Skip to main content

An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Twitter Sentiment and Influence in the Tourism Domain

  • Conference paper
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2012

Abstract

Social media have a strong impact on the way users interact and share information. Several previous studies have highlighted how the structure of a social network can affect the dynamics of user interaction and information sharing. The majority of these studies have focused on the role of influencers, i.e. nodes with a central position in the network. Our claim is that while the information shared by influencers has a broader reach, the content of messages plays a critical role and can be a determinant of the social influence of the message irrespective of the centrality of the message’s author. In this paper, we put forward four hypotheses supporting this claim by focusing on the sentiment of posts to characterize content and test them on a data set of 500,000 messages from Twitter in the tourism domain. Overall, our hypotheses posit that negative posts are more influential than positive ones. Results show how negative tweets are retweeted more than positive tweets. However, the time dynamics of retweeting seem independent of the sentiment of tweets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anholt, S. (2009). Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. Palgrave Macmillan, Eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aus, S., Galuba, W., Huberman, B.A. & Romero, D.M. (2010). Influence and passivity in social media. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A. & Watts, D. J. (2011). Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (WSDM’ 11). New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 65–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barbagallo, D., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C. & Matera, M. (2011). Semantic sentiment analyses based on the reputation of Web information sources. In V. Sugumaran and J. A. Gulla (Eds), Applied Semantic Web Technologies. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barres, J. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human relations 7: 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T. & Davenport, J. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Cambridge: Harvard Business School press..

    Google Scholar 

  • Benevenuto, F., Cha, M., Gummadi K.P. & Haddadi, H. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Proceedings of the 4 th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Association for the advancement of artificial intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. & Milkman, K. (2010) Social transmission, emotion, and the virality of online content. Wharton Research Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., Golder, S. & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet Tweet Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. In Proceedings of HICSS-42, Persistent Conversation Track. Kauai, HI: IEEE Computer Society. January 5-8, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brin, S. & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. In Proceedings of the 7 th International World Wide Web Conference. 30 (1–7), pp. 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodka, P., Kazienko, P. & Musial, K. (2009). User position measure in social networks. In Proceedings of the 3 rd Workshop On Social Network Mining and Analysis. Paris, France: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. (1959). Studies in social power. Vol. 6. University of Michigan, USA: Research Center for Group Dynamics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D., Harary, F. & Norman, R. (1965). Structural models: An introduction to the theory of directed graphs. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Nairn, R., Nelson, L., Bernstein, M. & Chi, E. (2010). Short and tweet: experiments on recommending content from information streams. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI’ 10). New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 1185–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K.K., Davies, J. & Hossain, L. (2005). Exploring sociocentric and egocentric approaches for social network analysis. In Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge Management. Pp. 1–8, Wellington, New Zealand, Asia Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3): 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. & Ruge, M. (1965) The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the congo, cuba and cyprus crises in four norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research 2(1): 64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz E. & Lazarsfeld P. F. (1955). Personal influence; the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H. & Moon, S. (2010). Finding influentials based on the temporal order of information adoption in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 19th international World Wide Web conference. Raleigh, North Carolina, USA: ACM, pp. 1137–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H. & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (WWW’ 10). New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 591–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, A. (2009). The influential: New approaches for analyzing influence on Twitter. Boston, USA: Web Ecology Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, M., Poblete, B. & Castillo, C. (2010). Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT?. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics (SOMA’ 10). New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 71–79.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today 1(1): 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Y., Huang, C., Zhang, P. & Zhang., J. (2011). Microblogging after a major disaster in China: a case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW’ 11). New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, 4th edition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharl, A., Dickinger, A. & Weichselbraun, A. (2008). Analyzing News Media Coverage to Acquire and Structure Tourism Knowledge. Information Technology & Tourism 10(1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, K., Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M. & Chowdury, A. (2009) Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(11): 2169–2188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbird, K. (2010). Pass It On?: Retweeting in Mass Emergency. In Proceedings of the 7th International ISCRAM Conference — Seattle, USA, May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Bandari, R., Kong, J., Qian, H. & Roychowdhury, V. (2010). Information resonance on Twitter: watching Iran. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics (SOMA’ 10). New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barbagallo, D., Bruni, L., Francalanci, C., Giacomazzi, P. (2012). An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Twitter Sentiment and Influence in the Tourism Domain. In: Fuchs, M., Ricci, F., Cantoni, L. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2012. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1142-0_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1142-0_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1141-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1142-0

Publish with us

Policies and ethics