Skip to main content

Double Degrees: Concerns Regarding Overall Standards and Graduate Attributes such as Probabilistic Reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technological Developments in Education and Automation

Abstract

Double degrees (also known as combined degrees) typically allow engineering students to complete, in just 5 years, two degrees that would ordinarily take 7 years to complete. This paper provides and discusses the results of a pilot study relating to engineering double degrees. The study participants offered opinions relating to non-engineering fields of interest, and why they enrolled in their current double degree course. The study found that double degree students appear to be interested in breadth, but not depth. This finding seems to contradict a prevailing view that double degrees offer students the potential to gain depth in a particular niche or “overlap area” between the two degrees. The paper also discusses double degree curricula, in particular, the subjects that are from a typical double degree. It is noted that some elements that would ordinarily be strongly associated with depth and critical thinking seem to be missing from double degrees. The issue is exemplified in this paper by focusing on one aspect of critical thinking: probabilistic reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nisbett, R.E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C. and Kunda, Z.. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Welsman, S.J. (2007). Double or nothing! Clever thinking, double-degree frustration, and returns to Science, URL: www.science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/2007 (Accessed 1.3.2008)

  3. King, R. (2008). Addressing the supply and quality of engineering graduates for the new century Australia: Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education

    Google Scholar 

  4. Russell, A., Dolnicar, S. and Ayoub M. (2008). Double degrees: double the trouble or twice the return? Higher Education, 55:575-591.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fong, G.T. Krantz, D.H. and Nisbett, R.E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Moulton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moulton, B. (2010). Double Degrees: Concerns Regarding Overall Standards and Graduate Attributes such as Probabilistic Reasoning. In: Iskander, M., Kapila, V., Karim, M. (eds) Technological Developments in Education and Automation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3656-8_60

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics