Abstract
The goal of this chapter is to evaluate the efficiency of three versions of the well known gossip algorithm, namely: basic gossip, push-sum and broadcast, for the distributed solution of averaging problems. The main focus is on the impact of link failures that, reducing the network connectivity, decrease the convergence speed. As a similar effect occurs in non-fully-meshed networks, because of a limited coverage radius of the nodes, a comparison is made between these two scenarios. The considered algorithms can require optimization of some share factors; to this purpose, we resort to simulations, but the conclusions achieved are confirmed through analytical arguments, exploiting the concept of potential function.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barrenetxea G et al (2007) DemoAbstract: SensorScope, an urban environmental monitoring network. In: 4th European conference on wireless sensor networks (EWSN 2007), Delft, Netherlands, Jan 2007
Baker B, Shostak R (1972) Gossips and telephones. Discrete Math 2(3):191–193
Berman G (1973) The gossip problem. Discrete Math 4(1):91
Boyd S, Ghosh A, Prabhakar B, Shah D (2006) Randomized gossip algorithms. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(6):2508–2530
Kempe D, Dobra A, Gehrke J (2003) Gossip based computation of aggregate information. In: IEEE conference on foundation of computer science, Cambridge, MA, Oct 2003, pp 482–491
Zanaj E, Baldi M, Chiaraluce F (2009) Optimal share factors in the push-sum algorithm for ring and random geometric graph sensor networks. J Commun Softw Syst 5(1):9–18
Baldi M, Chiaraluce F, Zanaj E (2009) Fault tolerance in sensor networks: performance comparison of some gossip algorithms. In: 7th international workshop on intelligent solutions in embedded systems (WISES 2009), Ancona, Italy, June 2009, pp 11–20
Patwari N, Ash JN, Kyperountas S, Hero AO III, Moses RL, Correal NS (2005) Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Signal Process Mag 22(4):54–69
Dimakis AG, Sarwate AD, Wainwright MJ (2008) Geographic gossip: efficient averaging for sensor networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 56(3):1205–1216
Zanaj E, Baldi M, Chiaraluce F (2007) Efficiency of the gossip algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In: 2007 international conference on software, telecommunications and computer networks (SoftCOM 2007), Split, Dubrovnik, Croatia, Sept 2007, Paper 7072
Zanaj E, Baldi M, Chiaraluce F (2008) Efficiency of unicast and broadcast gossip algorithms for wireless sensor networks. J Commun Softw Syst 4(2):105–112
Baldi M, Chiaraluce F, Zanaj E (2008) Comparison of averaging algorithms for wireless sensor networks. In: International conference on information and communication technologies (ICTTA’08), Damascus, Syria, Apr 2008, Paper TEL05_7
Merris R (1995) A survey of graph Laplacians. Linear Multilinear Algebra 39(1 and 2):19–31
Mohar B (1991) The Laplacian spectrum of graphs. In: Alavi Y, Chartrand G, Oellermann OR, Schwenk AJ (eds) Graph theory, combinatorics, and applications, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 871–898
Shawe-Taylor J, Cristianini N (2004) Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge University Press, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baldi, M., Chiaraluce, F., Zanaj, E. (2011). Performance of Gossip Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Conti, M., Orcioni, S., Martínez Madrid, N., Seepold, R. (eds) Solutions on Embedded Systems. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0638-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0638-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0637-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0638-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)