Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Industrie 4.0 aus Perspektive der nachhaltigen industriellen Wertschöpfung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digitalisierung im Spannungsfeld von Politik, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Recht

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag untersucht die Nutzenpotenziale und Herausforderungen für Industrieunternehmen hinsichtlich Industrie 4.0 aus ökonomischer, ökologischer und sozialer Perspektive der Nachhaltigkeit. Die Grundlage bilden Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie, in der Vertreter 46 deutscher Industrieunternehmen aus den drei Branchen Maschinen- und Anlagenbau, Elektrotechnik und Automobilindustrie mittels Experteninterviews befragt wurden. Als Ergebnis werden unterschiedliche Nutzenpotenziale und Herausforderungen im Kontext der Nachhaltigkeit dargelegt, die um die Kategorien Daten und Informationen, technische Integration sowie Handlungsbedarf des Staates als übergeordnete, sich auf mehrere Dimensionen der Nachhaltigkeit auswirkende Kategorien, ergänzt werden. Abschließend zeigt der Beitrag übergeordnete Handlungsempfehlungen für Industrieunternehmen bei der Umsetzung einer nachhaltigen Wertschöpfung durch Industrie 4.0 auf.

Prof. Dr. Kai-Ingo Voigt ist Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Industrielles Management an der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Dr. Daniel Kiel, Julian M. Müller und Dr. Christian Arnold sind Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiter des Lehrstuhls für Industrielles Management an der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility. A review and research agenda. J Manage 38(4):932–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Najjar B, Anfimiadou A (2012) Environmental policies and firm value. Bus Strateg Environ 21(1):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambec S, Lanoie P (2008) Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manage Perspect 22(4):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold C, Kiel D, Voigt KI (2016) How the industrial Internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. Int J Innov Manag 20(8):1640015-1–1640015-25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer W, Schlund S, Marrenbach D, Ganschar O (2014) Industrie 4.0 – Volkswirtschaftliches Potenzial für Deutschland. BITKOM/Fraunhofer IAO, Berlin/Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann M, Hielscher S, Pies I (2014) Commitment strategies for sustainability: how business firms can transform trade-offs into win-win outcomes. Bus Strateg Environ 23(1):18–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomgren A (2011) Does corporate social responsibility influence profit margins? A case study of executive perceptions. Corp Soc Resp Env Manage 18(5):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonekamp L, Sure M (2015) Consequences of industry 4.0 on human labour and work organisation. J Bus Media Psychol 6(1):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2014) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Eng 8(1):37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 11(2):130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manage J 50(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation. Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manage Rev 36(2):90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1998) Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ Qual Manag 8(1):37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton RR, Wempe WF (2009) Lean manufacturing, non-financial performance measures, and financial performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage 29(3):214–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel M, Pessel E (2016) Industry 4.0 and sustainability impacts: critical discussion of sustainability aspects with a special focus on future of work and ecological consequences. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara Int J Eng 1(16):131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ Res Meth 16(1):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavas A, Mish J (2015) Resources and capabilities of triple bottom line firms: going over old or breaking new ground? J Bus Ethics 127(3):623–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavič P, Lukman R (2007) Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. J Clean Prod 15(18):1875–1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann C, Schmidt C, Kurle D, Blume S, Thiede S (2014) Sustainability in manufacturing and factories of the future. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 1(4):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti OR (1968) Content analysis. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (Hrsg) The handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard G (2009) Measuring organizational performance. Beyond the triple bottom line. Bus Strateg Environ 18(3):177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jick T (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24(4):602–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0 – final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Communication Promoters Group of the Industry-Science Research Alliance, acatech, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiel D, Arnold C, Collisi M, Voigt K-I (2016) The impact of the industrial Internet of things on established business models. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT) conference, Orlando, S 673–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis. Sage, Los Angeles

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper H-G, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(4):239–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3(1):18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen M (2004) The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecol Econ 49(2):199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao Y, Deschamps F, de Loures E, Ramos LFP (2017) Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 – a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int J Prod Res 55(12):3609–3629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littig B, Griessler E (2005) Social sustainability. A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int J Sustain Dev 8(1/2):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markley MJ, Davis L (2007) Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 37(9):763–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason J (2002) Qualitative researching. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A, Parhankangas A, Coupet J, Welch E, Barnum DT (2016) Strategic decision making for the triple bottom line. Bus Strateg Environ 25(3):193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman MA (1994) Qualitative data analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne MJ, Gray R (2013) W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. J Bus Ethics 118(1):13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman W, MacDonald C, Arnold DG (2004) Getting to the bottom of „triple bottom line“. Bus Ethics Q 14(2):243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne LK, Phipps M, Weaver T, Carrington M, Luchs M, Catlin J (2016) Managing the tensions at the intersection of the triple bottom line: a paradox theory approach to sustainability management. J Public Policy Mark 35(2):249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloza J (2009) The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. J Manage 35(6):1518–1541

    Google Scholar 

  • Peukert B, Benecke S, Clavell J, Neugebauer S, Nissen NF, Uhlmann E (2015) Addressing sustainability and flexibility in manufacturing via smart modular machine tool frames to support sustainable value creation. Procedia CIRP 29:514–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J (2010) Building sustainable organizations. The human factor. Acad Manage Perspect 24(1):34–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlechtendahl J, Keinert M, Kretschmer F, Lechler A, Verl A (2015) Making existing production systems Industry 4.0-ready. Prod Eng 9(1):143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz SA, Flanigan RL (2016) Developing competitive advantage using the triple bottom line: a conceptual framework. J Bus Ind Mark 31(4):449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seow C, Jamali D (2006) Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective. Bus Process Manage J 12(6):809–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock T, Seliger G (2016) Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40:536–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M (2010) The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance. A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecol Econ 69(7):1553–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan J (2011) Advances in cyber-physical systems research. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst 5(11):1891–1908

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston C, Gandell T, Beauchamp J, McAlpine L, Wiseman C, Beauchamp C (2001) Analyzing interview data: the development and evolution of a coding system. Qual Sociol 24(3):381–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Deutschland

    Kai-Ingo Voigt, Daniel Kiel, Julian Marius Müller & Christian Arnold

Authors
  1. Kai-Ingo Voigt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Kiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julian Marius Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Arnold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai-Ingo Voigt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DATEV eG, Nürnberg, Germany

    Christian Bär

  2. honert + partner mbB, München, Germany

    Thomas Grädler

  3. DATEV eG, Nürnberg, Germany

    Robert Mayr

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Voigt, KI., Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Arnold, C. (2018). Industrie 4.0 aus Perspektive der nachhaltigen industriellen Wertschöpfung. In: Bär, C., Grädler, T., Mayr, R. (eds) Digitalisierung im Spannungsfeld von Politik, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Recht. Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56438-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56438-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56437-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56438-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation