Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance Comparison of OLSR and AODV Protocols in a VANET Crossroad Scenario

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology Convergence

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 253))

Abstract

In this work, we evaluate the performance of OLSR and AODV protocols in a VANET crossroad scenario. As evaluation metrics, we use Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Throughput and Delay. We analyse the performance of the network by sending Constant Bit Rate (CBR) traffic and considering different number of connections. The simulation results show that when the number of connections is high, OLSR performs better than AODV protocol in this VANET scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Harri J, Filali F, Bonnet C (2009) Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: a survey and taxonomy. IEEE Commun Surv Tuto 11(4):19–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bai F, Sadagopan N, Helmy A (2003) MPORTANT: a framework to systematically analyze the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for ad-hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM-2003, Mar–Apr 2003, pp 825–835

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sadagopan N, Bai F, Krishnamachari B, Helmy A (2003) PATHS: analysis of path duration statistics and their impact on reactive manet routing protocols. In: Proceedings of the 4-th ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (mobihoc 2003), pp 245–256

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fiore M, Harri J, Filali F, Bonnet C (2007) Vehicular mobility simulation for VANETs. In: Proceedings of the 40-th annual simulation symposium (ANSS-2007), pp 301–309

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith L, Beckan R, Anson R, Nagel K, Williams M (1995) TRANSIMS: transportation analysis and simulation system. In: Proceedings of the 5-th national transportation planning methods applications conference, LA-UR 95–1664 Apr 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. Piorkowski M, Raya M, Lugo AL, Grossglauser M, Hubaux JP (2006) Joint traffic and network simulator for VANETs. In: Proceedings of the mobile and information communication systems conference (MICS-2006) Oct 2006, Available online at: http://www.mics.ch/

  7. De Marco G, Tadauchi M, Barolli L (2007) Description and analysis of a toolbox for vehicular networks simulation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ICPADS/PMAC-2WN, vol 2, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nagel K, Schreckenberg M (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J Physics I Fr 2:2221–2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Spaho E, Mino Gj, Barolli L, Xhafa F (2011) Goodput and PDR analysis of AODV, OLSR and DYMO protocols for vehicular networks using CAVENET. Int J Grid Util Comput (IJGUC) 2(2): 130–138

    Google Scholar 

  10. Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S (2003) Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) routing. In: IETF RFC 3561 (Experimental)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clausen T, Jacquet P (2003) Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR). In: IETF RFC 3626, Oct 2003

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sommer C, Dressler F (2007) The DYMO routing protocol in VANET scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 66-th IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC2007-Fall), pp 16–20

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perkins CE, Bhagwat P (1994) Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance vector routing (dsdv) for mobile computers. ACM 234–244

    Google Scholar 

  14. Information science institute (ISI), Network simulator version 2 (NS-2) http://www.isi.edu/nsnam

  15. The ns-3 network simulator. http://www.nsnam.org

  16. Dhoutaut D, R’egis A, Spies F (2006) Impact of radio propagation models in vehicular ad hoc networks simulations. In: Proceedings of the VANET-2006, pp 40–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). The authors would like to thank JSPS for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT), 3-30-1 Wajiro-Higashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 811-0295, Japan

    Evjola Spaho

  2. Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT), 3-30-1 Wajiro-Higashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 811-0295, Japan

    Makoto Ikeda & Leonard Barolli

  3. Technical University of Catalonia, Department of Languages and Informatics Systems, C/Jordi Girona 1-3, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

    Fatos Xhafa

Authors
  1. Evjola Spaho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Makoto Ikeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leonard Barolli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fatos Xhafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evjola Spaho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul University of Science & and Technology (SeoulTech), Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

    James J. (Jong Hyuk) Park

  2. Dept. Information & Communication Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology Fac. Information Engineering, Fukuoka, Japan

    Leonard Barolli

  3. Departament De Llenguatges I Sistemes Informàtics, Universitat Politècnica De Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

    Fatos Xhafa

  4. Humanitas College, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

    Hwa-Young Jeong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Spaho, E., Ikeda, M., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F. (2013). Performance Comparison of OLSR and AODV Protocols in a VANET Crossroad Scenario. In: Park, J., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Jeong, HY. (eds) Information Technology Convergence. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 253. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6996-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6996-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6995-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6996-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation