Skip to main content

Escaping Death – Geometrical Recommendations for High Value Targets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Innovations and Advances in Computer Sciences and Engineering

Abstract

Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) and Suicide Bombing have become the headline news for every other day. It is a growing global phenomenon that is happening from Iraq to Afghanistan, Syria to United Kingdom and Spain to Pakistan. An average US soldier in Iraq receives 6 to 23 blast wave shocks over his/her tenure in Iraq. Pakistan has witnessed 120 suicide bombing attacks in last six years. While various attempts have been made to assess the impact of blast overpressure on buildings and animals, little has been done on crowd formation, crowd density and underlying geometry to mitigate the effects. This paper is set to make geometrical recommendations to reduce the casualties in case of such an incident for high value targets, like mosques and army facilities in the frontline countries fighting the global war on terrorism. A virtual simulation tool has been developed which is capable of assessing the impact of crowd formation patterns and their densities on the magnitude of injury and number of casualties during a suicide bombing attack. Results indicated that the worst crowd formation is street (Zig-Zag) where 30% crowd can be dead and 45% can be injured, given typical explosive carrying capacity of a single suicide bomber. Row wise crowd formations was found to be the best for reducing the effectiveness of an attack with 18% crowd in lethal zone and 38% in injury zones. For a typical suicide bombing attack, we can reduce the number of fatalities by 12%, and the number of injuries by 7%. Simulation results were compared and validated by the real-life incidents and found to be in good agreement. Line-of-sight with the attacker, rushing towards the exit, and stampede were found to be the most lethal choices both during and after the attack. These findings, although preliminary, may have implications for emergency response and counter terrorism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Air Force, “U.S. Air Force Installation Force Protection Guide”, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azam, Jean-Paul, “Suicide-bombing as inter- generational investment”, Public Choice. Springer. 122, 177-198, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, Paul W., “Explosive Engineering”, Wiley-VCH, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. FEMA, “Explosive Blast Manual”, Section 4.1. Federal Emergency Management Association Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ganor, Boaz, “The Rationality of the Islamic Radical Suicide Attack Phenomenon”, Countering Suicide Terrorism, Institute of Counter Terrorism, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, Dipak K. & Mundra, Kusum, “Suicide Bombing as a Strategic Weapon: An Empirical Investigation of Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Terrorism and Political Violence”, 17, 573-598, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harrison, Mark, “The Immediate Effects of Suicide Attacks”, University of Warwick, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harrison, Mark, “Bombers and Bystanders in Suicide Attacks in Isreal 2000 to 2003”, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 29, 187- 206, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinney, Gilbert & Graham, Kenneth, “Explosive Shocks in Air”, 2nd Sub edition. Springer, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kress, Moshe, “The Effect of Crowd Density on the Expected Number of Casualties in a Suicide Attack”, Wiley Periodicals, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lester, David, Yang, Bijou & Lindsay, Mark. “Suicide Bombers: Are Psychological Profiles Possible?”, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 27, 283-295, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pape, Robert A., “Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism”, Random House, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  13. Irwin, R. J., Lerner, M. R., Bealer, J. F., Mantor, P. C., Brackett, D. J., and Tuggle, D. W., “Shock after blast wave injury is caused by a vagally mediated reflex”, Journal of Trauma, Volume 47, p. 105-110, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stiglitz, Joseph and Bilmes, Linda, “Three Trillion Dollar War, Norton and Company, July 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeeshan-ul-hassan Usmani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Usmani, Zuh., Imana, E.Y., Kirk, D. (2010). Escaping Death – Geometrical Recommendations for High Value Targets. In: Sobh, T. (eds) Innovations and Advances in Computer Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3658-2_88

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3658-2_88

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3657-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3658-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics