Abstract
This study employs the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique, an efficiency model, to measure public schools in Thailand. Data came from 455 public upper secondary schools in Northern Thailand. The results reveal that the schools mostly operate inefficiently. To ascertain the efficiency measures, sensitivity analysis reveals the robustness of the resulting efficiency measures on efficiency. Policy to improve school efficiency may thus consider using efficiency-based analysis for measuring school performance to identify which school will yield higher marginal returns to prioritize inefficient schools for treatment, in addition to allocating budget based on block grants or enrolments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Y.C. Cheng, and T. Townsend, Educational change and development in the Asia Pacific region: Trends and issues. In T. Townsend & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Education change and development in the Asia Pacific: Challenges for the future (pp.318-343). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000.
P. Hallinger, “Educational change in Southeast Asia: The challenge of creating learning systems.” J. of Ed. Admin., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 492-509, 1998.
A. Booth, “Education and economic development in Southeast Asia: Myths and realities.” ASEAN Econ. Bul., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 290-306, 1999.
OEC, Education in Thailand 2004, Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing. 2004.
B. Watcharasriroj, and J.C.S. Tang, “The effect of size and information technology on hospital efficiency.” J. of Hi. Tech. Manage. Res., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2004.
R. Manandhar, and J.C.S. Tang, “The evaluation of bank branch performance using data envelopment analysis: A framework.” J. of Hi. Tech. Manage. Res., vol.13, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2002.
B. Mante, and G. O’Brien, “Efficiency measurement of Australian public sector organizations: The case of state secondary schools in Victoria.” J. of Ed. Admin., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 274-296, 2002.
A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” Eur. J. of Oper. R., vol. 2, pp. 429-444, 1978.
S. Bradley, G. Johnes, and J. Millington, “The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England.” Eur. J. of Oper. R., vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 545-568, 2001.
T. Kirjavainen, and H.A. Loikkanen, “Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and Tobit analysis.” Econ. of Ed. Rev., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 377–394, 1998.
M.J. Mancebόn, and E. Bandrés, “Efficiency evaluation in secondary schools: The key role of model specification and of ex post analysis of results.” Ed. Econ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 131-152, 1999.
A.C. Soteriou, E. Karahanna, C. Papanastasiou, and M.S. Diakourakis, “Using DEA to evaluate the efficiency of secondary schools: The case of Cyprus.” Inter. J. of Ed. Manage., vol. 12, no. 2, pp 65-73, 1998.
S. Kantabutra, Assessment of size effects on efficiency, a proceeding paper for the 3rd International Conference on Engineering Education, Instructional Technology, Assessment, and E-learning (EIAE 07), Bridgeport, USA, 2007.
S. Kantabutra, and J.C.S. Tang, “Urban-rural and size effects on school efficiency: The case of Northern Thailand.” Lead. and Pol. in Sch., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 355-377, 2006.
S. Kantabutra, and S. Kantabutra, Investigating relationships between shared vision and public school performance: A proposed model, a proceeding paper for International Conference on Making Educational Reform Happen: Learning from the Asian Experience and Comparative Perspectives, September 2004, Bangkok, Thailand, 2004.
S. Kantabutra, and S. Kantabutra, Heightening public school performance through vision-based leadership: A Thai perspective, a proceeding paper for International Conference on Quality Educational Leadership: A Partnership of East and West, November 2005, Bangkok, Thailand, 2005.
S. Kantabutra, and S. Kantabutra, Relating shared vision components to Thai public school performance, a proceeding paper for International Conference on Powerful Visions: Do they work in Asia, the 5th Annual Conference of the Asia Academy of Management, December 2006, Tokyo, Japan, 2006.
F. Engert, “The reporting of school district efficiency: The adequacy of ratio measures.” J. of Public Budg., Acc. & Fin. Manage., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 247-271, 1996.
P.J. de Lancer, “Decision-making tools for public productivity improvement: A comparison of DEA to cost-benefit and regression analyses. J. of Pub. Bud. Acc. and Fin. Ma., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 625-646, 2000.
D.F. Primont, and Domazlicky, B. “Student achievement and efficiency in Missouri schools and the No Child Left Behind Act.”, Econ. of Ed. Rev., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 77-90, 2006.
S. Waldo, “On the use of student data in efficiency analysis-Technical efficiency in Swedish upper secondary school.” Econ. of Ed. Rev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 173-185, 2007.
T. Coelli, D.S.P Rao, and G.E. Battese, An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Boston: Kluwer, 1998.
P. Chalos, and J. Cherian, “An application of data envelopment analysis to public sector performance measurement and accountability.” J. of Acc. and Pub.Pol., vol. 14, pp. 143-160, 1995.
W.J Fowler, Jr., and H.J. Walberg, “School size, characteristics, and outcomes.” Ed. Evalu. and Pol. Ana., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 189-202, 1991.
M.A. Muñiz, “Separating managerial inefficiency and external conditions in data envelopment analysis.” Eur. J. of Oper. R., vol. 143, pp. 625-643, 2002.
J.A. Ganley, and J.S. Cubbin, Public sector efficiency measurement. Applications of data envelopment analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992.
Acknowledgment
Author would like to thank Mr. Burin Kantabutra for the support to edit and share his time dedication and his crucial insights throughout this research works.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kantabutra, S. (2010). Performance-Based Measurement for Thai Educational Organization: A DEA Management Model. In: Iskander, M., Kapila, V., Karim, M. (eds) Technological Developments in Education and Automation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3656-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3656-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3655-1
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3656-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)