Abstract
Not only that the theorem which Löwenheim proved 1915 was the first big result in what we now call Model Theory, but, primarily due to Skolem, who profoundly analyzed and understood the significance of its far-reaching consequences, the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem made also a revolutionary impact on the history of the twentieth century mathematics, and philosophy of mathematics in particular. Among the consequences, the most disastrous were those that concerned Hilbert’s categoricity demand and Cantor’s concept of cardinality. In this article, it is argued that though it should be admitted that the first group of consequences, related to the possibility of non-standard models, clearly pointed to the expressive weakness of the (first-order) language in which, in the first three decades of the last century, the main mathematical theories were expected to be formalized, this lesson concerning language was only the first part of the story. The need for re-investigation of the concept of relational structure, and the concept of cardinality in particular, became acute only in view of results by Paul Cohen, Solomon Feferman and Azriel Lévy in the seventh decade of the century. It is shown how the relativity of cardinality should be understood and why instead of being attributed to sets as such it should be rather attributed to sets as basic sets of relational structures. It is also shown that, if properly understood, the relativity of cardinals may be relevant not only for the philosophy of mathematics but for metaphysics as well.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See also [8, p. 146] and [24, p. 142]
References
Arkeryd, Leif. 2005. “Nonstandard Analysis.” The American Mathematical Monthly 112:926–28.
Arsenijević, Miloš, and Miodrag Kapetanović. 2008. “The ‘Great Struggle’ Between Cantorians and Neo-Aristotelians: Much Ado About Nothing.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 76:79–90.
Arsenijević, Miloš, and Miodrag Kapetanović. 2008. “An \(\mathrm{L}_{\omega_{1}\omega_{1}}\) Axiomatization of the Linear Archimedean Continua as Merely Relational Structures.” WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics 7:39–47.
Brouwer, Luitzen Egbertus Jan. 1975. Collected Works I. Amsterdam: North-Holland and Elsevier.
Cantor, Georg. 1962. Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts. Edited by Ernst Zermelo. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
Cohen, Paul. 1963. “The Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 50:1143–48.
Cohen, Paul. 1964. “The Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis II.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 51:105–10.
Cohen, Paul. 1966. Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. New York, NY: W.A. Benjamin.
Feferman, Solomon, and Azriel Lévy. 1963. “Independence Results in Set Theory by Cohen’s Method II.” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 10:592–93.
Fraenkel, Abraham Adolf. 1922. “Zu den Grundlagen der Cantor-Zermeloschen Mengenlehre.” Mathematische Annalen 86:230–37.
Fraenkel, Abraham Adolf, and Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. 1958. Foundations of Set Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Fraenkel, Abraham Adolf, Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, and Azriel Levy. 1973. Foundation of Set Theory. 2nd revised edition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Frege, Gottlob. 1960. “Fuction and Concept.” In Translation from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, edited by Peter Geach and Max Black, 21–41. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, Gottlob. 1960. “On Concept and Object.” In Translation from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, edited by Peter Geach and Max Black, 42–55. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, Gottlob. 1960. “On Sense and Reference.” In Translation from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, edited by Peter Geach and Max Black, 56–78. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, Gottlob. 1964. Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Edited by M. Furth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gödel, Kurt. 1930. “Die Vollständigkeit der Axiome des logischen Funktionenkalküls.” Monatschriften für Mathematik und Physik 37:349–60.
Gödel, Kurt. 1930/1931. “Über Vollständigkeit und Widerspruchsfreiheit.” Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums 3:12–13.
Gödel, Kurt. 1931. “Über formal unentscheibare Sätze der Pricipia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I.” Monatschriften für Mathematik und Physik 38:173–98.
Hilbert, David. 1918. “Axiomatisches Denken.” Mathematische Annalen 78:405–19.
Hilbert, David. 1922. “Neubegründung der Mathematik: Erste Mitteilung.” Abhandlungen aus dem Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität 1:157–77.
Hilbert, David, and Wilhelm Friedrich Ackermann. 1928. Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik. Berlin: Springer.
Hilbert, David. 1964. “On the Infinite.” In Philosophy of Mathematics, edited by Paul Benacerraf and Hilary Putnam, 134–54. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jech, Thomas. 1973. The Axiom of Choice. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Lévy, Azriel. 1963. “Independence Results in Set Theory by Cohens method I.” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 10:592–93.
Löwenheim, Leopold. 1915. “Über Möglichkeiten in Relativkalkül.” Mathematische Annalen 76:447–70.
Malcev, Anatoly. 1936. “Untersuchungen aus dem Gebiet der mathematischen Logik.” Recueil Mathématique 43:323–36.
von Neumann, John. 1925. “Eine Axiomatisierung der Mengenlehre.” Jahrschrift für Mathematik 154:219–40.
Robinson, Abraham. 1966. Non-standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Russell, Bertrand. 1997. My Philosophical Development, revised edition 1995. London: Routledge.
Skolem, Thoralf. 1920. “Logisch-kombinatorische Untersuchungen über die Erfüllbarkeit oder Beweisbarkeit mathematischer Sätze nebst einem Theoreme über dichte Mengen.” Skrifter utgit av Videnskapsselkapet i Kristiania I, Matematiska-Naturvetenskap Kl 4:1–36.
Skolem, Thoralf. 1922. “Einige Bemerkungen zur axiomatischen Begründung der Mengenlehre.” Wissenschaftliche Vorträge gehalten auf dem 5. Kongress der skandinavischen Mathematiker in Helsingfors 4:217–32.
Skolem, Thoralf. 1923. “Begründung der elementaren Arithmetik durch die rekurrierende Denkweise ohne Anwendung scheinbarer Veränderlichen mit unendlichem Ausdehnungsbereich.” Skrifter utgit av Videnskapsselkapet i Kristiania I, Matematiska-Naturvetenskap Kl 6:1–38.
Skolem, Thoralf. 1928. “Über die mathematische Logik.” Norsk. Mat. Tidsk. 10:125–42.
Skolem, Thoralf. 1929. “Über einige Grundlagenfragen der Mathematik.” Skrifter uigit av det NorskeVid. Akad. i Oslo I 4:73–82.
Skolem, Thoralf. 1934. “Über die Nicht-Charakterisierbarkeit der Zahlenreihe mittels endlich oder abzählbar unendlich vieler Aussagen mit ausschliesslich Zahlenvariablen.” Foundations of Mathematics 23:150–61.
Todorčević, Stevo. 1997. “Comparing the Continuum with the First Two Uncountable Cardinals.” In Logic and Scientific Methods, 145–55. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Vaught, Robert Lawson. 1974. “Model Theory Before 1945.” In Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, edited by Leon Henkin et al., 153–72. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Weyl, Hermann. 1949. Philosophy of Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1955. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Zermelo, Ernst. 1930. “Über Grenzzahlen und Mengenbereiche.” Foundations of Mathematics 16:29–47.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgments I am very much thankful to Miloš Adžić for discussions about the topic and an anonymous referee for useful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arsenijević, M. (2012). The Philosophical Impact of the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem. In: Trobok, M., Miščević, N., Žarnić, B. (eds) Between Logic and Reality. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2390-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2390-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2389-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2390-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)