Abstract
Double degrees (also known as combined degrees) typically allow engineering students to complete, in just 5 years, two degrees that would ordinarily take 7 years to complete. This paper provides and discusses the results of a pilot study relating to engineering double degrees. The study participants offered opinions relating to non-engineering fields of interest, and why they enrolled in their current double degree course. The study found that double degree students appear to be interested in breadth, but not depth. This finding seems to contradict a prevailing view that double degrees offer students the potential to gain depth in a particular niche or “overlap area” between the two degrees. The paper also discusses double degree curricula, in particular, the subjects that are from a typical double degree. It is noted that some elements that would ordinarily be strongly associated with depth and critical thinking seem to be missing from double degrees. The issue is exemplified in this paper by focusing on one aspect of critical thinking: probabilistic reasoning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Nisbett, R.E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C. and Kunda, Z.. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339-363.
Welsman, S.J. (2007). Double or nothing! Clever thinking, double-degree frustration, and returns to Science, URL: www.science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/2007 (Accessed 1.3.2008)
King, R. (2008). Addressing the supply and quality of engineering graduates for the new century Australia: Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education
Russell, A., Dolnicar, S. and Ayoub M. (2008). Double degrees: double the trouble or twice the return? Higher Education, 55:575-591.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
Fong, G.T. Krantz, D.H. and Nisbett, R.E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253-292.
Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Moulton, B. (2010). Double Degrees: Concerns Regarding Overall Standards and Graduate Attributes such as Probabilistic Reasoning. In: Iskander, M., Kapila, V., Karim, M. (eds) Technological Developments in Education and Automation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3656-8_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3656-8_60
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3655-1
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3656-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)