Skip to main content

Use of Mutual Information to Extract Rules from Artificial Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
  • 471 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of the mutual information for the evaluation of neuron inputs and for the selection of the relevant ones. The rules extraction method is based on the notion of weights templates, parameterizing regions of weights space using the mutual information criteria. The simulation results obtained with this method are very satisfactory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.A. Alexander and M.C. Mozer. Template-based algorithms for connectionnist rule extraction, pages 609–616. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Andrews, J. Diederich, and A.B. Tickle. A survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks. Technical Report QUTNRC-95-01-02, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Battiti. Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(4):537–550, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B.V. Bonnlander and A.S. Weigned. Selecting input variables using mutual information and non-parametric density estimation. In Proceedings of the 1994 International Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ISANN’94). Tainan, Taiwan, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.J. Cherkauer and J.W. Shavlik. Rapid quality estimation of neural network input representations. Neural Information Processing Systems, 8, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.H. Fisher and K.B. McKusick. An empirical comparison of ID3 and back-propagation. In Proceedings of the eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 788–793, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L.M. Fu. Rule generation from neural networks. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 28(8):1114–1124, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.M. Murphy and M.J. Pazzani. ID2-of-3: Constructive induction of N-of-M concepts for discrimination in decision trees. In Proceedings of the Eight International Machine Learning Workshop, pages 183–187, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.W. Shavlik and G.G. Towell. Extracting refined rules from knowledge-based neural networks. Machine learning, pages 71–101, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nedjari, T. (1998). Use of Mutual Information to Extract Rules from Artificial Neural Networks. In: Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6492-1_125

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6492-1_125

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83087-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6492-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics