Abstract
Some recent discussions in the service science community have been around the need for research on and innovation of human-centered service systems (HCSS) from a multiple discipline perspective. HCSS are complex because of the involvement of people, multiple stakeholders with usually incommensurate value systems spanning networks of resources. Designers of such systems have to draw knowledge and connections from service science, system thinking, design thinking, business, and engineering. In this research, we build an underpinning of the system thinking aspect of service design based on Churchman’s The Design of Inquiring Systems and Swanson’s Churchman’s Theory of Design Integrity as an important aspect of the education of service designers. This will form the philosophical foundation of a creed or set of beliefs and aims that will guide the service designer’s actions. Of particular relevance to service system design is Swanson’s interpretation of Churchman’s work to propose a Theory of Design Integrity, i.e., designing the wholeness, soundness, and virtue of a system. A system professional can design such a system with precepts based on Churchman’s necessary conditions to conceive a system S: it is teleological; it has a measure of performance, a client whose interests (value) are served, teleological components, an environment, a decision maker of resources, and a designer with good intentions to maximize the system’s value to the client; and it is stable. Even though Churchman was not specifically referring to service systems, we see that his ideas are as fresh today as then in applying the precepts to value cocreation scenarios. The Theory of Design Integrity also explicitly offers a virtue component that is lacking in the current service design literature. We feel that this should be an essential part of a service designer’s creed in today’s climate of privacy and security concerns. Swanson also introduced the role of a social witness as an observer who evaluates the system’s design integrity by maintaining a critical and responsible stance not separable from the system. We will illustrate the applicability of the Creed for Service Designers with service system scenarios and describe how it could be incorporated into service design education.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Stamoulis et al. (2003) for an interesting discussion of ateleological development of “Design-Decisions-Independent” Information Systems.
References
Churchman, C. W. (1968) The Systems Approach. Delacorte Press, New York.
Churchman, C. W. (1971) The Design of Inquiring Systems. Basic Books, New York.
Kwan, S. K. & Müller-Gorchs, M. (2011). Constructing Effective Value Propositions for Stakeholders in Service System Networks. Proceedings of AIS SIGSVC Workshop.
Kwan, S. K. (2013) “Service Design and Innovation SIG Workshop”. Presented at the 1st International Conference on Serviceology (ICServ 2013), October 16–18, 2013, Tokyo, Japan (available at http://slideshare.net/stephenkwan).
Kwan S. K. (2014) “T-shaped Professionals”. Presented at Spartan Thinkers Society, April 17th, 2014, San José, California, USA.
Kwan, S. K. & Hottum, P. (2014). Mantaining Consistent Customer Experience in Service System Networks. Service Science, 6 (2), 136–147.
Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L. (2014) Service-Dominant Logic, Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities. Cambridge University Press.
Maglio, P., Kwan, S. K., & Spohrer, J. (2015) “Commentary: Toward a Research Agenda for Human-Centered Service System Innovation”. Service Science 7:1; March 2105, pp. 1–10.
Norman, D. A. (2011) Living with Complexity. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G. & Smith, A. (2014) Value Proposition Design. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
Polaine, A., Løvlie, L. & Reason, B. (2013) Service Design. Brooklyn: Rosenfeld Media.
Stickdorn, M.; Schneider, J. (ed.) (2011) This is Service Design Thinking: Basics – Tools – Cases (1st ed). BIS Publishers, Amsterdam.
Stamoulis, D., Theotokis, D., Martakos, D., & Gyftodimos, G. (2003) Ateleological development of “Design-Decisions-Independent” Information Systems. In Patel, N. (ed.) Adaptive Evolutionary Information Systems. Idea Group Publishing.
E. Burton Swanson (1994) “Churchman’s Theory of Design Integrity”. Interfaces 24: July–August 1994 (pp. 54–59).
Yamauchi, Y. (2015) “Services as Struggles: Research on Customer Interactions” (in Japanese), Chuokeizaisha.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Japan
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kwan, S.K., Yamauchi, Y. (2017). A Creed for Service Designers. In: Sawatani, Y., Spohrer, J., Kwan, S., Takenaka, T. (eds) Serviceology for Smart Service System. ICServ 2015. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56074-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56074-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-56072-2
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-56074-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)