Skip to main content

Effects of Online MCQ Tests on Student Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Getting students to understand the concepts of a technically sound subject – Business Data Communication and Networks, done by non-technical (i.e. business) students was the challenge. A set of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ), around 40 to 50 of them per chapter were posted on the subject Blackboard as online MCQ tests that the students could take at their own pace, after a chapter is finished. They were encouraged to do it as a part of their learning exercise though no marks were given for it. Once they complete the test, they could see the answers and the mistakes they made, through immediate feedbacks. There were eight students who participated. The MCQ sets were posted online in two sessions. In session 1, MCQs for the first four chapters were posted. Later, their understanding of concepts was checked through a mid-semester test, covering these four chapters. In the second session, MCQs for the next seven chapters were posted and their understanding was tested through a final examination, covering these seven chapters. The output graphs of the assessment scores show generally, that the students who did the MCQ tests well, performed well in mid-semester test and final exam too. Those who did badly comparatively in MCQs, fared poorly in mid-semester test and final exam as well. Some exceptions were there, where some student(s) who did a bit of hard work through MCQs, did not perform that well (but not very badly too) in the test or exam. A regression analysis is done between MCQ test results and the mid-semester test and final exam. Quantitative and qualitative analyses done on a brief survey conducted with the students confirmed the effects of the observed learning process, through the use of online MCQs. This could very well be extended to large classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Nicol, “E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect,” Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 31(1), pp. 53–64, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V. L. Clegg and W. E. Cashin, “Improving multiple-choice tests,” Idea Paper No. 16, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. P. Sevenair and A. R. Burkett, “Difficulty and discrimination of multiple choice questions: A counterintuitive result,” Journal of Chemistry Education, vol. 61, 441-442, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Atkinson and R. O’Connor, “The Application of Multiple Choice Questions in a Computer Environment as a Method of Learning rather than of Assessment,” MCE Working Papers 1999, Dublin City University, Ireland, pp.1-11, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. H. Kwen and A. K. Cheng, “Using two tier reflective multiple choice questions to cater to creative thinking," AARE 2005 International Education Research Conference, pp.1-11, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Ramesh, S. M. Sidhu and G. K. Watugala, “Exploring the Potential of Multiple Choice Questions in Computer-Based Assessment of Student Learning,” Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, vol. 2(1), pp.1-15, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. B. Williams, “Assertion-reason multiple-choice testing as a tool for deep learning: A qualitative analysis,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 31(3), pp.287-301, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. B. Connelly, “Assertion-reason assessment in formative and summative tests: results from two graduate case studies,” in: R. Ottewill, E. Borredon, L. Falque, B. Macfarlane & A. Wall (Eds) Educational innovation in economics and business VIII: pedagogy, technology and innovation (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers), 2004, pp. 359–378.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Harper, “Multiple-choice Questions – A Reprieve,” Bioscience Education eJournal, 2003. [Online]: http://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/journal/vol2/beej-2-6.htm

  10. R. A. Dewey, Writing Multiple Choice Items which Require Comprehension,[Online]: http://www.psywww.com/selfquiz/aboutq.htm, Retrieved on August 15, 2008.

  11. P. Hosie and T. Mazzarol, “Using technology for the competitive delivery of education services,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.15, pp.118-128, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Williams, “The learning web: the development, implementation and evaluation of internet-based undergraduate materials for the teaching of key skills,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 3, pp.40-53, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Issac, B., Jacob, S. (2010). Effects of Online MCQ Tests on Student Learning. In: Iskander, M., Kapila, V., Karim, M. (eds) Technological Developments in Education and Automation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3656-8_73

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics