Skip to main content

The Semi-generative Lexicon: Limits on Productivity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 46))

Abstract

Although there is a clear requirement for generative devices in the lexicon, there are limits to productivity, which must be accounted for. This article provides an overview of several different classes of semi-productivity, including both lexical and phrasal examples. A probabilistic approach is outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Verspoor also notes that nouns like story and song occur with begin and finish in the sense of tell/perform. However, these might alternatively be classified as agentive. The data is also complicated because Verspoor excludes eventive nouns in her definition of metonymy, and while this distinction may be justified, it is a little hard to make precise. Her comparison with other verbs also raises interesting issues. For my current purposes, however, all that matters are the limitations on the use of begin and finish with nouns denoting physical objects or substances, since this is not predicted on a fully productive account of metonymy.

  2. 2.

    Although this concept has been discussed in the literature, there doesn’t appear to be any standard terminology: the term anti-collocation is taken from Pearce (2001).

  3. 3.

    The phrase heavy eater is not found in the BNC: heavy eaters occurs once, but in a context referring to plants.

  4. 4.

    Notice that the non-compositional adjective-noun multiword expressions tend not to occur in predicative form. Adjectives applying to the event in a deverbal noun are also not found predicatively, in general: the smoker is heavy and the teacher is French only have the reading where the adjective applies directly to the individual.

References

  • Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar (Linguistic inquiry monograph 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, E. J., & Copestake, A. (1999). Lexical rules in constraint-based grammars. Computational Linguistics, 25(4), 487–526.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. V., & Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55, 767–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, A., & Briscoe E. J. (1996). Controlling the application of lexical rules. In Proceedings of the SIGLEX workshop on breadth and depth of semantic lexicons (pp. 7–19), Santa Cruz, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, A., & Flickinger. D. (2000). An open-source grammar development environment and broad-coverage English grammar using HPSG. In Proceedings of the second conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC-2000), Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, A., & Lascarides, A. (1997). Integrating symbolic and statistical representations: The lexicon-pragmatics interface. In Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-EACL 97, pp 136–143), Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53(4), 810–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (Ed.). (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Godard, D., & Jayez. J. (1993). Towards a proper treatment of coercion phenomena. In Proceedings of the sixth conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-93, pp. 168–177), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J., Stickel, M., Appelt, D., & Martin, P. (1993). Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 63(1), 69–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mel’čuk, I., & Polguère, M. (1987). A formal lexicon in meaning-text theory (or how to do lexica with words). Computational Linguistics, 13(3–4), 261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, G. D. (1978). The pragmatics of reference. Doctoral dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostler, N., & Atkins, B. T. S. (1992). Predictable meaning shift: Some linguistic properties of lexical implication rules. Lexical semantics and knowledge representation. In J. Pustejovsky & S. Bergler (Eds.), Proceedings of the first SIGLEX workshop, Berkeley, CA (pp. 87–100). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (2001). Using conceptual similarity for collocation extraction. In Proceedings of the Fourth annual CLUK colloquium, Sheffield, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J., & Bouillon, P. (1995). Aspectual coercion and logical polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 12(2), 133–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sag, I. A., Baldwin. T., Bond. F., Copestake. A., & Flickinger, D. (2002). Multiword expressions: A pain in the neck for NLP. In Proceedings of the third international conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics (CICLING 2002, pp. 1–15), Mexico City, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspoor, C. M. (1997). Contextually-dependent lexical semantics. PhD thesis, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on an earlier work published in the proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon in 2001, but it also includes some material presented at the 3rd Workshop in 2005. I am grateful to the audiences at both events for their feedback and also to the other colleagues who commented on the earlier paper. I am especially grateful to Ted Briscoe and Simone Teufel for their detailed comments on this version. As usual, all mistakes are the responsibility of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Copestake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Copestake, A. (2013). The Semi-generative Lexicon: Limits on Productivity. In: Pustejovsky, J., Bouillon, P., Isahara, H., Kanzaki, K., Lee, C. (eds) Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 46. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5189-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5189-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5188-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5189-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics