysis adapted to each density class. Digital mammograms from the INbreast database [1] are decomposed into Haar-Wavelet components and several levels are used for classification. A random forest classifier is applied on the averaged Wavelet components for four class densities which yields an accuracy of 64.53% in CC-view and 51.22% in MLO-view. The 3-class problem with a combined class of medium densities yields an accuracy of 73.89% in CC-view and 67.80% in MLO-view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Moreira IC, Amaral I, Domingues I, et al. INbreast: toward a dull-field digital mammographic database. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(2):236–48.
Tang J, Rangayyan RM, Xu J, et al. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009;13(2):236–51.
Ho WT, Lam PWT. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol. 2003;58(2):133–6.
Malich A, Fischer DR, Facius M, et al. Effect of breast density on computer aided detection. J Digit Imaging. 2005;18(3):227–33.
Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density: measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(3).
Heine JJ, Carston MJ, Scott CG, et al. An automated approach for estimation of breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(11):3090–7.
D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BI-RADSR Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Am Coll Radiol; 2013.
Haar A. On the theory of orthogonal function systems. Fundam Pap Wavelet Theory. 2006; p. 155–88.
Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32.
Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, et al. The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. 2009;11(1):10–8.
Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DSM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection. JAMA Int Med. 2015; p. 1–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schebesch, F., Unberath, M., Andersen, I., Maier, A. (2016). Breast Density Assessment Using Wavelet Features on Mammograms. In: Tolxdorff, T., Deserno, T., Handels, H., Meinzer, HP. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2016. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49465-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49465-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49464-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49465-3
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)