Skip to main content

Erasure in Design Space Exploration

  • Chapter

Abstract

Design space explorers support designers through the metaphor of exploration, a guided movement through a space of possibilities. A subsumption-based design space explorer structures the space in which it navigates by a relation of information specificity. In particular, it conditions its exploration operators so that they move in predictable ways in the underlying space of designs. We have extended the formal system of typed features structures to support subsumption-based design space exploration. This paper discusses the exploration operators available when subsumption-based design space explorers are implemented in typed feature structures. Of particular interest is the handling of erasure, where the constraint on generative operators to be monotonic wrt information specificity leads to a surprisingly clean view of erasure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agarwal, M. and Cagan, J.: 1988, A blend of different tastes: The language of coffee makers, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(2), 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aït-Kaci, H., Boyer, R., Lincoln, P., and Nasr, R.: 1989, Efficient implementation of latice operations, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 11(1), 115–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aït-Kaci, H. and Podelski, A.: 1993, Towards a meaning of LIFE, Technical Report 11, Paris Research Laboratory of Digital Equipment Centre Technique Europe, Rueil-Malmaison, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aït-Kaci, H., Podelski, A., and Goldstein, S. C.: 1993, Order-sorted feature theory unification, Technical Report 32, Paris Research Laboratory of Digital Equipment Centre Technique Europe, Rueil-Malmaison, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R.: 1992, The Logic of Typed Feature Structures: With Applications to Unification Grammars, Logic Programs and Constraint Resolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, C.: 1993, An Algebraic Approach to the Description of Design Spaces, PhD thesis, Department of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, C. and Woodbury, R.: 1994, Hands-on exploration of recursive patterns, Languages of Design, 2, 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, S.: 1989, Shapes and shape grammars: from mathematical model to computer implementation, Planning and Design, 16(2), 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, S.-F., Donia, M., Snyder, J., and Tsai, W.-J.: 1998, Sg-clips: A system to support the automatic generation of design from grammars, CAADRIA’98, Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, Osaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, R.: 1991, ABLOOS: An Evolving Hierarchical Design Framework, PhD thesis, Department of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, J. and Simondetti, A.: 1997, Basic grammars and rapid prototyping, Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Structural Engineering, Tampere, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G.: 1995, Managing Complex Objects, PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, U. and Woodbury, R. F.: 1995, Software Environment to support Early phases in building Design SEED: Overview, ASCE Journal of Architectural Engineering, 1(4), 147–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gips, J.: 1975, Shape Grammar and Their Uses, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorti, S. R., Kim, G. J., and Siriam, R. D.: 1998, An object-oriented representation for product and design processes, Computer-Aided Design, 30(7), 489–501.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harada, M.: 1997, Discrete/Continuous Design Exploration by Direct Manipulation, PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada, M., Witkin, A., and Baraff., D.: 1995, Interactive physically-based manipulation of discrete/continuous models, SIGGRAPH’ 95 Conference Proceedings, ACM Siggraph, ACM, 29, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisserman, J.: 1994, Generative geometric design, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 14(2), 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, R.: 1980, The arithmetic of shapes, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 7, 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, R.: 1981, The construction of shapes, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 8, 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, R. and Giraud, C.: 1986, Towards a shape editor: the implementation of a shape generation system, Planning and Design, 13(4), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., Woodbury, R., and Radford, A.: 1998, A comparison of shape grammars, parametric shape grammars and shape schema grammars, in Barrallo, J., (ed), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Mathematics and Design, The University of the Basque Country, San Sebastian, pp. 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazzalunga, U. and Fitzhorn, P. I.: 1988, Note on a three-dimensional shape grammar interpreter, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(2), 211–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G.: 1980, Introduction to shape and shape grammars, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 7(3), 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G. and March, L.: 1981, Design machines, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 8(3), 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, M. A.: 1999, GEdit: A computer implementation of a shape grammar system performing computations with 2-d lines and labeled points, retrieved from the World Wide Web on October 8, 1999 at http://www.shapegrammar.org/projects.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. and Duarte, J. P.: 1998, Synthesising 3d forms: Basic grammars and rapid prototyping

    Google Scholar 

  • Wille, R.: 1992, Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems, Computers Math. Applic., 23(6-9), 493–515.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury, R. F. and Chang, T.-W.: 1995, Massing and enclosure design with SEED-Config, ASCE Journal of Architectural Engineering, 1(4), 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury, R. F., Radford, A. D., Taplin, P. N., and Coppins, S. A.: 1992, Tartan worlds: A generative symbol grammar system, in Noble, D. and Kensek, K., (eds.), ACADIA 92, Charleston, SC, pp. 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woodbury, R., Datta, S., Burrow, A. (2000). Erasure in Design Space Exploration. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’00. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4154-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4154-3_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5811-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4154-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics