Skip to main content

DMVIS: Design, Modelling and Validation of Interactive Systems

  • Conference paper
Book cover Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems ’97

Part of the book series: Eurographics ((EUROGRAPH))

Abstract

Much of the work reported in the first three DSVIS conferences has concentrated on techniques and languages for specifying and developing interactive systems. In this paper, we argue that a change of emphasis may be necessary as the field matures. We argue that real projects with specific objectives for formal methods are more likely to employ a range of diverse, lightweight modelling techniques. We explore this view by showing how, on one example, several quite different kinds of analysis can be performed using different models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abowd, G., H.-M. Wang, and A. Monk (1995, August). A formal technique for automated dialogue developments. In Proceedings, First Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems — DIS’95, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, A., M.-C. Gaudel, and B. Marre (1995, September). An experiment on the validation of a specification by heterogeneous formal means: The transit node. In 5th IFIP Working Conference on Dependable Computing for Critical Applications (DCCA-5), Urbana-Champaign, USA, pp. 24 – 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, P. and J. May (1995). Interactions with advanced graphical interfaces and the deployment of latent human knowledge. See Paterno (1995), pp. 15 – 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandford, A., M. Harrison, and P. Barnard (1995). Using interaction framework to guide the design of interactive systems. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 43, 101 - 130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodart, F. and J. Vanderdonckt (Eds.) (1996). Design, Specification, Verification of Interactive Systems’96, Springer Computer Science. Springer Wien New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell, C. (1995). Formal aspects of the Design Rationale of Interactive Systems. Ph. D. thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell, C., B. Fields, and M. Harrison (1995). Exploring design options rationally. See Palanque and Bastide (1995a), pp. 134 – 148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, A. (1991). Formal Methods for Interactive Systems. Computers and People Series. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, A., J. Finlay, G. Abowd, and R. Beale (1993). Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faconti, G. P. and D. J. Duke (1996). Device models. See Bodart and Vanderdonckt (1996), pp. 73 – 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, B., M. Harrison, and P. Wright (1995). Modelling interactive systems and providing task relevant information. See Paterno (1995), pp. 253 – 266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. R. G. (1989). Cognitive dimensions of notations. In A. Sutcliffe and L. Macaulay (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the BCS HCI Special Interest Group, pp. 443–460. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M., A. Blandford, and P. Barnard (1995). The requirements engineering of user freedom. See Paterno (1995), pp. 181 – 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M., C. Roast, and P. Wright (1989). Complementary methods for the iterative design of interactive systems. In G. Salvendy and M. Smith (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge-Based Systems, pp. 651–658. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, K. (1986). Archtectural Design: An analogy. In D. Norman and S. Draper (Eds.), User-Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human Computer Interaction, Chapter 1, pp. 9–23. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J., S. Scott, and P. Barnard (1995). Structuring Displays: A Psychological Guide. Eurographics Tutorial Notes Series. EACG: Geneva. Appeared as Amodeus report B04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, A. and M. Curry (1994). Discount dialogue modelling with Action Simulator. In G. Cockton, S. Draper, and G. Weir (Eds.), Proceedings, HCI’94, Number IX in People and Computers, pp. 327 – 338. BCS HCI Specialist Group: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuseibeh, B. (1996). To be And not to be: On managing inconsistency in software development. In Proceedings of 8th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design (IWSSD-8), pp. 164-169. IEEE CS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D., A. Monk, and M. Curry (1995). Algorithms for automatic dialogue analysis using propositional production systems. Human Computer Interaction 10, 39 – 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanque, P. and R. Bastide (Eds.) (1995a). Design, Specification, Verification of Interactive Systems ’95, Springer Computer Science. Springer Wien New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palanque, P. and R. Bastide (1995b). Petri net-based design of user-driven interfaces using the interactive cooperative objects formalism. See Paterno (1995), pp. 383– 400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palanque, P., F. Paternò, R. Bastide, and M. Mezzanote (1996). Towards and integrated proposal for interactive systems design based in TLIM and ICO. See Bodart and Vanderdonckt (1996), pp. 162 – 187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnas, D. L. (1996, April). Mathematical methods: What we need and don’t need. IEEE Computer, 28 – 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterno, F. (Ed.) (1995). Interactive Systems: Design, Specification and Verification, Focus on Computer Graphics Series. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterno, F., M. Sciacchitano, and J. Lowgren (1995). A user interface evaluation mapping physical user actions to task-driven formal specifications. See Palanque and Bastide (1995a), pp. 35 – 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwillus, G. and K. Kespohl (1996). Prototyping device interfaces with DSN/2. See Bodart and Vanderdonckt (1996), pp. 123 – 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H.-M. and G. Abowd (1994, July). A tabular interface for automated verification of event-based dialogues. Technical Report CMU-CS-94-189, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., B. Fields, and M. Harrison (1996). Distributed information resources: A new approach to interaction modelling. In T. Green, J. Canas, and C. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings ofECCE8: European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 5-10. EACE. URL: http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/~bob/papers.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fields, B., Merriam, N., Dearden, A. (1997). DMVIS: Design, Modelling and Validation of Interactive Systems. In: Harrison, M.D., Torres, J.C. (eds) Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems ’97. Eurographics. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6878-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6878-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83055-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6878-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics