Skip to main content

Artistic Composition for Image Creation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Eurographics ((EUROGRAPH))

Abstract

Altering the viewing parameters of a 3D object results in computer graphics images of varying quality. One aspect of image quality is the composition of the image. While the esthetic properties of an image are subjective, some heuristics used by artists to create images can be approximated quantitatively. We present an algorithm based on heuristic compositional rules for finding the format, viewpoint, and layout for an image of a 3D object. Our system computes viewing parameters automatically or allows a user to explicitly manipulate them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apodaca, A. A., and Gritz, L. Advanced Renderman Creating CGI for Motion Pictures. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnheim, R. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. University of California Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnheim, R. The Power of the Center. University of California Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barbour, C. G., and Meyer, G. W. Visual cues and pictorial limitations in photorealistic images. The Visual Computer 9, 4 (1992), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bethers, R. Composition in Pictures. Pitman Publishing Corporation, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blanz, V., Tarr, M. J., and Bulthoff, H. H. What object attributes determine canonical views. Perception 28, 5 (1999), 575–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clifton, J. The Eye of the Artist. North Light Publishers., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edelman, S., and Bulthoff, H. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research 32, 12 (1992), 2385–2400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feiner, S. Apex: an experiment in the automated creation of pictorial explanations. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 5, 11 (November 1985),29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karp, P., and Feiner, S. Issues in the automated generation of animated presentations. In Graphics Interface (1990), pp. 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kawai, J. K., Painter, J. S., and Cohen, M. F. Radioptimization — goal based rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (1993), pp. 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kowalski, M. A., Hughes, J. F., Rubin, C. B., and Ohya, J. User-guided composition effects for art-based rendering. 2001 ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (March 2001), 99–102. ISBN 1-58113-292-1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer, S., Rosch, E., and Chase, P. Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. Attention and Performance 9 (1981), 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Press, W., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W., and Flannery, B. P. Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ramachandran, V., and Hirstein, W. The science of art a neurological theory of esthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6, 6–7 (1999), 15–51.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sander, F. Gestaltpsychologie und kunsttheorie. ein beitrag zur psychologie der architektur. Neue Psychologische Studien 8 (1931),311–333.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seligmann, D. D., and Feiner, S. Automated generation of intent-based 3d illustrations. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (1991), pp. 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Solso, R. L. Cognition and the Visual Arts. MIT Press/Bradford Books Series in Cognitive Psychology, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Verfaillie, K., and Boutsen, L. A corpus of 714 full-color images of depth-rotated objects. Perception and Psychophysics 57, 7 (1995), 925–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei He, L., Cohen, M. F., and Salesin, D. H. The virtual cinematographer: A paradigm for automatic real-time camera control and directing. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (1996), pp. 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zakia, R. D. Perception and Imaging. Focal Press Publications, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gooch, B., Reinhard, E., Moulding, C., Shirley, P. (2001). Artistic Composition for Image Creation. In: Gortler, S.J., Myszkowski, K. (eds) Rendering Techniques 2001. EGSR 2001. Eurographics. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6242-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6242-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83709-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6242-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics