Abstract
The only way nowadays to improve stability of software development process in the global rapidly evolving world is to be innovative and involve professionals into projects motivating them using both material and non material factors. In this paper self-organized teams are discussed. Unfortunately not all kind of organizations can benefit directly from agile method including applying self-organized teams. The paper proposes semi-self-organized teams presenting it as a new and promising motivating factor allowing deriving many positive sides of been self-organized and partly agile and been compliant to less strict conditions for following this innovating process. The semi-self organized teams are reliable at least in the short-term perspective and are simple to organize and support.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A.A. Khan, “Tale of two methodologies for web development: heavyweight vs agile”, Postgraduate Minor Research Project, 2004, pp. 619-690.
D. Kumlander, “Software design by uncertain requirements”, Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering, 2006, pp. 224-2296.
M. A. Armstrong, “Handbook of Personnel Management Practice”, Kogan Page, London, UK, 1991.
M. Rauterberg, O. Strohm, “Work organization and software Development”, Annual Review of Automatic Programming, vol. 16, 1992, pp. 121-128.
D. Daly, and B. H. Kleiner, “How to motivate problem employees”, Work Study,vol. 44 (2), 1995, pp. 5-7.
B. Gerhart, “How important are dispositional factors as determinants of job satisfaction? Implications for job design and other personnel programs”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 72 (3), 1987, pp. 366-373.
F. Herzberg, “One more time: How do you motivate employees?” Harvard Bus. Rev., vol. 65 (5), 1987, pp. 109-120.
R.E. Miles, C.C. Snow, and G. Miles, “TheFuture.org”, Long range planning, vol. 33 (3), 2000, pp. 300-321.
R. A. Guzzo, and M.W. Dickson, “Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness”, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 47, 1997, pp. 307-338.
N.B. Moe, T. Dingsoyr, and T. Dyba, “Understanding Self-Organizing Teams in Agile Software Development”, Australian Software Engineering Conference, 2008, pp. 76-85.
D. Kumlander, “On using software engineering projects as an additional personnel motivating factor”, WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, vol. 3 (4), 2006, pp. 261-267.
M. Fenton-O'Creevy, “Employee involvement and the middle manager: evidence from a survey of organizations”, J. of Organizational Behavior, vol. 19 (1), 1998, pp. 67-84.
M. Hoegl, and K.P. Parboteeah, “Autonomy and teamwork in innovative projects”, Human Resource Management, vol. 45 (1), 2006, pp. 67-79.
C.W. Langfred, “The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups”, J. of Organizational Behavior, 2000, vol. 21 (5), 2000, pp. 563-585.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kumlander, D. (2010). Motivating Company Personnel by Applying the Semi-self-organized Teams Principle. In: Sobh, T., Elleithy, K. (eds) Innovations in Computing Sciences and Software Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9112-3_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9112-3_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9111-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9112-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)