Skip to main content

Relative Ranking – A Biased Rating

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations and Advances in Computer Sciences and Engineering

Abstract

Reviewers’ ratings have become one of the most influential parameters when making a decision to purchase or rent the products or services from the online vendors. Star Rating system is the de-facto standard for rating a product. It is regarded as one of the most visually appealing rating systems that directly interact with the consumers; helping them find products they will like to purchase as well as register their views on the product. It offers visual advantage to pick the popular or most rated product. Any system that is not as appealing as star system will have a chance of rejection by online business community. This paper argues that, the visual advantage is not enough to declare star rating system as a triumphant, the success of a ranking system should be measured by how effectively the system helps customers make decisions that they, retrospectively, consider correct. This paper argues and suggests a novel approach of Relative Ranking within the boundaries of star rating system to overcome a few inherent disadvantages the former system comes with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hanna Yehuda and Jennifer McGinn. “Coming to Terms: Comparing and Combining the Results of Multiple Evaluators Performing Heuristic Evaluation”; CHI 2007, April 28-May 3, 2007, San Jose, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muzaffer Ozakca and Youn-Kyung Lim. “A Study of Reviews and Ratings on the Internet”; CHI 2006, April 22-27, 2006, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  3. Juha Leino and Kari-Jouko Raiha. “Case Amazon: Ratings and Reviews as Part of Recommendations”; RecSys ‘07, October 19-20, 2007, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ba-Quy Vuong, Ee-Peng Lim, Aixin Sun, Minh-Tam Le, Hady Wirawan Lauw and Kuiyu Chang. “On Ranking Controversies in Wikipedia: Models and Evaluation”; WSDM ‘08, February 11-12, 2008, Palo Alto, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tzu-Kuo Huang, Chih-Jen Lin and Ruby C. Weng. “Ranking Individuals by Group Comparisons”; 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, 2006, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.burj-al-arab.com/, accessed on Friday, May 14th 2008

  7. www.sfgate.com/eguide/movies/reviews/, accessed on Friday, May 14th 2008

  8. Turnbull, Don, “Rating, Voting and Ranking: Designing for Collaboration and Consensus”, CHI 2007, San Jose, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Linden Greg, Smith Brent, and York Jeremy, “Amazon.com Recommendations – item-to-item Collaborative Filtering”, IEEE Intelligent Computing, Jan-Feb 2003

  10. www.YouTube.com

  11. www.Digg.com

  12. www.Netflix.com

  13. www.IMDB.com

  14. William H. Kruskal and W. Allen Wallis. Use of ranks in onecriterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47 (260): 583–621, December 1952

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilcoxon_signed-rank_test, accessed on August 1st 2008

  16. www.amazon.com

  17. www.ebay.com

  18. J. Ben Schafer, Joseph A. Konstan and John Riedl, “E-commerce Recommender Applications”, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 5, pp. 115–153, 2001

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang, Elizabeth and Hussain, Farookh Khadeer and Dillon, Tharam S. 2005. : Trustworthiness Measure for e-Service, Third Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, 12-14 Oct 2005. St. Andrews, New Brunswick, Canada: University of New Brunswick, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dhar, Vasant,Does Chatter Matter? The Impact of User-Generated Content on Music Sales(February 2008). CeDER Working Paper No. 07-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1113536

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeeshan-ul-hassan Usman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Usman, Zuh., Alghamdi, F.A., Tariq, A., Puri, T.N. (2010). Relative Ranking – A Biased Rating. In: Sobh, T. (eds) Innovations and Advances in Computer Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3658-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3658-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3657-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3658-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics