Skip to main content

Analysing User Deviations in Interactive Safety-Critical Applications

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Eurographics ((EUROGRAPH))

Abstract

Usability and safety problems have often been addressed separately in designing interactive safety-critical applications thus obtaining fragmented results. In this paper we present a method to analyse possible deviations of users in performing their activities in order to elicit safety requirements and to improve design of interactive safety-critical applications. An application of the proposed method to a case study in the Air Traffic Control domain is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abowd G., Wang H., Monk A.; 1995; “A formal technique for automated dialogue development”, Proceedings Designing Interactive Systems’95, August’95, pp.219–226, ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burns, D.J. and Pitblado, R.M. A Modified HAZOP Methodology For Safety Critical System Assessment. Directions in Proc. of the Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, (Bristol, 1993), Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chudleigh, M.F. and Clare, J.N. The benefits of SUSI: Safety Analysis of User System Interaction. In Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability and Security, (Poznan-Kiekrz, Poland, 1993), Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fields, R.E., Harrison, M.D. and Wright, P.C. (1997). THEA: Human Error Analysis for Requirements Definition. University of York, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report YCS-97–294. http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/~bob/papers.html

    Google Scholar 

  5. HAZOP Studies on Systems Containing Programmable Electronics. UK Ministry of Defence Interim Def Stan 00–58, (1996), Issue 1. Available from http://www.dstan.mod.uk/dstan_data/ix-00.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jacquot, J.P., Quesnot, D., Early Specification of User-Interfaces: Toward a Formal Approach. In Proc. ICSE’97, (Boston, USA, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kletz, T. HAZOP and HAZAN: Identifying and Assessing Process Industry Hazards, (1992), Institution of Chemical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leveson, N.G. Safeware: System Safety and Computers — A guide to preventing accidents and losses caused by technology. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maiden, N.A.M. (1998). CREWS-SAVRE: Scenarios for acquiring and validating requirements. City University, CREWS Report Series 98–27.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDermid, J.A. and Pumfrey, D.J. A Development of Hazard Analysis to aid Software Design. Proc. COMPASS’94, IEEE Press. ftp://ftp.cs.york.ac.uk/hise_reports/safety/develop.ps.Z

  11. Paternb, F., “Formal Reasoning about Dialogue Properties with Automatic Support”, Interacting with Computers, 9 (1997), pp.173–196, Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Paternb, F., Model-Based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications, Springer Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paternb, F., Santoro, C., Tahmassebi, S. Formal Models for Cooperative Tasks: Concepts and an Application for En-Route Air Traffic Control. In Proc. DSV-IS ‘88, (Abingdon, U.K., June 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Puerta, A. A Model-Based Interface Development Environment, IEEE Software, pp.40–47, July/August 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reason, J. Human Error. Cambridge University Press, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson S., Johnson P., Kelly C., Cunningham J. and Markopoulos P. (1993). Beyond Hacking: A Model-based Approach to User Interface Design. Proceedings HCI’93. In: People and Computers VIII, Proc. of HCI’93 Conf., Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hollnagel E., Human Reliability Analysis, Academic Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Carrol J, Rosson M., Getting around the task-artefact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario, ACM Transactions Information System, 10, 2, 1992 pp.181–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Fields, B. (1999). Analysing User Deviations in Interactive Safety-Critical Applications. In: Duke, D., Puerta, A. (eds) Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems ’99. Eurographics. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6815-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6815-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83405-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6815-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics