Skip to main content

An Approach to Measuring Software Quality Perception

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1220 Accesses

Abstract

Perception measuring and perception management is an emerging approach in the area of product management. Cognitive, psychological, behavioral and neurological theories, tools and methods are being employed for a better understanding of the mechanisms of a consumer’s attitude and decision processes. Software is also being defined as a product, however this kind of product is significantly different from all other products. Software products are intangible and it is difficult to trace their characteristics which are strongly dependant on a dynamic context of use.

Understanding customer’s cognitive processes gives an advantage to the producers aiming to develop products “winning the market”. Is it possible to adopt theories, methods and tools for the purpose of software perception, especially software quality perception? The theoretical answer to this question seems to be easy, however in practice the list of differences between software products and software projects hinders the analysis of certain factors and their influence on the overall perception.

In this article the authors propose a method and describe a tool designed for the purpose of research regarding perception issues of software quality. The tool is designed to defeat the above stated problem, adopting the modern behavioral economics approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. IEEE SwEBoK. Software Engineering Body of Knowledge. s.l.: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, http://www.swebok.org/, 2004.

  2. Hofman, R. Software quality perception. [book auth.] CISSE2008. Innovations and Advanced Techniques in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering. s.l.: Springer (w przygotowaniu), 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McCall, J., Richards, P. and Walters, G. Factors In software quality. s.l.: Griffiths Air Force Base, NY, Rome Air Development Center Air Force Systems Command, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boehm, B., et al. Characteristics of software quality. New York: American Elsevier, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO/IEC SQuaRE. The seconod generation of standards for software product quality. Suryn, W. and Abran, A. 2003. IASTED2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. SQuaRE based Web Services Quality Model. Abramowicz, W., et al. Hong Kong: International Association of Engineers, 2008. International Conference on Internet Computing and Web Services. ISBN: 978-988-98671-8-8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Camerer, C. and Loewenstein, G. Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future (introduction for Advances in Behavioral Economics). Mimeo: Carnegie Mellon University, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. 1776. Chapter IV: Of the Origin and Use of Money.

    Google Scholar 

  9. —. The theory of moral sentiments. London: A. Millar , 1759.

    Google Scholar 

  10. "Prospect" theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 47, 1979, Econometrica.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nęcka, E., Orzechowski, J. and Szymura, B. Psychologia poznawcza. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science. 1974, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rational choice and structure of environments. Simon, H. 63, 1956, Psychological review.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Becker, G. Crime and punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Akerlof, G. The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1970, 84.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nobel Foundation. Nobelprize.org. All Laureates in Economics. [Online] [Cited: 07 27, 2009.] http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/.

  17. Boring, E. A History of Experimental Psychology. Second Edition. s.l.: Prentice-Hall, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Who Is the Founder of Psychophysics and Experimental Psychology? Khaleefa, O. 16, 1999, American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steenkamp, J., Wierenga, B. and Meulenberg, M. Kwali-teits-perceptie van voedingsmiddelen deel 1. Swoka. Den Haag: s.n., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shaughnessy, J., Zechmeister, E. and Zechmeister, J. Research Methods in Psychology. Seventh edition. s.l.: McGraw-Hill, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  21. List, A. Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence From The Marketplace. Econometrica. 2004, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. [book auth.] D. Kahneman, A. Tversky and P. Slovic. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alagumalai, S., Curtis, D. and Hungi, N. Applied Rash Measurement: A book of exemplars. s.l.: Springer-Kluwer, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stevens, S. Measurement, Psychophisics and Utility. [book auth.] C. Churchman and Ratoosh P. Definitions and Theories. New York: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levitt, S. and List, J. Field Experiments in Economics: The Past, The Present, and The Future. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henslin, J. Sociology: a down to earth approach. nineth edition. s.l.: Pearson Education, 2008. ISBN 978-0-205-57023-2.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stavrinoudis, D., et al. Early Estimation of Users' Perception of Software Quality. Software Quality Journal. 2005, Vol. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osgood, C., Suci, G. and Tannenbaum, P. The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  29. The earth is round (p<0,05). Cohen, J. 49, 1995, American psychologist.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ferguson, G. and Takane, Y. Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. Sixth Edition. Montréal, Quebec: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  32. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. [Online] http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radoslaw Hofman PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hofman, R. (2010). An Approach to Measuring Software Quality Perception. In: Sobh, T., Elleithy, K. (eds) Innovations in Computing Sciences and Software Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9112-3_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9112-3_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9111-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9112-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics