Skip to main content

Comparing Knowledge Management Application in Chile and Other OECD Countries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2846 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

There is not many studies regarding the use of Knowledge Management (KM) practices in Chile, and not a study that compares this usage with other countries. This research is aimed to find out the level of use of selected KM practices in Chile, the importance that has in the companies and if it is a formal part of the company strategy (level of institutionalization).The Center for Educational Research and Innovation of the OECD performed during the years 1999–2003 a series of studies based on a survey developed by a joint working group from Canada, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden and representatives of research organizations in Australia, Denmark, Germany and Ireland. This study uses the methodology developed by these research centers to analyze motives and effects of using knowledge management practices in the Chilean industry, in the light of the recent addition of Chile as a full member of the OECD in 2010 and compare the levels of adoption with Germany and Canada. To achieve the stated objective a survey to 147 Chilean executives from various industries was conducted. The results indicate that the Chilean industry has an average of 8.6 practices in use of a total of 17 selected practices for this research, being the use of the Internet to capture external knowledge the most used and common practice. Both in this study as those in other countries, the results indicate a positive correlation between firm size and average utilization of practices. Along the same lines the KM correlates positively with innovation, where countries with greater use of KM, have in turn increased rates of innovation measure by the global innovation index. Both the use and efficiency reasons attributed to the KM by the Chileans are below the results obtained in studies by the OECD in Germany and Canada, denoting a low industrial use of KM practices in the country and correlated with a low innovation index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(1):150–169

    Google Scholar 

  2. Choo CW (1998) Information management for the intelligent organization: the art of scanning the environment. Information Today Inc., Medford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davenport T, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edler, Jakob. Enero 2003. Knowledge Management in German Industry. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edvinsson L, Malone M (1997) Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. Harper Business, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hubert Saint-Onge (1996) Tacit knowledge the key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital, Strategy & Leadership, 24(2):10–16

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liberona D 2011 Knowledge management research review. SSRN publication, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1986195

  8. Mckinsey (2010) How companies are benefiting from Web 2.0. Mckinsey global Survey

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miron M, Cecil J, Bradicich K, Hall G (1988) The myths and realities of competitive advantage. Datamation 34(19):71–82

    Google Scholar 

  10. OECD (2003) Measuring knowledge management in the business sector, first steps

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Liberona .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liberona, D., Fuenzalida, D. (2014). Comparing Knowledge Management Application in Chile and Other OECD Countries. In: Uden, L., Wang, L., Corchado Rodríguez, J., Yang, HC., Ting, IH. (eds) The 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7287-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7287-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7286-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7287-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics