Abstract
The practice of law is one that has been associated with the practice of knowledge and skills which invariably requires objective use of information. Law firms are now being challenged by the need to better manage their collective knowledge as an asset to their business. Traditional methods of managing human capital, innovation, and learning within law firms, have proven ineffective as they more often than not fail to contribute to a firm’s success. In an ideal setting, having a good knowledge management initiative in place may offer the opportunity for a practising lawyer to experience a better work or life balance. Some legal firms are on the threshold of embarking on comprehensive knowledge management strategies aiming to improve the way they manage their knowledge. However, such strategies are far more complex as one would imagine. Knowledge Management (KM) initiatives should not merely be seen as an attempt to alleviate some of the problems of poor control and poor use of knowledge and information resources in the face of increasing complexity but also as a means for organisations to have better leverage on what it does best. A holistic implementation of a KM initiative is deemed necessary so that such an initiative does not disrupt existing work processes, but adds value to a legal setup leading to improved productivity and better clientele services. Such an initiative should not only make a lawyer’s job easier but perhaps also result in greater work satisfaction for a lawyer over time. This case study based research dwells into embedding law firms with a holistic implementation of KM. It proposes a KM initiative for legal establishments albeit to one firm. The aforementioned legal establishment would need to remain anonymous due to the nature of the research and will hereafter be referred to as AP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
The 7 Faces of Legal Knowledge Management. Law Tech, Canada. http://www.slaw.ca/2009/10/21/the-7-faces-of-legal-knowledge-management/, Accessed 20 Aug 2013
Ingie H (2012) Knowledge management and organisational learning: an international development perspective—an annotated bibliography, Working Paper 224, Overseas Development Institute, London. Accessed http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/170.pdf
Whalley M, Rodwell I (2010) Valuing value-add—analysis of joint survey results, berwin leighton paisner. Accessed www.blplaw.com
Mitra A, Lau J (2004) Challenges of developing an interactive knowledge warehouse within the media industry: significance of emergent frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 13th European conference on information systems, The European IS Profession in the Global Networking Environment, ECIS, Finland. Accessed http://www.pubzone.org/dblp/conf/ecis/MitraL04
Tjaden T (2013) Legal and research writing. essentials of Canadian law, 3rd edn. ISBN-13: 9781552211762
Kabene S, Philip King M, Nada S (2006) Knowledge management in law firms. J Inf Law Technol (JILT) 1:1–21
Wickramasinghe N, Rajeev KB, Brian L, Jonathan S, Chris MG (2009) Healthcare knowledge management primer. Routledge Series in Information Systems, 14
Autonomy Inc, iManage Worksite (2011). Accessed http://www.officeinfo.com.au/Assets/Documents/Autonomy-iManage-WorkSite.pdf
Martin G (2012) Smart content framework, white paper, Concept Searching, USA
Ronald WS (2011) Perspectives on knowledge management in law firms, white paper, Lexis-Nexis, Springboro Pike, Miamisburg, United States. Accessed http://www.lexisnexis.com/presscenter/hottopics/kminfirms.pdf
Alan DS, William TR (2003) Knowledge workers: exploring the link among performance rating, pay and motivational aspects. J. Knowl Manag 7:120–130
Sukumaran S, Rahim A, Chandran K (2012) Knowledge elicitation using activity theory for supervision of projects. In: Proceedings of 7th KMO conference (KMO 2012), Salamanca, Spain. Springer
Uden L (2001) Activity theory for requirements engineering. argentina symposium on software engineering (ASSE). Buenos Aires, 10–11th Sept, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Engeström Y (1999) Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In: Engeström Y, Miettinen R, Punamaki R (eds) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Martin A, Petter G (2003) Essential knowledge and management issues in law firms. Universal Publishers, USA. ISBN 978-1-61233-009-9, 83, 2012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sukumaran, S., Chandran, K., Chandran, K. (2014). Knowledge Management Strategy Using Activity Theory for a Law Firm. In: Uden, L., Wang, L., Corchado Rodríguez, J., Yang, HC., Ting, IH. (eds) The 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7287-8_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7287-8_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7286-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7287-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)